agentsclimarketplace

Fusion deck

Skill raydocs/fusion-deck

A Claude Code skill that spends extra models only when the risk earns it. One hard question goes to Claude + GPT + Gemini blind and in parallel; Claude judges, and the panel that actually ran is disclosed. Plus plan / context / review / orchestrate / handoff workflows. Runs on the CLI subscriptions already on your machine.

Install
npx -y skills add raydocs/fusion-deck

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Higher-confidence answers and careful execution. `/fusion` fans a hard question to a panel of top models and writes one judged cross-checked answer; `/fusion-review` audits the same way. Companions: `/fusion-auto` `/fusion-ultra` `/fusion-investigate` `/fusion-plan` `/fusion-context` `/fusion-orchestrate` `/fusion-optimize` `/fusion-refactor` `/fusion-handoff` `/fusion-remind`. Always discloses which models answered. Use whenever the user wants a multi-model / panel / ensemble answer — e.g. "run it through fusion", "fusion-review this", "fusion-plan", "fusion-context", "fusion-orchestrate", "fusion-handoff". Best for high-stakes, contested, or hard-to-reverse work.

SKILL.md

10.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

fusion-deck

A premium decision-and-execution toolkit. It does two things well: think hard (fan a question out to the strongest models in parallel, blind, and let Claude (the session model) judge) and orchestrate (turn a vague ask into a verifiable contract, curate context, decompose into scoped subagent work, verify each step, and hand off cleanly). It is a Claude Code skill — markdown commands plus small bash/python helpers. There is no MCP server, no UI, no OpenRouter, no model-config platform.

The three lineages it fuses

It fuses three lineages — panel→judge (fusion-fable), contract+honesty (goal-meta; not Codex /goal), and context+orchestration (RepoPrompt CE) — see README → "The three lineages".

The panel and its honest-degrade rule

The PREMIUM panel is the full triple. Availability is reported by scripts/detect_panel.sh as a PANEL_STATE:

PANEL_STATEPanelSlug
PREMIUMClaude + GPT-5.6 Sol + Gemini 3.1 Pro (agy by default)claude-gpt5.6sol-gemini3.1pro
DEGRADED_CLAUDE_GPTClaude + GPT-5.6 Solclaude-gpt5.6sol
DEGRADED_CLAUDE_GEMINIClaude + Gemini 3.1 Proclaude-gemini3.1pro
CLAUDE_ONLYtwo cold Claude runsclaude-x2

The cardinal rule: never silently fake the premium triple. Premium commands call scripts/assert_triple_panel.sh, which hard-fails unless codex and a Gemini backend are present. An operator who knowingly wants a smaller panel sets FUSION_ALLOW_DEGRADED=1 — then the run proceeds but is loudly marked degraded. The rule holds at runtime too: if a panelist fails mid-run (rate limit, timeout of FUSION_PANEL_TIMEOUT, implausibly tiny output), the runner writes the honest manifest and exits 13 unless degrade was explicitly allowed — stop and disclose, never silently continue. Every panel answer must disclose the PANEL_STATE it actually ran. See references/degraded-mode.md.

Commands — and where the panel is worth its cost

A triple panel costs ~N× tokens and runs as slow as its slowest panelist. So fan out only where independent cross-checking changes the answer's risk profile; everywhere else, one model is correct.

CommandWhat it doesPanel by default?
/fusionFan a hard question to the panel; Claude judges and writes the answer. --wide adds a second cold Claude (4 panelists).Yes
/fusion-autoRoute a task through v2: pick workflow, verify, and escalate only when needed.Router decides
/fusion-ultraMax-quality two-round workflow: wide blind panel (Claude ×2 + GPT + Gemini) → contradiction matrix → targeted probes → verifier.Yes + targeted probes
/fusion-reviewAudit code/a plan via the panel; structured, cross-checked findings.Yes
/fusion-investigateEvidence-first root-cause investigation; panel adjudicates competing hypotheses.By exception — only when ≥2 hypotheses survive the evidence; --panel forces it
/fusion-planTurn a vague request into a Claude Code Workflow Contract; --deep adds involvement + a critique pass.No — single model; --panel to escalate a genuinely ambiguous, high-stakes planning question
/fusion-contextBuild a RepoPrompt-style Context Pack; --discover adds evidence-gated agentic curation.No — curation is mechanical
/fusion-orchestrateDecompose, dispatch scoped subagents, verify each, roll up; --worktrees isolates parallel items.No — single-model orchestrator; --panel to review a thorny decomposition
/fusion-optimizeMeasure→change→re-measure loop; the panel calls continue/stop at each decision point.By exception — only at the stop/continue decision points
/fusion-refactorStructure analysis → behavior-preserving plan → steer-one-agent execution.No — composes review/plan/orchestrate
/fusion-handoffEmit a Handoff Capsule.No — summarization
/fusion-remindRe-anchor a drifting session: cheat-sheet of situation→command + the invariants.No — pure recall

All twelve install as ~/.claude/commands/<name>.md wrappers (see README → Install); the whole skill is also invocable as /fusion-deck. (If a separate skill named fusion is also installed, that skill takes precedence for /fusion — this skill does not assume one is present.)

