Kr sector audit
Audit an existing Korea sector memo or report for source quality, date consistency, missing sections, number conflicts, overreach, and unsupported claims. Use when the user wants a review of a Korean sector document rather than a rewrite. Output should be findings-first.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add ray5273/kr-research-kit --skill kr-sector-auditAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
1.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Korean Sector Audit
Use this skill to review an existing Korea sector document.
Quick Start
- Start from the actual memo or report.
- Focus on factual support, internal consistency, date discipline, and unsupported inference.
- Lead with findings, ordered by severity.
- Do not silently rewrite the document. Explain what is wrong and why.
Workflow
- Read the document. Identify the intended scope, the claimed numbers, and the source style.
- Check support. Look for missing citations, stale dates, mixed-date metrics, and unsupported claims.
- Check structure. Look for missing critical sections, especially sector definition, risks, listed exposure mapping, and source disclosure.
- Write findings-first. Prioritize bugs in reasoning and factual integrity over style comments.
Read references/workflow.md for the audit checklist. Read references/output-format.md for the review format.
Operating Rules
- Findings come first.
- Acknowledge when no material issues are found.
- Residual risks and testing gaps still belong in the audit even when findings are light.