Agent stack
Skill runsagents/agent-stack
The map: how the runsagents artifacts compose into one control loop for agents with production stakes. A control loop, not a toolbox shelf.
npx -y skills add runsagents/agent-stackAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 26 days oldThe repository was created 26 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Route a production-stakes agent situation to the smallest fitting runsagents artifact or composition of artifacts.
SKILL.md
4.8 KB, ~1.0k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Agent stack router
Use this skill to choose controls, not to claim that a control has run. Select the smallest artifact set that addresses the current failure mode. Read the selected artifact's own repository before installing or applying it; those repositories are authoritative.
Route the situation
| Current situation | Route to | Why this fits | Boundary to preserve |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multiple writing agents need to work concurrently | agent-fleet-control | Creates separate worktrees, explicit path territory, task contracts, verification evidence, and local receipts. | It does not enforce paths at the OS level and never commits, pushes, or merges. |
| A meaningful diff needs an independent attack | rival-review | Gives the diff to a different model and preserves standing disagreement for the human. | Agreement is evidence, not proof; keep tests and gates. |
| You need to test whether a second reviewer adds recall | rival-review-bench | Measures local verdicts against 12 synthetic planted defects, including pair uplift. | It makes no model calls and does not estimate production defect rates. |
| An agent says work is merged, deployed, passing, published, or fixed | airlocks | Verifies the claim against the system of record from an independent context. | It checks state claims, not design quality. |
| A payment outcome needs cross-system evidence | settlement-proof | Compares processor, ledger, idempotency, and reconciliation state in a read-only packet. | It does not repair, retry, reverse, refund, or post. |
| Work is moving between agents or to a human | handoff-receipts | Requires a validated record of scope, decisions, risks, verification, artifacts, and acceptance checks. | Structural validity does not prove the claims are true. |
| Open questions need a risk-first order | loss-weighted-unknowns | Ranks stated unknowns by the loss shape of a bad outcome. | Scores are judgments; ranking neither discovers everything nor approves release. |
| The human needs to remain able to answer for shipped code | quiz-me | Examines the human on recent changes, grades eight answers, and reteaches misses. | It is an exam, not a code review. |
| Agent memory may outlive its source or scope | memory-ledger | Records and audits provenance, scope, confidence, expiry, supersession, and action eligibility. | Memory never expands current permission or replaces fresh approval. |
| A scheduled or unattended agent should inspect a repo | night-watch | Performs read-only checks, files validated findings, and stops. | File, don't fix; human triage remains required. |
| Model routing needs economic evidence | route-ledger | Prices observed inference, review, correction, rerun, and loss-proxy costs by task and model. | Require enough local evidence and a quality floor; synthetic demos make no benchmark claim. |
| An agent artifact is being considered for installation | permission-surface | Statically surfaces capability and risk signals without executing scanned content. | A quiet scan is not a safety certificate; inspect provenance and source. |
| Outbound writing should sound like the human | voice-calibration | Derives a corrected style guide and exemplars from corpus patterns, then blind-tests drafts. | Keep the corpus local where possible and treat the guide as personal data. |
Compose when the stakes cross boundaries
- Before parallel work:
permission-surfacefor incoming artifacts, thenagent-fleet-controlfor writers and territory. - Before merge:
rival-review; userival-review-benchseparately to validate the reviewer pairing. - Before accepting done:
airlocks, plussettlement-proofwhen the claim is a payment outcome. - Before transfer:
handoff-receipts, carrying the exact verification evidence and unresolved risks. - Before a consequential human decision:
loss-weighted-unknowns, thenquiz-meif the decision depends on understanding agent-written code. - After the decision:
memory-ledgerfor durable context,night-watchfor read-only unattended sweeps, androute-ledgerfor routing economics. - For words sent in the human's name:
voice-calibrationafter the substantive decision, never as a substitute for it.
Routing rules
- Name the failure mode and the system of record before choosing an artifact.
- Do not infer authorization from any artifact, receipt, memory entry, or prior approval.
- Keep doer, adversarial reviewer, and state verifier independent when the stakes justify the cost.
- Preserve uncertainty and disagreement verbatim for the human instead of letting agents negotiate it away.
- If no row fits, say so. Do not stretch an artifact beyond the limitations in its source repository.
What ships with it: 3 files
14.2 KB alongside SKILL.md
- CHANGELOG.md530 B
- LICENSE6.8 KB
- README.md6.9 KB