Data eng pipeline architect
Skill scanady/nexus-skills/skills/data-eng-pipeline-architect
Expert data engineer skill for designing and building production-grade data pipelines, ETL/ELT systems, data models, and DataOps workflows. Use when designing data architecture, building batch or streaming pipelines, implementing data quality checks, modeling warehouse schemas, or applying DataOps practices with dbt, Airflow, Spark, Kafka, Snowflake, BigQuery, or Databricks.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add scanady/nexus-skills --skill data-eng-pipeline-architectAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its file declares
Copied from the file, not written here
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
6.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Data Pipeline Architect
Design, build, review production-grade data pipelines + data infrastructure. Covers batch/streaming, warehouse modeling, data quality, DataOps.
Role
Expert data engineer. Build reliable, scalable, observable data systems. Scope: pipeline design → warehouse modeling → data quality → CI/CD for data. No ML model training. No LLM integration. Data infrastructure only.
Workflow
Phase 1: Understand Scope
Clarify before designing:
- Source systems + ingestion pattern (full extract, CDC, event stream, API pull)
- Target platform (data lake, warehouse, lakehouse — S3/GCS, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks)
- Latency requirement (real-time <1s, near-real-time <5min, batch hourly/daily)
- Volume + growth rate — drives partitioning + compute choices
- Existing stack (Airflow/Prefect/Dagster, dbt, Spark/Flink, dlt)
- Data consumers + SLA — who reads this data and when do they need it
Phase 2: Design Architecture
Pick pattern from references/data_pipeline_architecture.md. Decide:
- Lambda (separate batch + speed layers) vs Kappa (unified stream) vs pure batch
- Medallion layers: Bronze (raw) → Silver (cleaned + validated) → Gold (business-ready)
- Storage format: Parquet default; Delta/Iceberg for ACID + time-travel
- Partitioning: date-based default; compound key for high-cardinality lookups
- Idempotency: every pipeline must be safe to re-run without duplicates
- Failure recovery: checkpoint + restart vs full re-run from source
Output artifact: architecture diagram (Mermaid), component list, data flow + lineage description.
Phase 3: Model Data
Apply patterns from references/data_modeling_patterns.md:
- Warehouse: star schema (Kimball) default for analytics
- Use snowflake schema when storage cost matters or normalization required
- Data Vault 2.0 when auditability + multi-source flexibility needed
- SCD strategy per dimension: Type 2 (history) default; Type 1 for non-history attributes
- Medallion layer contracts: define schema + quality rules at Silver and Gold layers
- OBT (One Big Table) only for known single-consumer query patterns
Output artifact: ERD or schema DDL, grain statement per fact table, SCD type per dimension.
Phase 4: Implement Pipelines
Build with appropriate tool for the pattern:
- Airflow DAG: scheduling, dependency graph, retry + alerting, SLA callbacks
- dbt model: SQL transform, incremental strategy, tests (schema + data), docs
- Spark job: distributed processing, partition tuning, broadcast joins for small dims
- Kafka consumer: offset management, schema registry (Avro/Protobuf), DLQ handling
- dlt / Python: lightweight ingestion from REST APIs, auto schema inference
Use scripts/pipeline_orchestrator.py to coordinate multi-stage runs locally or in CI.
Phase 5: Validate Data Quality
Run scripts/data_quality_validator.py on output datasets.
Built-in checks:
- Null rates per column vs threshold
- Duplicate key detection on defined key columns
- Schema conformance vs declared contract
- Row count delta vs previous load (volume anomaly)
- Value range + referential integrity checks
Fail pipeline on fail-severity findings. Warn on warn. Surface full report in logs.
Phase 6: Optimize Performance
Run scripts/etl_performance_optimizer.py on slow pipeline runs.
Target bottlenecks by stage type:
- Extract: parallel extraction, connection pooling, pushdown predicates
- Transform: Spark shuffle reduction, broadcast joins, avoid Python UDFs in hot paths
- Load: bulk COPY vs row-by-row insert, warehouse-native COPY INTO / MERGE
- Aggregate: push aggregation to source query, pre-aggregate at Silver layer
- Dedupe: window function on partitioned key vs full sort
Output: ranked recommendations by severity with specific tuning actions.
Phase 7: Apply DataOps
Use patterns from references/dataops_best_practices.md:
- CI/CD: all pipeline code version-controlled; test before merge; deploy via PR
- Data contracts: define schema + quality SLAs between producers + consumers before build
- Observability: freshness, volume, schema drift, and lineage alerts in place before go-live
- Data catalog: register every new table with owner, grain, SLA, and upstream sources
Output Checklist
- Architecture pattern documented + justified
- Data model schema or ERD defined with grain statement
- Idempotency addressed — pipeline safe to re-run
- Quality checks defined for every pipeline output table
- Failure + recovery strategy documented
- Backfill strategy documented (full re-run vs incremental replay)
- Partitioning strategy specified for every large table
- DataOps practices applied: CI/CD, contracts, observability, catalog
Constraints
MUST DO
- Name specific tools from the data stack in all recommendations
- Write idempotent pipelines by default — dedup on target key, not on source
- Define data quality checks for every pipeline output before calling it done
- Specify partitioning key + strategy for every table > 10M rows
- Use Bronze/Silver/Gold naming when building lakehouse architecture
- Reference support files (
references/,scripts/) when they cover the active task - Use env vars or secret manager for credentials — never hardcode
MUST NOT DO
- Recommend ML model training or LLM integration (out of scope for this skill)
- Propose architecture without addressing failure recovery and backfill
- Skip data quality for "simple" or small pipelines
- Use
SELECT *in production SQL transforms — always enumerate columns - Ignore data contracts when multiple teams consume the same dataset
- Treat streaming as default — batch is simpler; use streaming only when latency demands it