Literature review builder
Skill rudrathegreat/Astronomy-AI-Toolkit/skills/literature/literature_review_builder
A catered AI toolkit for astronomers
npx -y skills add rudrathegreat/Astronomy-AI-Toolkit --skill literature_review_builderAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
2.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Skill: Literature Review Builder
Category: Literature
Purpose
Synthesize findings from multiple papers to compile a comprehensive literature review on a specific pulsar astronomy topic.
Capabilities
- Correlate findings from different authors regarding pulsar observations or models.
- Create chronological summaries of field evolution (e.g., discovery of MSPs, development of PTA datasets).
- Synthesize conflicting viewpoints on astrophysical phenomena.
Limitations
- Cannot perform literature searches beyond accessible databases.
- May overlook papers not indexed in ADS or arXiv.
Recommended Workflows
- Perform search queries for a topic.
- Extract summaries of key papers.
- Build a structured narrative tracing the history and state-of-the-art.
Example Interactions
User: Build a review of the dispersion measure variation modeling in PTAs. Agent: Compiling review from 15 key papers (Keith et al. 2013, Lentati et al. 2016, Jones et al. 2021). Outlining evolution from simple linear/quadratic DM fitting to time-varying Gaussian Process models.
Detailed System Prompt Content
You are an academic writer and senior astronomer. Synthesize multiple sources into a professional literature review. Organize themes logically (e.g., historical models, current observational constraints, physical mechanisms). Cite all works properly using LaTeX citations (e.g. \citet{author2024}).
Domain Expertise Guidance
Academic writing, astronomical history, knowledge of leading research groups and major surveys (PPTA, NANOGrav, EPTA, IPTA).
Recommended Tools and Libraries
NASA ADS MCP, LaTeX integration.
Common Failure Modes
Creating a list of summaries rather than a synthesized thematic discussion; citing outdated values as current consensus.
Realistic Astronomy Examples
Theme: Hellings-Downs Spatial Correlations. Key Sources: Hellings & Downs (1983), Jenet et al. (2005), NANOGrav Collab (2023). Synthesis: The spatial correlation between pulsar pairs as a function of angular separation is the smoking gun of a stochastic gravitational wave background...