agentsclimarketplace

Jinba workflow automator

Skill riteshkew/yc-skills/skills/jinba-workflow-automator

Catalog of all 198 YC Winter 2026 companies + 18 working Claude Code Skills inspired by the ones an open-source tool can replicate. Inspired by, not affiliated with.

Install
npx -y skills add riteshkew/yc-skills --skill jinba-workflow-automator

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Given a natural-language description of an enterprise workflow, emit a structured JSON automation definition with trigger, ordered steps, conditional branching, and tool/integration mappings — ready to wire into n8n, Temporal, or Zapier.

SKILL.md

5.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Workflow

When this skill is invoked, the user provides a plain-English description of an enterprise automation they want to build. Your job is to parse that description and emit a complete, structured JSON automation definition that a developer can import into a real execution engine.

This skill produces the definition only. Runtime execution, credential provisioning, and deployment to an engine like n8n, Temporal, or Zapier are out of scope for v1 — that is the productionization gap the developer bridges after receiving this scaffold.

Step 1 — Parse the natural-language workflow description

Read the user's description carefully and extract every distinct component:

  • Trigger: What event starts the workflow? Identify the source system (e.g., Google Sheets row added, webhook POST, cron schedule, form submission) and the specific event type.
  • Steps: List every distinct action in order. Each sentence or clause describing an action is typically one step.
  • Conditions / branching: Identify any "if X then Y" logic. Note the condition expression and which steps it gates.
  • Tools and integrations: For each step, identify the third-party service or API it requires (e.g., Clearbit for enrichment, HubSpot for CRM, Slack for notification, SendGrid for email).
  • Data flow: Note which outputs from earlier steps feed into later steps as inputs.

If the description is ambiguous, resolve it conservatively: create a step, mark the field "{{PLACEHOLDER}}", and add a comment in the step's name field noting the assumption.

Step 2 — Map each step to a named tool and action

For every step identified in Step 1, assign:

  • tool: the named integration (use the canonical service name in snake_case, e.g., google_sheets, hubspot, slack, sendgrid, clearbit, salesforce, jira, github)
  • action: the specific API operation (e.g., crm_create_contact, slack_post_message, send_email, http_request)
  • inputs: the parameters the action requires, using {{trigger.row.field_name}} for trigger data, {{step_N.outputs.field}} for upstream step outputs, and {{env.VAR_NAME}} for secrets/config

Use on_error values from this set: halt_and_notify (hard failure, stop the run), continue (soft failure, proceed), continue_with_empty (treat output as empty and continue), retry_3x (retry up to 3 times before halting).

Step 3 — Construct the JSON automation definition

Emit a single JSON object with this top-level shape:

{
  "name": "<human-readable workflow name>",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "description": "<one-sentence summary>",
  "trigger": { "type", "source", "event", "config": { ... } },
  "steps": [
    {
      "id": "step_N_<slug>",
      "name": "<human-readable name>",
      "action": "<action_type>",
      "tool": "<tool_id>",
      "depends_on": ["<step_id>", ...],
      "condition": "<optional expression — omit if unconditional>",
      "inputs": { ... },
      "outputs": { ... },
      "on_error": "<policy>"
    }
  ],
  "conditions": [
    {
      "id": "cond_<slug>",
      "description": "<plain-English explanation of the condition>",
      "expression": "<template expression>",
      "applied_to_steps": ["<step_id>", ...]
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "id": "<tool_id>",
      "type": "<trigger_source | enrichment | crm | notification | email | storage | ...>",
      "auth_env_var": "<ENV_VAR_NAME>",
      "docs": "<canonical API docs URL>"
    }
  ],
  "env_vars_required": ["VAR_1", "VAR_2", ...],
  "execution_note": "This is a scaffold definition only. Wire it to n8n, Temporal, or Zapier to execute."
}

The output must be pure valid JSON — no Markdown fences, no prose before or after, no comments inside the JSON.

Step 4 — Self-check before emitting

Before outputting, verify:

  • Every step referenced in conditions[].applied_to_steps has a matching id in steps[]
  • Every depends_on entry references a real step id defined earlier in the array
  • Every {{env.VAR}} used in inputs is listed in env_vars_required
  • Every tool used in a step has an entry in the tools array
  • The trigger.source value matches the id of a tool in tools[] (type trigger_source)
  • The document is syntactically valid JSON — no trailing commas, no single-quoted strings

If any check fails, fix it before emitting.

Example

See examples/input.md for a sample natural-language workflow request (Google Sheets → Clearbit enrichment → HubSpot contact + deal → Slack notification → conditional VP email).

See examples/output.md for the complete JSON automation definition that faithfully encodes that workflow.

The example demonstrates:

  • A row-added trigger on Google Sheets
  • A continue_with_empty enrichment step (Clearbit may not match every domain)
  • Two sequential CRM steps with depends_on chaining
  • A Slack notification with inline template expressions combining trigger data and upstream step outputs
  • A conditional email step gated on estimated_deal_size > 50000
  • Full tools[] manifest and env_vars_required list for developer handoff

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most automation workflows skills give

Counted across 745 of the 1,008 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-06

  • write conventional commit messagesin 36 of 745, across 35 files
  • delete branches after mergein 30 of 745, across 21 files
  • make atomic commitsin 25 of 745, across 15 files
  • write minimal code to pass testsin 22 of 745, across 10 files
  • run tests before committingin 21 of 745, across 13 files
  • re-snapshot after navigation or DOM changesin 21 of 745, across 13 files
  • use try-catch for error handlingin 20 of 745, across 6 files
  • write tests before implementationin 20 of 745, across 8 files
  • configure branch protection rulesin 19 of 745, across 5 files
  • explain the why in commit messagesin 19 of 745, across 9 files
  • refactor code while tests remain greenin 19 of 745, across 6 files
  • Interact with elements using refsin 19 of 745, across 11 files

Said here and by no other author read

  • extract workflow components from text
  • resolve ambiguous descriptions conservatively
  • mark ambiguous fields as placeholder
  • assign named tool and action per step
  • emit a single json object
  • validate references before emitting

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.