agentsclimarketplace

Agentic workflow designer

Skill rshade/finfocus/.github/skills/agentic-workflow-designer

FinOps CLI for Pulumi β€” projected costs, actual spend tracking, budget enforcement, and cost optimization for cloud infrastructure

Install
npx -y skills add rshade/finfocus --skill agentic-workflow-designer

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Conversational skill that interviews users to design new agentic workflows

SKILL.md

13.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Workflow Designer

Use this skill to run a structured interview with users who know their goal but not the workflow syntax yet, then generate one complete workflow .md file.

When to Use This Skill

Use this before .github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md when requirements are unclear or incomplete.

  • Use skills/agentic-workflow-designer/SKILL.md to discover and confirm requirements.
  • Use .github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md once requirements are clear and ready for implementation.
  • Use .github/aw/agentic-chat.md when the user wants a specification/pseudo-code instead of a runnable workflow file.

Interview Framework

Ask one question at a time. Move to the next phase only after the current phase is clear.

Phase 1: Goal

Ask: "What do you want to automate?"

Capture:

  • Workflow name (kebab-case candidate)
  • Brief description
  • Optional emoji

Phase 2: Trigger

Ask: "When should this run?"

Follow up only if needed:

  • Which event type(s)?
  • Any filters (labels, branches, commands)?
  • Scheduled cadence (daily/weekly/hourly)?

Map to the on: block.

Phase 3: Scope (Read/Write)

Ask:

  • "What should it read?" (issues, PRs, code, discussions, CI data)
  • "What should it create or update?" (comments, issues, PRs, labels)

Map to:

  • permissions: (keep read-only for agent job)
  • tools:
  • safe-outputs:

Phase 4: Data Strategy

Ask:

  • "What data does the agent need to make decisions?"
  • Follow up: "Can we pre-fetch and aggregate that data with shell commands so the agent only reads compact JSON?"

Capture:

  • Whether steps: should pre-fetch GitHub data with gh + jq
  • Output paths under /tmp/gh-aw/data/
  • Whether batch work should use sub-agents

Map to:

  • steps:
  • Prompt references to pre-computed file paths

Phase 5: Guardrails

Ask: "Should it block merging, just advise, or silently log?"

Capture:

  • Visibility expectations (comment, issue, no visible output)
  • No-op behavior expectation

Guide toward safe output behavior and explicit noop instructions.

Phase 6: Context & Network

Ask: "Does it need external APIs, web access, package installs, or MCP servers?"

Follow up:

  • "Any third-party services or MCP servers to include (for example Slack, Jira, Datadog, custom internal MCP)?"
  • "Are you deploying on GitHub.com, GHEC with custom endpoints, or GHES?"
  • For each integration, identify required auth from source docs and map it to GitHub Actions secrets + workflow env variables.
  • Ask for exact external domains (FQDN/wildcard).

Map to:

  • network.allowed
  • Optional MCP/GitHub tool usage in tools:
  • secrets: / env: wiring for integration tokens
  • GHES/GHEC settings such as engine.api-target and aw.json ghes: true (when applicable)

Phase 7: Engine (optional)

Ask only if ambiguous: "Any AI engine preference?"

If no preference, suggest default:

  • "I'd suggest Copilot since you haven't mentioned a preference. Sound good?"

Map to engine: only when not default.

Phase 8: Confirmation

Present a structured summary and ask for approval before generation.

Decision Heuristics

Trigger Mapping

User says...Maps to
"when someone opens a PR"on: pull_request: with types: [opened]
"when a PR is updated"on: pull_request: with types: [opened, synchronize]
"every morning", "daily"fuzzy schedule shorthand on: schedule: daily on weekdays (compiler expands to cron)
"every Monday", "weekly"fuzzy schedule shorthand on: schedule: weekly (compiler expands to cron)
"when I say /review"on: slash_command: with name: review (or requested command)
"when an issue is labeled bug"on: issues: with types: [labeled] and label filter guidance
"run when label ai-review is added"on: label_command: with name/names, optional event scoping, and label-as-command semantics
"run on PRs from forks"on: pull_request: plus explicit forks: allowlist and fork security guardrails
"sometimes automatic, sometimes manual"semi-active pattern: combine schedule/event triggers with workflow_dispatch
"manually", "on demand"on: workflow_dispatch:
"when a deployment fails"on: deployment_status:
"when another workflow finishes"on: workflow_run:

