Skill knowledge management
Skill saitarrun/sdlc-ai-workflow/skills/skill-knowledge-management
Design docs, RFC (Request for Comments) process, ADR (Architecture Decision Records), code comments (WHY not WHAT), documentation structure, knowledge discovery and search, cross-team communication. Use when documenting decisions, writing design docs, or improving knowledge sharing.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add saitarrun/sdlc-ai-workflow --skill skill-knowledge-managementAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
2.2 KB, 474 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Skill: Knowledge Management
Design docs live in git. Decisions are documented. Knowledge is discoverable.
RFC (Request for Comments)
Before designing (gather feedback early):
## RFC: [Title]
### Problem
[What problem are we solving?]
### Proposed Solution
[How does this solve it?]
### Alternatives
[Other approaches and why we rejected them]
### Trade-offs
[What do we gain/lose?]
### Timeline
[When will this ship?]
Design Doc
Before implementing (detailed specification):
## Design Doc: [Title]
### Problem Statement
[Why are we building this?]
### Goals & Non-Goals
[What we're doing, what we're not]
### Proposed Design
[Architecture, data flow, components]
### Alternatives Considered
[Why we chose this approach]
### Trade-offs
[Maintainability vs. speed, etc.]
### Implementation Plan
[Phases, dependencies]
### Testing Strategy
[How will we verify this works?]
### Risks & Mitigation
[What could go wrong?]
ADR (Architecture Decision Record)
After deciding (commit to git as history):
## ADR-0001: Microservices vs. Monolith
### Context
[Why are we deciding?]
### Decision
[What are we choosing?]
### Consequences
[What changes?]
### Alternatives Considered
[Other options]
Code Comments
DO: Explain WHY
# ✓ Explain the decision
# Retry only on transient errors (connection refused, timeout)
# Don't retry on permanent errors (auth, not found)
if isinstance(error, TransientError):
retry()
DON'T: Explain WHAT (names say that)
# ✗ Redundant, names already say this
# Set retry count to 3
retry_count = 3
# ✓ Explain why 3
# Balances latency (most transient errors recover quickly)
# with reliability (rare cascading failures)
retry_count = 3
Status: Ready for knowledge work
Best for: Design docs, RFCs, ADRs, documentation
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.