Relex citations
Use whenever legal authority is cited, quoted, or relied on in Relex work — drafts, memos, ontology issues, research notes, any jurisdiction. Teaches the three-tier epistemic labeling (secured / verify / never-use), the hard citation locks, and the minimum-data citation schema that keep hallucinated law out of legal work.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add relexyou/relex-claude --skill relex-citationsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
4.6 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Citation Discipline: No Blind Citations
Community legal packs audited themselves and found ~30% of their own memorized
docket numbers were wrong. The cure is mechanical, not aspirational: label every
assertion's epistemic tier, obey the hard locks, and ground filing-grade
citations in cached verbatim text (relex-research).
The three tiers — label everything you assert
- Secured — quotable and filing-grade. Only: text in the Relex verbatim cache, the user's own documents, or an official source you (or the harness) fetched live this session. Cite normally.
- Plausible — verify — you believe it from context or memory but it is not
secured. Flag inline:
[verify: <what to check, where>]. A draft may carry[verify]flags only in internal work product — never in anything that leaves the practice; those become directives (POST /research/scrape). - Never-use — from model memory alone: docket/file numbers, ECLI strings, commentary margin numbers, page/paragraph pinpoints, verbatim quotes, database identifiers. Do not write them even with a flag. Encode the authority as an anchor instead (below) and acquire.
Marking tier 2/3 honestly is clean lawyerly practice, not weakness.
Hard locks (non-negotiable)
- No proprietary blind cites. Never emit a paywalled-database locator
(BeckRS, juris, Westlaw/Lexis pin cites, La Ley…) from memory. Only if the
user supplied it or a licensed live source verified it. When one appears in
inherited text and can't be verified: extract court/date/docket, find the
free official source, else replace with
[proprietary locator removed — verify against a free official source]. - No citation without minimum data. A case citation needs court + decision form + date + docket/neutral cite + a free, checkable source; a pinpoint (para/margin number) only from the source itself.
- Renamed/moved-source traps. Sources get renamed, re-numbered, consolidated (commentaries change editors; statutes get recodified; transpositions land). If your knowledge of a source predates today, verify the source still exists under that name/number before citing it.
- Statute first. Norm text → then verified case law → literature only when supplied or live-verified.
- Topic-match check. Before attaching any authority: does the holding actually support the proposition? A real citation for the wrong proposition is still a false citation.
- No deadline from memory — hard lock; the canonical deadline rule lives in
relex-matter(compute from the secured norm text, flag for human verification).
Anchors, not memorized citations
When you know the line of jurisprudence but not a secured citation, write an anchor and acquire:
<topic/line> — <probable court/bench> — verify in <official free source>
e.g. "constructive dismissal; hearing duty — Federal Labour Court, 2nd senate
(line since mid-2000s) — verify in the court's official database"
Anchors are honest retrieval keys — they contain nothing to hallucinate.
Citation schema by family (one line each; jurisdiction packs carry detail)
- US — Bluebook; controlling vs persuasive marked; pin cites from source.
- UK — OSCOLA + neutral citation.
- DE — court, form, date, Aktenzeichen (+ECLI), source, Rn. from source; no stare-decisis framing (§ 31 BVerfGG aside).
- CH — BGE/ATF volume-part-page + consideration (E.); unpublished by docket.
- FR — court, chamber, date, n° pourvoi; ECLI where available.
- IT/ES/RO — court, section, number/year (+ECLI where issued).
- EU — case number + name + ECLI.
- CA — McGill Guide + neutral citation. JP — court, date, reporter.
- AU — AGLC4 + neutral citation.
In Relex specifically
- The server verifier rejects drafts citing law without cached verbatim text — when it does, that's a grounding gap: issue the directive, re-reason.
- Record grounded issues in the ontology with their ground ("settled — grounded by cached § 823 BGB text"), so the understanding carries its evidence.
- Official-source whitelist per jurisdiction lives in
../jurisdictions/*.md; finding aids (aggregators) are for finding, the citation names the official source.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.