Llm gate
Claude Code learns from your corrections: self-correcting memory that compounds over 50+ sessions. Context engineering, parallel worktrees, agent teams, and 17 battle-tested skills.
npx -y skills add rohitg00/pro-workflow --skill llm-gateAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
LLM-powered quality verification using prompt hooks. Validates commit messages, code patterns, and conventions using AI before allowing operations. Use to set up intelligent guardrails.
SKILL.md
3.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
LLM Gate
Use Claude Code's type: "prompt" hooks to create intelligent quality gates that use AI to verify operations.
Trigger
Use when:
- Setting up commit message validation
- Enforcing code conventions beyond what linters catch
- Creating smart guardrails for specific operations
How Prompt Hooks Work
Claude Code supports hooks with type: "prompt" that run a small LLM (Haiku by default) to verify conditions:
{
"PreToolUse": [{
"matcher": "Bash",
"hooks": [{
"type": "prompt",
"if": "Bash(git commit*)",
"prompt": "Check if this git commit follows conventional commit format (<type>(<scope>): <summary>). The commit command is: $ARGUMENTS. Return {\"ok\": true} if valid, {\"ok\": false, \"reason\": \"...\"} if not.",
"model": "haiku",
"timeout": 15
}]
}]
}
The hook:
- Substitutes
$ARGUMENTSwith the JSON hook input - Sends to Haiku (fast, cheap)
- Expects
{"ok": true}or{"ok": false, "reason": "..."} - If not ok → blocks the tool call with the reason
Example Gates
Conventional Commit Validator
{
"type": "prompt",
"if": "Bash(git commit*)",
"prompt": "Verify this git commit follows conventional commits: type(scope): summary. Types: feat,fix,refactor,test,docs,chore,perf,ci. Summary under 72 chars. Input: $ARGUMENTS",
"model": "haiku"
}
Destructive Command Guard
{
"type": "prompt",
"if": "Bash(rm *)",
"prompt": "Check if this rm command is safe. Flag if it uses -rf on important directories (src/, node_modules/, .git/). Input: $ARGUMENTS",
"model": "haiku"
}
API Key Leak Prevention
{
"type": "prompt",
"matcher": "Write",
"prompt": "Check if this file write contains hardcoded API keys, secrets, passwords, or tokens. Input: $ARGUMENTS. Return ok:false if secrets found.",
"model": "haiku"
}
Agent Hooks
For complex verification, use type: "agent" (runs a full agent):
{
"type": "agent",
"if": "Bash(git push*)",
"prompt": "Review all staged changes for security issues before pushing. Check for: hardcoded secrets, SQL injection, XSS vulnerabilities, exposed internal URLs.",
"model": "haiku",
"timeout": 60
}
Setup Guide
- Choose which operations to gate
- Write the prompt (keep it focused, under 100 words)
- Pick the model (haiku for speed, sonnet for accuracy)
- Set timeout (15s for prompts, 60s for agents)
- Add to hooks.json under the appropriate event
Rules
- Use Haiku for simple checks (fast, cheap)
- Use Sonnet only for complex analysis
- Keep prompts under 100 words for reliability
- Always include
ifcondition to avoid running on every tool call - Set reasonable timeouts (15s prompt, 60s agent)
- Test hooks before deploying to avoid blocking workflows