Api design
Skill s-hiraoku/synapse-a2a/plugins/synapse-a2a/skills/api-design
npx -y skills add s-hiraoku/synapse-a2a --skill api-designAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 9 stars9 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Guide API design for REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and CLI interfaces. Use this skill when designing new APIs, reviewing existing API contracts, or establishing API conventions for a project. Produces consistent, well-documented API specifications.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
3.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
API Design
Design consistent, well-documented APIs across REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and CLI interfaces.
When to Use
- Designing new API endpoints or commands
- Reviewing existing API contracts for consistency
- Establishing API naming and versioning conventions
- Planning backward-compatible API changes
- Generating API documentation or OpenAPI specs
Principles
- Consistency - Same patterns everywhere (naming, error format, pagination)
- Discoverability - A developer should guess the right endpoint/flag without reading docs
- Backward compatibility - Additions are safe; removals and renames require versioning
- Minimal surface - Expose only what consumers need; internal details stay internal
- Self-describing errors - Error responses should tell the caller what went wrong and how to fix it
REST API Checklist
Naming
- Use plural nouns for resources:
/users,/tasks - Use kebab-case for multi-word paths:
/user-settings - Nest for ownership:
/users/{id}/tasks - Use verbs only for actions that don't map to CRUD:
/tasks/{id}/approve
HTTP Methods
| Method | Purpose | Idempotent |
|---|---|---|
| GET | Read | Yes |
| POST | Create / action | No |
| PUT | Full replace | Yes |
| PATCH | Partial update | Yes |
| DELETE | Remove | Yes |
Response Format
{
"data": { ... },
"meta": { "page": 1, "total": 42 }
}
Error format:
{
"error": {
"code": "VALIDATION_ERROR",
"message": "Human-readable description",
"details": [
{ "field": "email", "reason": "required" }
]
}
}
Status Codes
| Code | Use |
|---|---|
| 200 | Success (with body) |
| 201 | Created |
| 204 | Success (no body) |
| 400 | Client error (validation) |
| 401 | Not authenticated |
| 403 | Not authorized |
| 404 | Not found |
| 409 | Conflict (duplicate, state mismatch) |
| 422 | Unprocessable (semantically invalid) |
| 500 | Server error |
Pagination
Use cursor-based for large datasets, offset-based for simple cases:
GET /tasks?cursor=abc123&limit=20
GET /tasks?page=2&per_page=20
Versioning
- Prefer URL prefix:
/v1/tasks,/v2/tasks - Use header-based only when URL versioning is impractical
CLI API Checklist
Command Structure
<tool> <noun> <verb> [args] [--flags]
Example: synapse send gemini "Review code" --wait
Flag Conventions
- Long form:
--output,--verbose - Short form for common flags:
-o,-v - Boolean flags:
--force,--no-color - Repeatable:
--attach file1 --attach file2 - Mutually exclusive groups:
--wait | --notify | --silent
Output
- Default: human-readable
--json: machine-readable JSON--quiet/-q: minimal output- Exit codes: 0 = success, 1 = error, 2 = usage error
Workflow
Step 1: Define Resources / Commands
List the entities and actions the API must support.
Step 2: Map to Endpoints / Subcommands
Apply naming conventions to produce the API surface.
Step 3: Define Request / Response Schemas
Specify required and optional fields, types, and validation rules.
Step 4: Document Error Cases
For each endpoint, list possible error responses and their meaning.
Step 5: Review for Consistency
Cross-check naming, error format, and pagination across all endpoints.