Defense in depth validation
Skill secondsky/claude-skills/plugins/defense-in-depth-validation/skills/defense-in-depth-validation
Production-ready skills for Claude Code CLI - Cloudflare, React, Tailwind v4, and AI integrations
npx -y skills add secondsky/claude-skills --skill defense-in-depth-validationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Validate at every layer data passes through to make bugs impossible. Use when invalid data causes failures deep in execution, requiring validation at multiple system layers.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
5.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Defense-in-Depth Validation
Overview
When you fix a bug caused by invalid data, adding validation at one place feels sufficient. But that single check can be bypassed by different code paths, refactoring, or mocks.
Core principle: Validate at EVERY layer data passes through. Make the bug structurally impossible.
Why Multiple Layers
Single validation: "We fixed the bug" Multiple layers: "We made the bug impossible"
Different layers catch different cases:
- Entry validation catches most bugs
- Business logic catches edge cases
- Environment guards prevent context-specific dangers
- Debug logging helps when other layers fail
The Four Layers
Layer 1: Entry Point Validation
Purpose: Reject obviously invalid input at API boundary
function createProject(name: string, workingDirectory: string) {
if (!workingDirectory || workingDirectory.trim() === '') {
throw new Error('workingDirectory cannot be empty');
}
if (!existsSync(workingDirectory)) {
throw new Error(`workingDirectory does not exist: ${workingDirectory}`);
}
if (!statSync(workingDirectory).isDirectory()) {
throw new Error(`workingDirectory is not a directory: ${workingDirectory}`);
}
// ... proceed
}
Layer 2: Business Logic Validation
Purpose: Ensure data makes sense for this operation
function initializeWorkspace(projectDir: string, sessionId: string) {
if (!projectDir) {
throw new Error('projectDir required for workspace initialization');
}
// ... proceed
}
Layer 3: Environment Guards
Purpose: Prevent dangerous operations in specific contexts
async function gitInit(directory: string) {
// In tests, refuse git init outside temp directories
if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test') {
const normalized = normalize(resolve(directory));
const tmpDir = normalize(resolve(tmpdir()));
if (!normalized.startsWith(tmpDir)) {
throw new Error(
`Refusing git init outside temp dir during tests: ${directory}`
);
}
}
// ... proceed
}
Layer 4: Debug Instrumentation
Purpose: Capture context for forensics
async function gitInit(directory: string) {
const stack = new Error().stack;
logger.debug('About to git init', {
directory,
cwd: process.cwd(),
stack,
});
// ... proceed
}
Applying the Pattern
When you find a bug:
- Trace the data flow - Where does bad value originate? Where used?
- Map all checkpoints - List every point data passes through
- Add validation at each layer - Entry, business, environment, debug
- Test each layer - Try to bypass layer 1, verify layer 2 catches it
Example from Session
Bug: Empty projectDir caused git init in source code
Data flow:
- Test setup → empty string
Project.create(name, '')WorkspaceManager.createWorkspace('')git initruns inprocess.cwd()
Four layers added:
- Layer 1:
Project.create()validates not empty/exists/writable - Layer 2:
WorkspaceManagervalidates projectDir not empty - Layer 3:
WorktreeManagerrefuses git init outside tmpdir in tests - Layer 4: Stack trace logging before git init
Result: All 1847 tests passed, bug impossible to reproduce
Key Insight
All four layers were necessary. During testing, each layer caught bugs the others missed:
- Different code paths bypassed entry validation
- Mocks bypassed business logic checks
- Edge cases on different platforms needed environment guards
- Debug logging identified structural misuse
Don't stop at one validation point. Add checks at every layer.
Security defense-in-depth
The same layered approach is the standard pattern for security controls: trust is never granted at a single point, so that a bug or bypass in any one layer cannot by itself compromise the system. Each request is checked independently at the edge, in the handler, and at the data layer.
- Layer 1 (edge): rate-limit and filter at the edge (CDN/WAF such as Cloudflare or AWS WAF) so abusive traffic never reaches the origin.
- Layer 2 (handler): re-derive authorization server-side from the session
— never trust a client-supplied claim like a
userIdin the body. - Layer 3 (data): enforce the ownership invariant in the database query so that even a handler bug cannot cross tenant boundaries.
// Layer 2 — re-derive authz server-side, never trust client claims
app.put('/docs/:id', async (req, res) => {
const user = await verifySession(req.cookies.session); // throws if invalid
// Layer 3 — DB clause re-checks ownership; a handler bug still can't cross tenants
const updated = await db.query(
'UPDATE docs SET title = $1 WHERE id = $2 AND owner_id = $3 RETURNING *',
[req.body.title, req.params.id, user.id]
);
if (!updated.rowCount) return res.status(403).send('Not allowed');
res.json(updated.rows[0]);
});
Defense in depth means no single layer's failure is sufficient to compromise the system.