Each command file in commands/ is the procedure; it loads the matching references/*.md on demand.

Routing — match the situation to the command

When the user describes a situation instead of naming a command, map it to the fitting /fusion-* and offer it — they shouldn't have to know the catalogue. Suggest, don't silently run: the panel and orchestration commands cost quota and time, so name the command + why and let them say go. For a quick factual question, just answer directly — don't route a trivial ask into a panel.

<!-- SOURCE OF TRUTH for routing. On change: sync README.md EN + 中文 tables and commands/fusion-remind.md. -->
The user is…Offer
stuck on a hard call / trade-off, or wants one cross-checked/fusion
asking "choose the right fusion workflow for this" or wanting cheaper/faster unless risk says otherwise/fusion-auto
asking for maximum quality / strongest possible answer / hard high-risk decision/fusion-ultra
asking you to review code, a diff, or a plan before it ships/fusion-review
reporting a bug, or asking "why is it built like this / where does this come from"/fusion-investigate
handing you a vague, underspecified ask to build/fusion-plan (--deep for a full design doc)
about to send code to another model/agent, or working an unfamiliar repo/fusion-context (--discover to auto-curate)
asking for a big, multi-step change done carefully/fusion-orchestrate (--worktrees for parallel siblings)
asking to make something measurably faster / smaller / cheaper/fusion-optimize
asking to clean up or consolidate code without changing behavior/fusion-refactor
wrapping up and passing work on (to another agent or future-them)/fusion-handoff
drifting in a long session / a fresh agent needs the map and the invariants/fusion-remind

Compose, don't silo: a feature is usually /fusion-plan → /fusion-context → /fusion-orchestrate → /fusion-handoff; a bug is /fusion-investigate → /fusion-plan → /fusion-orchestrate. If two fit, prefer the cheaper/narrower one and say what the other would add.

Core invariants (do not violate)

  1. Never fake premium. Disclose the real PANEL_STATE; degrade only explicitly. (degraded-mode.md)
  2. Blind panel. Panelists never see each other's work; only the judge sees all answers, and only after every panelist returns. Claude always judges. (panel-prompt.md, judge-rubric.md)
  3. Orchestrator never implements. In /fusion-orchestrate, the orchestrator only plans, decomposes, delegates, and verifies; it reads files only to verify and makes all code changes inside Task subagents. One level of fan-out. (orchestration-rubric.md)
  4. Verify, then dispatch fresh. Check each item against its Done-when with a concrete probe (grep / read / test — not a skim) before moving on. Never proceed with unresolved gaps.
  5. v2 routes, it does not guess. /fusion-auto chooses a workflow only, writes a ledger entry, verifies when possible, and escalates by explicit policy. It does not replace /fusion's full-panel meaning.
  6. Contract, not /goal. /fusion-plan emits a Workflow Contract; scripts/lint_contract.py rejects any /goal reference. (workflow-contract.md, contract-lint-rules.md)
  7. Honesty path. Use the status states [todo]/[doing]/[done]/[blocked]/[incomplete]/[abandoned]; [incomplete] carries reason / proof / attempted / impact / next-decision. Report failures plainly.
  8. Safety. Never hardcode keys, accounts, or private paths; never leak secrets into a Context Pack; the smoke test never calls paid models (even under FUSION_LIVE=1 — that flag only marks the mode for the commands). Panel prompts embedding untrusted content (a diff under review) run with FUSION_NO_WEB=1 so injected instructions have no exfiltration path. (references/safety.md, references/panel-prompt.md)
  9. Honest-degrade beyond the panel. The new helpers obey the same rule: codemap.sh discloses CODEMAP_STATE and falls back tree-sitter→ctags→grep; selection_lint.py gates discovered context on evidence (S007); --deep/--discover/--worktrees are opt-in. Use the best available, disclose what ran, fall back loudly. (references/codemap.md, references/context-discovery.md, references/worktrees.md)

Skill root & paths

When a command or reference says scripts/… or references/…, that path is relative to this skill's root directory (the folder containing this SKILL.md) — resolve it against that directory, e.g. bash <skill-root>/scripts/detect_panel.sh, not against your current working directory. The installed location is ~/.claude/skills/fusion-deck/ (or wherever CLAUDE_SKILLS_DIR points); the generated /fusion-* command wrappers pass you this absolute path.

Quick start

# from the skill root (resolve these against <skill-root> if your shell is elsewhere):
bash scripts/detect_panel.sh        # what panel can this machine run right now?
bash scripts/smoke_test.sh          # offline self-check (no paid calls)

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.