Ideate
My personal development harness for Claude Code and Codex. Use at your own risk.
npx -y skills add RubenGlez/harness --skill ideateAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Research a product idea on the web to assess market viability, identify competitors, and produce a go/no-go verdict. Use as the very first step when you have a new product idea, before product-plan.
SKILL.md
4.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Ideate
Step 1: Capture the idea
If the user has already described their idea in the conversation, use that. Otherwise ask one question:
"Describe the product you want to build in one sentence — what it does and who it's for."
Step 2: Research
Search the web systematically. Read the top results in full for each search — don't skim.
Competitor discovery
- Search
[keyword] app,[keyword] tool,[keyword] software - Search
[keyword] site:producthunt.com,[keyword] site:github.com - Search
best [keyword] alternative,open source [keyword] - For each competitor found: what it does, who it targets, pricing model, main limitation, approximate user base or GitHub stars
User pain signals
- Search
[keyword] reddit,[keyword] site:news.ycombinator.com - Look for "I wish [existing tool] could...", "why is there no tool that..."
- Note the recurring complaints users have with existing solutions — these are the real gaps
Market saturation
- How many serious competitors exist? Are they well-funded, indie, or abandoned?
- Is the open-source space active (recent commits, high stars) or stale?
- Are there multiple funded startups? One dominant player? A fragmented market?
Step 3: Synthesize
Assess across four dimensions:
Saturation — how crowded is the space? Is it dominated by one player, fragmented, or wide open?
Gap — what do users consistently complain about that no existing solution addresses? Be specific.
Differentiation potential — what angle could give this product a real edge — not a marginal improvement but a meaningfully different approach?
Viability — is the problem real, frequent, and worth solving? Would people pay for it, use it daily, or recommend it?
Produce a verdict:
- go — clear gap, realistic differentiation, winnable path
- conditional go — opportunity exists but depends on specific assumptions being true; name them
- no-go — saturated, no clear gap, or problem not strong enough to build on
Step 4: Write docs
Doctier bootstrap (once per repo)
.harness/ is tracked in git as age-encrypted blobs via doctier. If .doctier.yml exists at the repo root, skip this — the repo is already set up. If .harness/ already exists but is gitignored (a pre-doctier project), follow the adoption recipe in the migrate-docs skill's REFERENCE.md instead. Otherwise, run the bootstrap in ../_shared/doctier-bootstrap.md.
Write .harness/product/idea.md
Create the directory if it doesn't exist.
# Idea: [Name]
## Concept
One sentence: what it does and who it's for.
## Problem
The specific pain being solved. Who feels it, how often, how they deal with it today.
## Market landscape
### Existing solutions
| Solution | What it does | Main weakness | Stars / traction |
|----------|-------------|---------------|------------------|
| [name] | ... | ... | ... |
### Market saturation
[low / medium / high] — one paragraph on why.
### User pain signals
The recurring complaints found in forums, communities, and discussions.
### Opportunity
The specific gap that exists and why existing solutions don't fill it.
## Viability assessment
**Verdict**: go / conditional go / no-go
**Reasons**
1. ...
2. ...
3. ...
**Key assumptions to validate**
- [assumption] — how to test it cheaply
## Sources
- [URL] — what it contributed to the analysis
After writing, refresh the doc index and commit — worktrees and future sessions only see committed .harness/ content:
doctier agents --write
git add .harness AGENTS.md && git commit -m "docs: capture idea research"
Then share the verdict and key findings with the user. Recommend the next step:
- go / conditional go: "Run /product-plan to define the full product vision."
- no-go: explain what would need to change to reconsider.