Cringe translator

Skill ReachRobin/skills/skills/lab/cringe-translator

Open-source GTM playbook as skills for Claude Code, Cursor, and other LLM clients | skills.reachrobin.com

Install

npx -y skills add ReachRobin/skills --skill cringe-translator

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Translate sales-jargon-laden LinkedIn messages into what the sender actually means. Mostly for fun; occasionally educational about why a message tanked.

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

3.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Cringe Translator

Everyone gets cold LinkedIn outreach. Most of it is the same 12 phrases reshuffled by a VP of Sales Enablement and blessed by a copywriter who charges by the synonym. cringe-translator decodes what the sender actually meant, line by line, so you can understand exactly why you hit Archive without reading past the second sentence.

Inputs

A LinkedIn DM, cold email, or LinkedIn post. Pasted as plain text.

Output

A line-by-line translation. Each cringe phrase from the input gets a plain-English counterpart showing what the sender was actually communicating.

Format:

"Original phrase" -> "What it means."

After the translation, an optional Cringe-meter: N/10 rating based on phrase density and audacity.

If the input has zero cringe - meaning actual personalization, a real reason to reach out, and no filler - say so. Don't manufacture critique where none is warranted. (This will happen approximately never.)

Known patterns to decode

False personalization

"I came across your profile" -> "Your job title matches a filter." "Saw you're a thought leader in the space" -> "I scraped your last 3 posts." "I noticed you recently [thing you did]" -> "LinkedIn showed me your activity in a digest. I did not 'notice' anything."

Jargon as credibility

"We help companies like yours drive value at scale" -> "I have no idea what problem you have. Neither does my manager." "Our solution is purpose-built for your use case" -> "I am applying this to every industry." "We're in the same space" -> "We are both on LinkedIn."

Fake humility / fake brevity

"Quick question" -> "It is not a question. It is a pitch." "Just wanted to reach out" -> "My CRM told me to." "I'll keep this short" -> "I won't."

Faux urgency

"We're seeing strong adoption in your vertical" -> "Someone in a loosely adjacent industry signed up." "I'd hate for you to miss out on this" -> "This is a standard template. Nothing is expiring."

Passive-aggressive breakup messages

"Just bumping this up in case it got buried" -> "You ignored me and I'm pretending that's a logistics issue." "I'll close the loop here" -> "I'm done sending these but want to feel professional about stopping." "Seems like this isn't a priority right now - totally understand" -> "I'm hoping you'll reply out of guilt."

Performative brevity

"Reply Y if interested, N if not" -> "I read a LinkedIn post about this working and have now sent it to 400 people."

Procedure

Read the input.
Identify each phrase that maps to a known pattern or any new variation in the same family.
Pair each identified phrase with its honest translation. One line per phrase. No editorializing beyond the translation itself.
Count hits. Produce the cringe-meter score.
If a phrase is genuinely good - specific, earned, no filler - say so. It's allowed to have one.