Safe Output Mapping

User says...Maps to
"post a comment"add-comment
"create an issue"create-issue
"update issue title/body"update-issue
"close the issue"close-issue
"assign someone", "remove assignment"assign-to-user, unassign-from-user
"set issue type/field/milestone"set-issue-type, set-issue-field, assign-milestone
"open a PR", "submit changes"create-pull-request
"update PR description/title"update-pull-request
"close the PR", "merge the PR"close-pull-request, merge-pull-request
"mark PR ready", "sync PR branch"mark-pull-request-as-ready-for-review, update-branch
"commit a fix to the PR branch"push-to-pull-request-branch
"approve / request changes"submit-pull-request-review
"inline review comment", "reply to review thread"create-pull-request-review-comment, reply-to-pull-request-review-comment, resolve-pull-request-review-thread
"start or edit discussion", "close discussion"create-discussion, update-discussion, close-discussion
"request reviewer", "hide comment"add-reviewer, hide-comment
"create/update project", "project status update"create-project, update-project, create-project-status-update
"update release", "upload release asset"update-release, upload-asset
"create/auto-fix code scan alert"create-code-scanning-alert, autofix-code-scanning-alert
"start an agent session", "assign to an agent"create-agent-session, assign-to-agent
"store persistent memory comment"comment-memory
"link a sub-issue"link-sub-issue
"add labels", "remove labels"add-labels, remove-labels
"nothing visible", "just analyze"no safe outputs required

Network Mapping

User says...Maps to
"calls an external API"ask for exact FQDN/wildcard, then add to network.allowed
"installs npm packages"include node in network.allowed
"runs pip install"include python in network.allowed
"builds Go code"include go in network.allowed
"no external access"network.allowed: [defaults] (or [] if explicitly zero network)

Tool Mapping

User says...Maps to
"read GitHub issues/PRs/workflows"tools.github with mode: gh-proxy and minimal toolsets
"use full MCP server/tool definitions"tools.github with mode: local
"use other MCP servers but keep token cost down"tools.cli-proxy: true (hybrid CLI-proxy mode)
"edit files"edit tool (default unless restricted)
"run commands/tests"bash tool (default unless restricted)
"browse web pages/docs"web-fetch and/or web-search
"test UI flows"playwright

Pattern Heuristics

User says...Recommended named pattern
"triage issues automatically"IssueOps
"run on /commands with human approval loops"ChatOps
"run every weekday and keep improving"DailyOps
"monitor workflow failures and trends"MonitorOps
"process a big backlog in chunks"BatchOps
"run manually with input parameters"DispatchOps

Integration Auth Mapping

When the user names a third-party service or MCP server:

  1. Confirm whether native tool, MCP server, or safe-output job is the right integration path.
  2. Look up the integration's auth requirements and required scopes before finalizing the design.
  3. Provide a concrete setup checklist with:
    • required GitHub Actions secrets (names to create)
    • workflow env variables that consume those secrets
    • minimum token scopes/permissions needed

Output format to use:

Integration auth setup:
- <service-or-mcp>: <purpose>
  - Secrets to create: <SECRET_NAME>, <SECRET_NAME>
  - Workflow env vars: <ENV_VAR>=${{ secrets.<SECRET_NAME> }}
  - Required scopes/permissions: <least-privilege scopes>

Never suggest committing plaintext tokens.

Data Strategy Mapping

User says...Maps to
"analyze PRs", "review issues", "check status"add steps: that pre-fetch with gh + jq
"read the diff", "look at changed files"add steps: using gh pr diff or gh pr view --json files
"search for patterns across repos"add steps: using gh search + jq filters
"just respond to a comment"no pre-fetch needed (event payload is enough)
"process each item individually"suggest sub-agent pattern with model: small

Token Optimization Defaults

Apply these defaults unless the user explicitly asks otherwise:

  1. Use DataOps by default for GitHub reads: pre-fetch/aggregate with gh + jq in steps:, store compact JSON in /tmp/gh-aw/data/, and point the prompt to those files (see .github/aw/token-optimization.md for details).
  2. Keep tool surface minimal: default to tools.github.mode: gh-proxy, include only required toolsets, and prefer bash + gh for simple reads.
  3. For batch workloads, split items into compact data and suggest sub-agent processing with model: small.
  4. Keep prompts compact: concise imperative instructions, explicit file paths, single-line noop guidance, and stable instructions before dynamic content.

