Platform support escalation
Skill scumunna/programmatic-skills/skills/platform-support-escalation
Agent skills for programmatic trading, analytics, and account operations. DV360 first, multi-DSP and multi-runtime (Claude Code and Codex).
npx -y skills add scumunna/programmatic-skills --skill platform-support-escalationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Build strong platform support cases for DSP and ad platform issues, with reproduction steps, entity IDs, screenshots, report exports, business impact, desired outcome, escalation path, follow-up cadence, and privacy-safe evidence. Use when a case needs Google, Amazon, StackAdapt, TTD, Meta, TikTok, Microsoft, publisher, or verification vendor support.
SKILL.md
5.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Platform support escalation
Weak support cases waste days: "campaign not spending", "creative rejected", "report wrong". Strong cases prove scope, reproduce the issue, quantify impact, and ask for a specific outcome. This skill helps programmatic operators send support cases that platform teams can act on.
Use this when the issue cannot be resolved from the platform playbook, a partner has to check their side, or the team needs a clean record of what was asked and when.
When to use this skill
- A deal, line item, creative, report, tag, API, billing, or access issue needs platform support.
- The team needs to escalate from a basic support queue to a rep, partner manager, seller, or technical support path.
- A support case has stalled and needs a sharper evidence package.
- A client asks for the status of an issue that depends on a platform or vendor response.
Support case package
Every case should include:
| Field | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Platform and account | Include account, advertiser, partner, seat, or manager IDs where available |
| Entity scope | Campaign, order, line item, ad group, creative, deal, pixel, report, or API request IDs |
| Symptom | What is wrong, when it started, and whether it is ongoing |
| Reproduction steps | Exact clicks, report settings, API request, or export path |
| Evidence | Screenshots, exports, logs, result files, HAR files when safe, and timestamps |
| Business impact | Dollars at risk, launch delay, delivery shortfall, conversion loss, or client deadline |
| What changed recently | Bulk upload, creative swap, tag change, budget edit, audience edit, platform release |
| Ask | The specific action requested from support |
| Deadline | When the answer is needed and why |
| Privacy check | No secrets, credentials, raw user PII, or client-confidential data beyond what is needed |
Core process
- Confirm it is support-worthy. Run the platform troubleshooting skill first. If the desk can fix the issue internally, fix it internally. Escalate when the cause sits with the platform, a seller, a vendor, an API service, an approval queue, or gated account data.
- Name the binding symptom. Do not send a case with five possible theories. State the observed failure: "Deal ID 987 delivered normally until July 2 at 14:00 PT, then dropped to zero while the parent campaign and backup open-exchange line continued spending."
- Prove scope. Show whether the issue affects one entity, one campaign, one advertiser, one region, one format, or the whole account. Scope is what tells support where to look.
- Attach reproducible evidence. Include report settings, filters, dates, time zone, screenshots, exports, and request IDs. If the issue is API-related, include endpoint, request ID, response code, and the smallest safe payload that reproduces it.
- Quantify business impact. Convert the issue into a risk: dollars not spent, dollars overspent, impressions short, conversions missing, launch delay, SLA breach, or brand risk.
- Ask for a specific outcome. Examples: confirm whether the deal is paused seller-side, clear a creative review queue, explain a reporting discrepancy, map a conversion, raise a quota, or confirm a platform incident.
- Set follow-up cadence. Track case ID, owner, last response, next follow-up time, and escalation owner in the ops control center.
Escalation ladder
| State | Action |
|---|---|
| New case | Submit evidence package through the normal support path |
| No acknowledgment inside SLA | Follow up with case ID and business impact |
| No useful response | Escalate to rep, partner manager, platform account team, or vendor contact |
| Active launch, spend, or brand risk | Page the desk lead and client owner after containment |
| Repeated failure | Add to incident postmortem or platform issue log |
Use approval-and-escalation-governance for who owns the escalation decision and
change-management-and-incident-response if the issue is an active incident.
Message template
Subject: [Platform] [Advertiser] [Issue] - action needed by [date/time/time zone]
Issue:
Observed impact:
Account and entity IDs:
Started:
Current state:
Reproduction steps:
Evidence attached:
Recent changes:
Business impact:
Requested action:
Deadline:
Internal owner:
Privacy and security guardrails
- Do not share credentials, refresh tokens, API secrets, or raw authentication headers.
- Redact user-level identifiers unless the platform explicitly requires a hashed or test value.
- Share the smallest export that proves the issue.
- Keep support evidence in the approved client or agency storage location, not in personal downloads.
- If a support case references regulated data or a legal risk, route to privacy or legal before sending.
Common pitfalls
- Asking support to "look into it" without a specific outcome.
- Sending screenshots without IDs, dates, filters, or time zone.
- Hiding the business impact. A platform team cannot prioritize a case it cannot size.
- Escalating a theory instead of a symptom. Support can test a symptom; theories waste cycles.
- Letting a case stall outside the ops board. Every waiting case needs a follow-up clock.
Related artifacts
templates/ops/platform-escalation-template.mdprogrammatic-ops-control-centerchange-management-and-incident-responseapproval-and-escalation-governance