Agent drives ui
Reusable public SKILL.md workflows for AI agents
npx -y skills add selamy-labs/agent-skills --skill agent-drives-uiAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when an agent operates a UI on the user's behalf through conversation, navigating, filling forms, updating live views, with real-time bi-directional state sync. Activates on conversational app control, agent drives the front end, agentic UX, or choosing an agent-to-app protocol.
SKILL.md
3.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Agent Drives the UI (AG-UI pattern)
A UX where the agent operates the application for the user through conversation: the user says "go to Atlas and show this address" and the agent drives the map + street view; "set the campaign time" and events appear in the live calendar instantly. The agent isn't just chatting beside the app — it drives the app, and the UI stays in real-time sync both ways.
Adopt an open protocol — don't invent one
Drive the app over an open, standardized agent-to-UI protocol rather than a bespoke websocket scheme. The properties that matter for this layer:
- Open, lightweight, bi-directional connection between a user-facing app and any agent backend.
- A single event stream over standard HTTP / SSE (with an optional binary channel).
- Event types covering messages, tool calls, state patches, and lifecycle signals.
- Shared state: bi-directional sync of agent ↔ application state (read/write or read-only).
- Frontend tool calls (agent invokes UI actions), human-in-the-loop approvals, and session management.
- Backend-agnostic, with first-class client SDKs.
The reference implementation of this layer is the AG-UI (Agent–User Interaction Protocol). Prefer an established protocol with these properties over rolling your own; evaluate a declarative/generative-UI protocol separately if the app needs the agent to render UI rather than drive existing UI.
How the protocol layers compose
Each layer connects a different pair of parties — keep them distinct:
- Agent ↔ tools/data (e.g. MCP).
- Agent ↔ other agents (e.g. A2A).
- Agent runtime ↔ the user-facing app — this skill's layer.
Design rules
- Frontend actions are tools. Model "navigate", "set field", "open view", "create event" as explicit frontend tool calls the agent invokes — not free-text the UI guesses at.
- Single source of truth via shared state, synced both directions: the agent reads what the user sees and writes changes that render instantly (the live-calendar/live-map effect).
- Stream, don't block. Use the event stream (SSE) so the UI reacts in real time as the agent works — partial messages, intermediate state patches, lifecycle signals.
- Human-in-the-loop on consequential actions. Use the protocol's approval events for anything irreversible/outward-facing; the agent proposes, the user confirms.
- Degrade safely. Pair with sim-zero so the UI-driving harness can be exercised without live model calls (see
sim-zero-mode).
When to use / not
- Use when an agent should operate an app for the user (conversational campaign/CRM/ops management, a "virtual employee" driving tools, conversational dashboards).
- Don't reach for it for a plain chat sidebar that never touches app state — that's just a chat box; AG-UI's value is the driving + shared state.
Anti-patterns
- A custom event protocol reinventing AG-UI → maintenance burden, no ecosystem.
- Agent mutates UI state out-of-band instead of through synced shared state → the two views drift.
- No approval gate on destructive actions → an agent confidently doing the wrong irreversible thing.