agentsclimarketplace

Relex citations

Skill relexyou/relex-claude/plugin/skills/relex-citations

Use whenever legal authority is cited, quoted, or relied on in Relex work — drafts, memos, ontology issues, research notes, any jurisdiction. Teaches the three-tier epistemic labeling (secured / verify / never-use), the hard citation locks, and the minimum-data citation schema that keep hallucinated law out of legal work.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add relexyou/relex-claude --skill relex-citations

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

4.6 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Citation Discipline: No Blind Citations

Community legal packs audited themselves and found ~30% of their own memorized docket numbers were wrong. The cure is mechanical, not aspirational: label every assertion's epistemic tier, obey the hard locks, and ground filing-grade citations in cached verbatim text (relex-research).

The three tiers — label everything you assert

  1. Secured — quotable and filing-grade. Only: text in the Relex verbatim cache, the user's own documents, or an official source you (or the harness) fetched live this session. Cite normally.
  2. Plausible — verify — you believe it from context or memory but it is not secured. Flag inline: [verify: <what to check, where>]. A draft may carry [verify] flags only in internal work product — never in anything that leaves the practice; those become directives (POST /research/scrape).
  3. Never-use — from model memory alone: docket/file numbers, ECLI strings, commentary margin numbers, page/paragraph pinpoints, verbatim quotes, database identifiers. Do not write them even with a flag. Encode the authority as an anchor instead (below) and acquire.

Marking tier 2/3 honestly is clean lawyerly practice, not weakness.

Hard locks (non-negotiable)

  • No proprietary blind cites. Never emit a paywalled-database locator (BeckRS, juris, Westlaw/Lexis pin cites, La Ley…) from memory. Only if the user supplied it or a licensed live source verified it. When one appears in inherited text and can't be verified: extract court/date/docket, find the free official source, else replace with [proprietary locator removed — verify against a free official source].
  • No citation without minimum data. A case citation needs court + decision form + date + docket/neutral cite + a free, checkable source; a pinpoint (para/margin number) only from the source itself.
  • Renamed/moved-source traps. Sources get renamed, re-numbered, consolidated (commentaries change editors; statutes get recodified; transpositions land). If your knowledge of a source predates today, verify the source still exists under that name/number before citing it.
  • Statute first. Norm text → then verified case law → literature only when supplied or live-verified.
  • Topic-match check. Before attaching any authority: does the holding actually support the proposition? A real citation for the wrong proposition is still a false citation.
  • No deadline from memory — hard lock; the canonical deadline rule lives in relex-matter (compute from the secured norm text, flag for human verification).

Anchors, not memorized citations

When you know the line of jurisprudence but not a secured citation, write an anchor and acquire:

<topic/line> — <probable court/bench> — verify in <official free source>
e.g. "constructive dismissal; hearing duty — Federal Labour Court, 2nd senate
      (line since mid-2000s) — verify in the court's official database"

Anchors are honest retrieval keys — they contain nothing to hallucinate.

Citation schema by family (one line each; jurisdiction packs carry detail)

  • US — Bluebook; controlling vs persuasive marked; pin cites from source.
  • UK — OSCOLA + neutral citation.
  • DE — court, form, date, Aktenzeichen (+ECLI), source, Rn. from source; no stare-decisis framing (§ 31 BVerfGG aside).
  • CH — BGE/ATF volume-part-page + consideration (E.); unpublished by docket.
  • FR — court, chamber, date, n° pourvoi; ECLI where available.
  • IT/ES/RO — court, section, number/year (+ECLI where issued).
  • EU — case number + name + ECLI.
  • CA — McGill Guide + neutral citation. JP — court, date, reporter.
  • AU — AGLC4 + neutral citation.

In Relex specifically

  • The server verifier rejects drafts citing law without cached verbatim text — when it does, that's a grounding gap: issue the directive, re-reason.
  • Record grounded issues in the ontology with their ground ("settled — grounded by cached § 823 BGB text"), so the understanding carries its evidence.
  • Official-source whitelist per jurisdiction lives in ../jurisdictions/*.md; finding aids (aggregators) are for finding, the citation names the official source.

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,764. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.