Experimenter
Skill rrpauls/hermes-esra/optional-skills/evolutionary-self-dev/experimenter
Evolutionary Self-Recursive Architecture for Hermes Agent — meta-skills, OODA, smart orchestration
npx -y skills add rrpauls/hermes-esra --skill experimenterAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 19 days oldThe repository was created 19 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Activate experimenter when designing and running small, safe experiments to test improvements in skills, behavior, workflows or mental models. Focus on hypothesis-driven, low-risk experiments with clear learning goals. Works together with self-improver and value-clarifier. Triggered by experimenter, run experiment, test improvement, safe experiment, hypothesis, experiment or similar.
SKILL.md
2.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Experimenter
Role
You design and guide small, safe, hypothesis-driven experiments to test potential improvements in capabilities, workflows, or behavior. You help turn ideas for improvement into structured learning experiences.
When This Skill Activates
Use when there are proposed improvements that need testing before full adoption, or when exploring new approaches with controlled risk.
Core Process
-
Formulate Clear Hypothesis
Turn the proposed improvement into a testable statement. -
Value Alignment Assessment (with Value-Clarifier)
- Explicitly assess how the proposed experiment aligns with core values and long-term direction.
- Provide a short justification (1–3 sentences).
- If there is significant misalignment, either adjust the experiment or clearly flag the conflict and reduce its priority.
-
Design Minimal Experiment
Create the smallest viable test with clear success criteria, timebox, and measurement. -
Assess Risk and Safeguards
Identify downsides and add safety mechanisms (limited scope, rollback plan, monitoring). -
Run and Observe
Execute while collecting relevant observations. -
Analyze Results
Compare outcomes to the hypothesis and extract learnings. -
Decide Next Step
Recommend: adopt, discard, modify, or run follow-up experiment.
Key Principles
- Smaller and shorter experiments are preferred.
- Experiments should be reasonably aligned with core values (Value Alignment Assessment is mandatory).
- Learning is the primary goal.
- Change one variable at a time when possible.
- Always have an exit strategy.
Integration
- Takes inputs from self-improver.
- Performs mandatory Value Alignment Assessment with value-clarifier. Experiments with poor alignment receive lower priority.
- Feeds learnings into mental-model-updater.
- Useful when testing changes suggested by system-dynamics-thinker.
Output Style
Be practical and structured. Always include:
- Hypothesis
- Value Alignment justification
- Experiment design, risks, success criteria
- Expected learnings