Post dev test
Post-development test completion. Use when: checking test coverage after feature-dev, writing missing integration/e2e tests. Not for: unit test generation (use codex-test-gen), test review (use test-review). Output: test files + coverage report.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add sd0xdev/sd0x-harness --skill post-dev-testAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
SKILL.md
9.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Post-Dev Test Skill
Trigger
- Keywords: add tests, integration test, e2e test, test coverage, post dev test
When to Use
- After completing feature development, before /precommit
- Want to ensure new features have sufficient integration/e2e coverage
- Unit tests exist, but higher-level tests are missing
Key Rule: Must Execute on Changes
Even if test coverage looks complete, tests must be executed whenever there are code changes.
| Scenario | Action |
|---|---|
| Code changes exist | Must execute related integration/e2e |
| Tests exist and are complete | Still execute to confirm no regression |
| Tests missing or insufficient | Write then execute |
| Pure doc/comment changes | Can skip |
Reason: Test coverage does not equal tests passing. Existing tests may fail due to code changes.
When NOT to Use
- Only need unit tests (use
/codex-test-gen) - Review existing tests (use
/codex-test-review) - Still in development (complete
/feature-devflow first)
Workflow
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 1: Analyze Context │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. From conversation history: what feature was developed? │
│ 2. Identify involved Service / Provider / Controller │
│ 3. List core flows and API endpoints │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 2: Check Existing Test Coverage │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Search test/integration/ for related tests │
│ 2. Search test/e2e/ for related tests │
│ 3. Assess coverage gaps │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 3: Determine Test Strategy │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ┌──────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Change Type │ Test Requirement │ │
│ ├──────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │
│ │ New API │ Integration test (Controller + Service) │ │
│ │ New Service │ Integration test (Service layer) │ │
│ │ Cross-svc │ E2E test (complete flow) │ │
│ │ DB operation │ Integration test (actual DB) │ │
│ │ External API │ Integration test (mock external) │ │
│ └──────────────┴────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 4: Write Tests │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Reference existing test patterns │
│ 2. Use {FRAMEWORK_MOCK_LIB} createApp / createRequester │
│ 3. Follow TEST_ENV environment variable conventions │
│ 4. Write to corresponding directory │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 5: Execute Verification │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Execute newly added tests │
│ 2. Confirm passing │
│ 3. Report results │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Test File Conventions
| Type | Directory | Naming | Env Variable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integration | test/integration/ | *.integration.test.ts or *.test.ts | TEST_ENV=integration |
| E2E | test/e2e/ | *.e2e.test.ts or *.test.ts | TEST_ENV=e2e |
Test Template
import { Application, Framework } from '{FRAMEWORK_WEB}';
import { close, createApp } from '{FRAMEWORK_MOCK_LIB}';
import { ITestRequester, createRequester } from '../../createRequester';
import { TestEnvironment, onlyIf } from '../../helper/test-env';
const describeIntegration = onlyIf([
TestEnvironment.INTEGRATION,
TestEnvironment.E2E,
]);
describeIntegration('Feature Integration Tests', () => {
let app: Application;
let request: ITestRequester;
beforeAll(async () => {
app = await createApp<Framework>();
request = await createRequester(app);
});
afterAll(async () => {
await close(app);
});
describe('Scenario: ...', () => {
it('should ...', async () => {
// Arrange
// Act
// Assert
});
});
});
Output
- Test files (integration/e2e) in correct directories
- Coverage delta report
- Gate: ✅ Coverage sufficient / ⛔ Gaps remaining
Verification
- Test files in correct directory
- Using correct TEST_ENV condition
- Tests can run independently
- Covers main flow + error scenarios
Execute Tests
# Execute single integration test
TEST_ENV=integration yarn jest test/integration/path/to/test.ts
# Execute single e2e test
TEST_ENV=e2e yarn jest test/e2e/path/to/test.ts
Examples
Input: (User Authentication feature developed in conversation)
Phase 1: Identify ActiveAssetsWeeklyService, ActiveAssetsCacheService involved
Phase 2: Search test/e2e/auth/ -> found missing login test
Phase 3: Decide to write E2E test (cross-service flow)
Phase 4: Write active-assets-weekly.e2e.test.ts
Phase 5: Execute test and verify passing
Input: (New API endpoint developed in conversation)
Phase 1: Identify Controller + Service
Phase 2: Search test/integration/controller/ -> no corresponding test
Phase 3: Decide to write Integration test
Phase 4: Write new-feature.integration.test.ts
Phase 5: Execute test and verify passing
References
references/test-patterns.md- Existing test pattern reference