Idempotency patterns
Skill sairam0424/MindForge/.mindforge/skills/idempotency-patterns
MindForge: The Enterprise Agentic Framework for Claude Code & Antigravity. High-performance autonomous execution, wave-parallelism, and multi-tier governance for production-grade AI engineering.
npx -y skills add sairam0424/MindForge --skill idempotency-patternsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
3.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Skill — Idempotency Patterns
When this skill activates
Any task involving idempotent API design, idempotency keys, exactly-once semantics, deduplication, replay safety, or retry-safe operations.
Mandatory actions when this skill is active
Before writing any code
- Identify which operations MUST be idempotent (any retryable operation).
- Determine key strategy (client-generated UUID in header).
- Choose storage backend (Redis for short-lived, DB for permanent records).
During implementation
- Accept keys via
Idempotency-Keyheader on all POST endpoints. - Store complete response with the key (status + body, not just success flag).
- Set appropriate TTL on idempotency records.
- Handle concurrent duplicates (lock or 409 Conflict).
After implementation
- Test concurrent duplicate requests (race condition safety).
- Verify partial failures are NOT cached (only complete operations).
- Document which endpoints are idempotent and key requirements.
Core Flow
1. Receive request with Idempotency-Key
2. Key exists in store? → YES: return cached response. NO: continue.
3. Lock key (prevent concurrent processing of same key)
4. Execute operation
5. Store: key → {status_code, body, created_at}
6. Release lock, return response
Idempotency Key Design
- Client-generated UUID v4 or ULID. Same key = same intended operation.
- Scope per-endpoint AND per-user:
idempotency:{user}:{endpoint}:{key}. - Max length: 255 chars. Stable across retries of same business action.
Storage Options
- Redis: fast, TTL built-in, atomic via Lua. Use for API requests (24h TTL).
- Database: durable, queryable. Use for financial/audit operations. Needs cleanup job.
Database Patterns
- INSERT ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING: safe insert, check RETURNING for duplicate.
- Conditional UPDATE:
WHERE version = $expected— 0 rows = stale (reject). - Transactional Outbox: atomically persist state + event, poll and publish.
Consumer Idempotency
- Dedup table:
processed_events(event_id PK, processed_at). - Flow: check if processed → BEGIN → process → INSERT dedup → COMMIT → ACK.
- TTL: retain dedup records for broker retention + buffer (e.g., 14 days).
API Design
- GET/PUT/DELETE: naturally idempotent (safe to retry without keys).
- POST/PATCH: require explicit
Idempotency-Keyheader. - Response headers:
Idempotent-Replayed: truefor cached responses.
Error Handling
- 4xx client errors: cache (client should not retry same bad input).
- 5xx server errors: do NOT cache (may succeed on retry).
- Partial completion: do NOT cache (delete record, retry from scratch).
Self-check before task completion
- Are idempotency keys accepted on all non-idempotent endpoints?
- Is the complete response cached (status + body)?
- Are concurrent duplicates handled safely (lock or 409)?
- Is TTL set appropriately on idempotency records?
- Are server errors excluded from caching?
- Are DB writes using conflict-safe patterns?
- Are message consumers deduplicating by event ID?