Review response writer
Skill rshankras/claude-code-apple-skills/skills/app-store/review-response-writer
Write professional, empathetic responses to App Store reviews that build trust and turn critics into fans. Use when responding to negative reviews, drafting templates for common review types, or improving review management strategy.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add rshankras/claude-code-apple-skills --skill review-response-writerAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
SKILL.md
7.8 KB, ~1.8k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Review Response Writer
Write professional, empathetic responses to App Store reviews that build trust and turn critics into fans.
When This Skill Activates
- User needs to respond to negative reviews
- User wants templates for common review types
- User asks about review management strategy
- User wants to improve customer relationships
Response Philosophy
Why Respond?
- Shows you care - Active developer = trustworthy app
- Helps others - Future users read responses
- Converts critics - Can change rating with good response
- Provides feedback - Reviews reveal real issues
- Builds community - Creates loyal users
When to Respond
| Review Type | Respond? | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| 1-2 stars with feedback | Yes | High |
| 3 stars with suggestions | Yes | Medium |
| Bug reports (any rating) | Yes | High |
| 4-5 stars with content | Yes | Low |
| 4-5 stars generic praise | Optional | Low |
| Abusive/inappropriate | Report, don't respond | - |
| Competitor spam | Report, don't respond | - |
Response Timing
Negative reviews and bug reports: 24-48 hours. Positive reviews: weekly batch is fine. Follow up after fixing an issue to notify the reviewer.
Response Framework
The A.C.T. Formula
A - Acknowledge their experience
C - Clarify or provide solution
T - Thank them and invite continued feedback
Template Structure
[Greeting - use their name if signed]
[Acknowledge their frustration/praise]
[Address specific points they raised]
[Provide solution, workaround, or update info]
[Thank + future-focused closing]
[Sign-off with name/team]
Response Templates
Negative Review: Bug Report
Review: "App crashes every time I try to export. Waste of money. 1 star."
Response:
Hi [Name],
I'm really sorry about the export crashes — that's frustrating,
especially when you're trying to get work done.
We identified this issue and it's fixed in version X.X, which is
now available. If you update and still experience problems, please
reach out to [email protected] and we'll help you directly.
Thank you for taking the time to report this. It helps us improve.
— [Your Name], [App] Team
Negative Review: Missing Feature
Review: "No dark mode? In 2024? Uninstalled."
Response:
Hi there,
You're absolutely right — dark mode is important, and we hear you.
Good news: dark mode is in active development and planned for our
next major update. If you'd like to be notified when it's ready,
drop us a note at [email protected].
Thanks for the feedback. We hope to welcome you back soon!
— [Your Name], [App] Team
Negative Review: User Error (Diplomatic)
Review: "Can't figure out how to do X. Bad design."
Response:
Hi [Name],
Thanks for reaching out. I can see how [X] might not be obvious
at first — we could definitely make it clearer.
Quick tip: you can access [X] by [simple instructions]. We're also
adding an in-app tutorial in our next update to help with this.
If you're still stuck, email us at [email protected] and we'll
walk you through it.
— [Your Name], [App] Team
Negative Review: Pricing Complaint
Review: "Too expensive for what it does."
Response:
Hi [Name],
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on pricing. I understand — value
is important.
A few things that might help:
• We offer a free trial so you can test before committing
• The subscription includes [key benefits]
• We regularly run promotions — follow us @handle for updates
We're always working to add more value. If there's a specific
feature you'd find worth the price, we'd love to hear about it.
— [Your Name], [App] Team
Negative Review: Generic/Vague
Review: "Doesn't work. Terrible app."
Response:
Hi there,
I'm sorry to hear you're having trouble. We'd really like to help,
but need a bit more info to figure out what's going wrong.
Could you email us at [email protected] with:
• What you were trying to do
• What happened instead
• Your device and iOS version
We respond quickly and will do our best to get you sorted.
— [Your Name], [App] Team
Positive Review: With Feature Request
Review: "Love this app! Would be perfect if it had X."
