agentsclimarketplace

Ciso ai security

Skill sarfaraz-munir/Claude-Code-Cyber-agents/.claude/skills/ciso-ai-security

Hierarchical CISO AI agent swarm for Claude Code — 10 specialist agents covering risk governance, compliance, threat intelligence, vulnerability management, incident response, and AI security (OWASP LLM Top 10 / MITRE ATLAS). Includes MCP tools, Claude Code skills etc.

Install
npx -y skills add sarfaraz-munir/Claude-Code-Cyber-agents --skill ciso-ai-security

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Assess AI/LLM systems against OWASP LLM Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS. Evaluate AI governance against NIST AI RMF 1.0, EU AI Act 2024, and ISO/IEC 42001. Build AI red team plans and shadow AI inventory. Use whenever an AI system, LLM integration, or agentic workflow needs security review.

SKILL.md

2.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

CISO AI Security Assessment

Delegates to the ciso-ai-security specialist agent for focused AI/ML security analysis.

What This Skill Does

  • OWASP LLM Top 10 threat assessment per AI system
  • MITRE ATLAS adversarial technique mapping
  • AI governance gap analysis (NIST AI RMF / EU AI Act / ISO-42001)
  • AI red team plan generation
  • Shadow AI inventory with risk ratings

Required Inputs

For each AI system under assessment:

  • Name — what is the system called?
  • Type — llm | ml-model | agent-system | recommendation-engine
  • Deployment — saas-api | self-hosted | cloud-managed | on-premise
  • Data classes — PII? Financial? Health? Confidential IP?
  • Internet-facing? — yes/no
  • Uses external models? — OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.?
  • Agentic capabilities? — can it take actions, call tools, browse the web?
  • RAG? — retrieval-augmented generation?
  • Human oversight — full | partial | none
  • Regulatory scope — GDPR, EU-AI-Act-High-Risk, HIPAA, etc.?

Execution Pattern

Agent(ciso-ai-security, "Assess [system name]:
  type: [type]
  deployment: [deployment]
  dataClasses: [list]
  internetFacing: [bool]
  usesExternalModels: [bool]
  hasAgentCapabilities: [bool]
  hasRAG: [bool]
  humanOversight: [level]
  regulatoryScope: [list]
  
  Produce: threat findings, governance gaps, red team plan, shadow AI inventory"
)

Critical Findings to Flag

  • Prompt injection on internet-facing systems → always critical
  • Sensitive data disclosure with PII → critical
  • Excessive agency without human oversight → critical
  • No AI governance policy → high (EU AI Act compliance risk)
  • Shadow AI in browser extensions → critical

Output Structure

AI SECURITY ASSESSMENT: [System Name]

THREAT FINDINGS (OWASP LLM Top 10)
[ID] | [Threat] | [Severity] | [Evidence] | [Controls] | [Regulatory Impact]

AI GOVERNANCE GAPS
[Control] | [Status] | [Framework] | [Priority] | [Remediation]

RED TEAM PLAN
Objectives: [list]
Attack Categories:
  [Category] — [Techniques] — [Success Criteria]
Safety Constraints: [list]
Reporting Requirements: [list]

SHADOW AI INVENTORY
[Category] | [Risk] | [Data Exposure] | [Controls Required]

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.