Review and handoff
Skill sefaertunc/Worclaude/.claude/skills/review-and-handoff
CLI scaffolding tool that generates tailored .claude/ workflow infrastructure for Claude Code projects
npx -y skills add sefaertunc/Worclaude --skill review-and-handoffAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Session ending protocol, HANDOFF document format, seamless continuation between sessions
SKILL.md
3.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Review and Handoff
Session Ending Protocol
Every session should end cleanly. The /end command triggers this, but understanding the protocol matters more than the command.
Before ending:
- Commit any working code (don't leave uncommitted changes)
- Run tests to confirm nothing is broken
- Update PROGRESS.md
- If mid-task, write a HANDOFF document
PROGRESS.md Update
PROGRESS.md is the single source of truth for project state across sessions.
Update these sections:
## Current Status
{What phase/feature is active}
## Completed This Session
- {Specific thing done}
- {Another specific thing done}
## In Progress
- {What's partially done, and where it stands}
## Blockers
- {Anything preventing forward progress}
## Next Steps
- {Ordered list of what to do next}
Be specific. "Worked on auth" is useless. "Implemented JWT token generation and validation in src/auth/tokens.js; unit tests passing; integration tests not yet written" is useful.
HANDOFF Document Format
When ending mid-task, PROGRESS.md isn't enough. Write a handoff at
docs/handoffs/HANDOFF_{date}.md.
# Handoff: {Date}
## What I Was Doing
{1-2 sentences on the exact task}
## Current State
- Branch: {branch name}
- Last commit: {hash and message}
- Tests: {passing/failing, which ones}
- Files changed: {list of modified files}
## What's Left
1. {Next specific step}
2. {Step after that}
3. {Final step for this task}
## Context That Matters
- {Decision made during this session and why}
- {Gotcha discovered that isn't documented elsewhere}
- {Assumption being made that should be validated}
## How to Verify When Done
{What "done" looks like for this task}
What Context Matters
Include in handoffs:
- WHY decisions were made, not just what
- Failed approaches and why they failed (prevents re-trying dead ends)
- Dependencies discovered during implementation
- Anything that surprised you about the codebase
Don't include:
- Obvious things a fresh session can figure out from the code
- Full code dumps (the code is in version control)
- Speculation about future tasks unrelated to the current work
The Fresh Session Test
A good handoff passes this test: could a fresh Claude session, reading only PROGRESS.md and the HANDOFF file, continue the work without asking clarifying questions?
If no, the handoff is missing context.
Gotchas
- Don't skip the handoff because "it's almost done." You might not get back to this task for days. What's obvious now will be opaque later.
- HANDOFF files are ephemeral. Delete them once the task is complete. Don't let stale handoffs accumulate — they become misleading.
- Always commit before writing the handoff. The handoff references a commit hash. If the code isn't committed, the handoff points to nothing.
- Update PROGRESS.md even if you write a HANDOFF. PROGRESS.md is the persistent state; HANDOFF is the detailed supplement.