Ciso ai security
Skill sarfaraz-munir/Claude-Code-Cyber-agents/.claude/skills/ciso-ai-security
Hierarchical CISO AI agent swarm for Claude Code — 10 specialist agents covering risk governance, compliance, threat intelligence, vulnerability management, incident response, and AI security (OWASP LLM Top 10 / MITRE ATLAS). Includes MCP tools, Claude Code skills etc.
npx -y skills add sarfaraz-munir/Claude-Code-Cyber-agents --skill ciso-ai-securityAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Assess AI/LLM systems against OWASP LLM Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS. Evaluate AI governance against NIST AI RMF 1.0, EU AI Act 2024, and ISO/IEC 42001. Build AI red team plans and shadow AI inventory. Use whenever an AI system, LLM integration, or agentic workflow needs security review.
SKILL.md
2.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
CISO AI Security Assessment
Delegates to the ciso-ai-security specialist agent for focused AI/ML security analysis.
What This Skill Does
- OWASP LLM Top 10 threat assessment per AI system
- MITRE ATLAS adversarial technique mapping
- AI governance gap analysis (NIST AI RMF / EU AI Act / ISO-42001)
- AI red team plan generation
- Shadow AI inventory with risk ratings
Required Inputs
For each AI system under assessment:
- Name — what is the system called?
- Type — llm | ml-model | agent-system | recommendation-engine
- Deployment — saas-api | self-hosted | cloud-managed | on-premise
- Data classes — PII? Financial? Health? Confidential IP?
- Internet-facing? — yes/no
- Uses external models? — OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.?
- Agentic capabilities? — can it take actions, call tools, browse the web?
- RAG? — retrieval-augmented generation?
- Human oversight — full | partial | none
- Regulatory scope — GDPR, EU-AI-Act-High-Risk, HIPAA, etc.?
Execution Pattern
Agent(ciso-ai-security, "Assess [system name]:
type: [type]
deployment: [deployment]
dataClasses: [list]
internetFacing: [bool]
usesExternalModels: [bool]
hasAgentCapabilities: [bool]
hasRAG: [bool]
humanOversight: [level]
regulatoryScope: [list]
Produce: threat findings, governance gaps, red team plan, shadow AI inventory"
)
Critical Findings to Flag
- Prompt injection on internet-facing systems → always critical
- Sensitive data disclosure with PII → critical
- Excessive agency without human oversight → critical
- No AI governance policy → high (EU AI Act compliance risk)
- Shadow AI in browser extensions → critical
Output Structure
AI SECURITY ASSESSMENT: [System Name]
THREAT FINDINGS (OWASP LLM Top 10)
[ID] | [Threat] | [Severity] | [Evidence] | [Controls] | [Regulatory Impact]
AI GOVERNANCE GAPS
[Control] | [Status] | [Framework] | [Priority] | [Remediation]
RED TEAM PLAN
Objectives: [list]
Attack Categories:
[Category] — [Techniques] — [Success Criteria]
Safety Constraints: [list]
Reporting Requirements: [list]
SHADOW AI INVENTORY
[Category] | [Risk] | [Data Exposure] | [Controls Required]