Progressive Disclosure Rules

  1. Never dump all options at once; ask one targeted question at a time.
  2. Skip questions when answers are inferable from prior user statements.
  3. Offer smart defaults and request confirmation instead of over-questioning.
  4. Ask at most 5 questions before presenting a summary; then ask "anything else?" if needed.
  5. Detect done signals (that's it, looks good, generate it) and proceed to generation.

Confirmation Format

Use this exact structure:

πŸ“‹ Proposed workflow:
- Name: <workflow-id>
- Trigger: <event + key options>
- Engine: <engine or default>
- Tools: <tool summary>
- Safe outputs: <list or none>
- Network: <allowed summary>
- Integrations/Auth: <service/mcp + required secrets/env vars>
- Deployment: <GitHub.com or GHEC/GHES details>
- Intent: <one-sentence task>

Then ask: "Ready to generate, or want to adjust anything?"

Generation Template

After confirmation, generate one workflow file using the same skeleton style as .github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md.

---
emoji: <emoji>
description: <brief description>
on:
  <trigger config>
permissions:
  contents: read
  issues: read
  pull-requests: read
tools:
  github:
    mode: gh-proxy
    toolsets: [default]
steps:
  - name: <optional data prefetch>
    run: |
      mkdir -p /tmp/gh-aw/data
      <gh + jq commands that produce compact JSON>
safe-outputs:
  <safe-output-types-if-needed>
network:
  allowed:
    - defaults
    - <additional entries if needed>
---

# <Workflow Name>

## Task

<clear instructions tied to trigger context>
If `steps:` includes pre-fetch commands, read the resulting `/tmp/gh-aw/data/*.json` files instead of broad live re-fetches.

## Safe Outputs

- Use configured safe outputs for all visible write actions.
- Call `noop` with a short reason when no action is needed.

Validation Checklist

Before final output, run this internal self-check:

  • Agent job permissions remain read-only (writes only via safe outputs)
  • safe-outputs: covers every write action mentioned in prompt/instructions
  • Network access is scoped; avoid blanket wildcard entries
  • Trigger matches the user's intended activation event
  • Prompt instructs agent to call noop when no action is needed
  • Unnecessary defaults are omitted (for example engine: copilot)
  • If reading GitHub data, steps: pre-fetches compact JSON (DataOps)
  • tools.github.mode is gh-proxy unless broader MCP toolsets are explicitly needed
  • Only required toolsets are listed (avoid blanket toolset lists)
  • Prompt references specific pre-computed file paths
  • For batch processing (>5 items), sub-agent pattern is suggested
  • For each third-party service/MCP integration, required secrets/env vars are listed
  • Auth guidance includes least-privilege token scope recommendations
  • For GHEC/GHES deployments, engine.api-target and GHES compatibility guidance are included when needed

References (load only when needed)

In-repo references:

  • .github/aw/syntax.md (index β†’ .github/aw/syntax-core.md, .github/aw/syntax-agentic.md, .github/aw/syntax-tools-imports.md)
  • .github/aw/safe-outputs.md (index β†’ .github/aw/safe-outputs-content.md, .github/aw/safe-outputs-management.md, .github/aw/safe-outputs-automation.md, .github/aw/safe-outputs-runtime.md)
  • .github/aw/network.md
  • .github/aw/patterns.md
  • .github/aw/subagents.md
  • .github/aw/token-optimization.md
  • .github/aw/triggers.md
  • .github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md

Portable HTTPS references:

  • https://github.com/github/gh-aw/blob/main/.github/aw/syntax.md (index β†’ .../syntax-core.md, .../syntax-agentic.md, .../syntax-tools-imports.md)
  • https://github.com/github/gh-aw/blob/main/.github/aw/safe-outputs.md (index β†’ .../safe-outputs-content.md, .../safe-outputs-management.md, .../safe-outputs-automation.md, .../safe-outputs-runtime.md)
  • https://github.com/github/gh-aw/blob/main/.github/aw/network.md
  • https://github.com/github/gh-aw/blob/main/.github/aw/patterns.md
  • https://github.com/github/gh-aw/blob/main/.github/aw/triggers.md
  • https://github.com/github/gh-aw/blob/main/.github/aw/create-agentic-workflow.md

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.