agentsclimarketplace

Planner

Skill Razaib-khan/ForgeWeave/src/forgeweave/templates/qwen/.qwen/skills/planner

Converts user intent into structured execution plans, including steps, dependencies, risks, and required toolsFrom its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add Razaib-khan/ForgeWeave --skill planner

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

2.7 KB, 562 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Planner

Purpose

Transform vague, high-level user intent into a concrete, actionable execution plan. Breaks down complex goals into ordered steps, identifies dependencies, assesses risks, and determines which tools or agents are needed at each stage.

When to Use

  • The user says "I want to build X" or "implement Y" without specifying how
  • Multiple steps are needed and the order matters
  • Different parts of the task require different tools or skills
  • The task has dependencies that must be resolved in sequence

When Not to Use

  • The user has already given step-by-step instructions — execute directly
  • The task is a single, well-defined action (e.g., "rename this function")
  • The task is purely research — use deep-research or quick-research

Inputs

InputTypeRequiredDescription
goalstringYesWhat the user wants to accomplish
contextstringNoProject context, constraints, or existing work
available_skillsarrayNoWhich skills are available for execution

Expected Outputs

A structured plan containing:

  • Goal restatement (clarified)
  • Ordered steps with dependencies
  • Required tools or skills per step
  • Risk assessment per step
  • Estimated complexity

Exact Workflow Steps

  1. Clarify the goal by restating it and asking for confirmation if ambiguous
  2. Decompose into ordered, atomic steps
  3. Identify dependencies between steps (blocking, parallel, sequential)
  4. Map each step to required tools, skills, or agents
  5. Assess risks per step (e.g., "this step may break existing tests")
  6. Present the plan for user approval before execution

Required Checks

  • Goal is clarified and unambiguous
  • Steps are ordered with dependencies identified
  • Each step maps to an available tool or skill
  • Risks are documented

Failure Modes

Failure ConditionResponse
Goal is too vague to decomposeAsk clarifying questions iteratively
No available skill covers a stepReport as uncovered and suggest creating a new skill
Steps have circular dependenciesRestructure to break the cycle

Examples

Example: "Build a CLI tool"

Plan: 1) Choose framework (argparse/click/typer), 2) Define commands, 3) Implement each command, 4) Add tests, 5) Write README

References

ReferencePath
Workflow Orchestrator skill../workflow-orchestrator/SKILL.md

What ships with it: 3 files

3.1 KB alongside SKILL.md, 1 of them executable

scripts/

templates/

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most plan spec skills give in 562 tokens

Counted across 1,099 of the 1,860 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07

  • Ask one question at a timein 51 of 1099
  • Break plans into vertical slicesin 29 of 1099, across 11 files
  • Publish issues in dependency orderin 27 of 1099, across 9 files
  • Iterate until user approves the breakdownin 25 of 1099, across 7 files
  • Explore the repository to understand the codebase statein 24 of 1099, across 7 files
  • Use domain glossary vocabularyin 23 of 1099, across 5 files
  • Apply correct triage labels to published issuesin 23 of 1099, across 5 files
  • Prefer AFK slices over HITLin 22 of 1099, across 7 files
  • Write a specification before writing any codein 22 of 1099, across 14 files
  • Write failing tests before implementation codein 22 of 1099, across 20 files
  • Ask clarifying questions until requirements are concretein 21 of 1099, across 13 files
  • Respect existing architecture decision recordsin 20 of 1099, across 5 files

Said here and by no other author read

  • Decompose goal into ordered atomic steps
  • Map each step to required tools
  • Assess risks for each step
  • Ask questions iteratively if goal is too vague
  • Report steps with no matching skill as uncovered
  • Restructure steps to break circular dependencies

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,782. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.