Writing guidelines
Apply clear-writing standards to any prose the agent produces - READMEs, docs, UI copy, error messages, commit and PR text, release notes. Use when writing or editing documentation, interface copy, or any text a human will read. Says "write the README", "improve this copy", "draft the docs", "word this error".From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add rohitg00/pro-workflow --skill writing-guidelinesAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
SKILL.md
2.3 KB, 495 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
writing-guidelines
Write for a reader who is busy and did not see your work. Readability beats cleverness; clarity beats completeness.
Rules
- Lead with the outcome. The first sentence answers what happened or what the thing is - the line the reader would ask for if they said "just the TLDR". Supporting detail comes after.
- Cut filler. Delete "just", "simply", "basically", "in order to", "it is important to note". If a sentence changes nothing when removed, remove it.
- Concrete over abstract. Name the file, the number, the command. "Faster" is weaker than "cuts the build from 40s to 9s".
- Active voice, one idea per sentence. Short sentences that each carry one point read faster than long ones that carry three.
- Consistent terms. Use the project's own vocabulary, the same word for the
same thing every time. Tie names to the shared-language
CONTEXT.mdwhen one exists (seedomain-modeling). - Readable, not clipped. Being short and being clear are different. Achieve
short by dropping what the reader does not need, not by compressing prose into
fragments, arrow chains (
A -> B -> fails), or invented abbreviations.
Error messages and UI copy
- Say what happened and what to do next:
Config not found at ./app.config.ts. Create it or pass --config <path>.beatsError: config missing. - No dead ends. Every failure names a next step.
- Match the product's voice; drop exclamation marks and filler enthusiasm.
AI-slop tells to strip
- Em-dashes and en-dashes - use a spaced hyphen or a full stop. This is the most reliable machine-written tell.
- Hollow openers: "In today's fast-paced world", "It's worth noting that".
- Hedging stacks: "might potentially perhaps".
- Binary flourishes: "Not X. But Y." as a rhetorical beat.
- Over-structured lists where a sentence would do.
Output
When editing, show the tightened version and, on request, a one-line note per change. Do not pad the edit with praise for the original.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most readme changelog skills give in 495 tokens
Counted across 446 of the 460 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06
- Follow Keep a Changelog formatin 24 of 446
- Collect commits since the last git tagin 15 of 446, across 13 files
- Omit empty sectionsin 14 of 446
- Put breaking changes first with migration stepsin 14 of 446
- Include migration guidance for breaking changesin 11 of 446, across 10 files
- Categorize commits by conventional commit prefixin 11 of 446
- Mark breaking changes prominentlyin 10 of 446
- Prepend the new entry to CHANGELOG.mdin 9 of 446
- Highlight breaking changes with migration notesin 8 of 446, across 7 files
- Classify changes into Keep a Changelog categoriesin 8 of 446, across 7 files
- Group related commits into single entriesin 8 of 446
- Write the changelog from commitsin 8 of 446
Said here and by no other author read
- Delete filler words and sentences that change nothing
- Prefer concrete names, numbers, and commands over abstractions
- Use the project's own vocabulary consistently
- Say what happened and what to do next
- Give every failure a next step
- Strip hollow openers, hedging stacks, binary flourishes, over-structured lists
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.