Response:
Thank you so much for the kind words! 🙏
Great suggestion on [X] — you're not the first to ask, and it's
on our roadmap. Can't promise exact timing, but it's coming.
If you have other ideas, we're all ears at [email protected].
Thanks for being a [App] user!
— [Your Name]
Positive Review: Simple Thanks
Review: "Great app, use it every day. 5 stars!"
Response:
Thank you! Reviews like this make our day. We're glad [App] is
helping you. If you ever need anything, we're here!
— The [App] Team
After Fixing a Bug
Review: [Previously reported bug]
Follow-up Response:
Hi [Name],
Quick update: the [issue] you reported has been fixed in version
X.X, now available in the App Store.
Thank you again for letting us know — you helped us make [App]
better for everyone.
If you get a chance to try the update, we'd love to know if it
resolved things for you.
— [Your Name], [App] Team
Tone Guidelines
Always
- Be genuinely helpful
- Stay professional but warm
- Take responsibility (never blame user)
- Be specific (not generic)
- Keep it concise
Never
- Be defensive or argumentative
- Make excuses
- Ignore valid criticism
- Use corporate jargon
- Copy-paste identical responses
- Promise specific timelines you can't keep
Tone by Situation
| Situation | Tone |
|---|---|
| Bug report | Apologetic, solution-focused |
| Feature request | Appreciative, forward-looking |
| Confusion | Helpful, educational |
| Angry review | Calm, empathetic |
| Positive review | Grateful, personable |
Difficult Situations
Abusive Reviews
Don't respond. Report to Apple instead if it violates guidelines — profanity, hate speech, personal attacks, or clear spam.
Competitor Attacks
Signs of competitor spam:
- Multiple similar reviews at once
- No specific details
- Account has reviewed many competing apps
- Unrealistic claims
Action: Report to Apple, don't engage.
Impossible to Satisfy
Some users can't be pleased. After one genuine attempt:
- Don't keep responding
- Document for your records
- Move on
Legal Threats
If a review contains legal threats:
- Don't respond publicly
- Consult with legal
- Document everything
Metrics to Track
Response Metrics
- Response rate (aim for 100% of actionable)
- Response time (aim for <48 hours)
- Follow-up conversion (ratings changed after response)
Review Health
- Average rating trend
- Review volume
- Sentiment analysis
- Common themes
Workflow
Daily (5 minutes)
- Check for new reviews
- Flag urgent issues (bugs, crashes)
- Respond to critical reviews
Weekly (15 minutes)
- Respond to remaining reviews
- Track themes and patterns
- Share feedback with team
Monthly (30 minutes)
- Analyze rating trends
- Update response templates if needed
- Report key feedback to product team
Quick Reference
Response Length
- Ideal: 50-100 words
- Maximum: 150 words
- Never: Wall of text
Sign-off Options
- "— The [App] Team"
- "— [Name], [App] Support"
- "— [Name], Founder of [App]"
Contact Options to Offer
- [email protected]
- In-app support chat
- @TwitterHandle
- yourapp.com/help
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most docs writing skills give in ~1.8k tokens
Counted across 1,951 of the 3,904 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06
- Use third-person for skill descriptionsin 54 of 1951, across 35 files
- Start descriptions with Use whenin 43 of 1951, across 29 files
- Run baseline scenarios before writing any skillin 40 of 1951, across 26 files
- Use active voicein 40 of 1951, across 36 files
- Map file responsibilities before defining tasksin 36 of 1951, across 29 files
- Use checkbox syntax for tracking stepsin 35 of 1951, across 27 files
- Ask one question at a timein 35 of 1951
- Offer execution options after saving the planin 33 of 1951, across 24 files
- Include complete code in every stepin 33 of 1951, across 27 files
- Design units with clear boundaries and interfacesin 31 of 1951, across 23 files
- Announce the skill usage at the startin 30 of 1951
- Verify agent compliance after adding the skillin 29 of 1951, across 17 files
Said here and by no other author read
- Follow up after fixing reported issues
- Report abusive or inappropriate reviews
- Move on after one genuine response attempt
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.