Vulnerability scanner
Awesome Claude Skills, Tools for Customizing Claude AI workflows
npx -y skills add ranbot-ai/awesome-skills --skill vulnerability-scannerAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 6 stars6 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Advanced vulnerability analysis principles. OWASP 2025, Supply Chain Security, attack surface mapping, risk prioritization.
SKILL.md
5.5 KB, ~1.3k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Vulnerability Scanner
Think like an attacker, defend like an expert. 2025 threat landscape awareness.
π§ Runtime Scripts
Execute for automated validation:
| Script | Purpose | Usage |
|---|---|---|
scripts/security_scan.py | Validate security principles applied | python scripts/security_scan.py <project_path> |
π Reference Files
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
| checklists.md | OWASP Top 10, Auth, API, Data protection checklists |
1. Security Expert Mindset
Core Principles
| Principle | Application |
|---|---|
| Assume Breach | Design as if attacker already inside |
| Zero Trust | Never trust, always verify |
| Defense in Depth | Multiple layers, no single point |
| Least Privilege | Minimum required access only |
| Fail Secure | On error, deny access |
Threat Modeling Questions
Before scanning, ask:
- What are we protecting? (Assets)
- Who would attack? (Threat actors)
- How would they attack? (Attack vectors)
- What's the impact? (Business risk)
2. OWASP Top 10:2025
Risk Categories
| Rank | Category | Think About |
|---|---|---|
| A01 | Broken Access Control | Who can access what? IDOR, SSRF |
| A02 | Security Misconfiguration | Defaults, headers, exposed services |
| A03 | Software Supply Chain π | Dependencies, CI/CD, build integrity |
| A04 | Cryptographic Failures | Weak crypto, exposed secrets |
| A05 | Injection | User input β system commands |
| A06 | Insecure Design | Flawed architecture |
| A07 | Authentication Failures | Session, credential management |
| A08 | Integrity Failures | Unsigned updates, tampered data |
| A09 | Logging & Alerting | Blind spots, no monitoring |
| A10 | Exceptional Conditions π | Error handling, fail-open states |
2025 Key Changes
2021 β 2025 Shifts:
βββ SSRF merged into A01 (Access Control)
βββ A02 elevated (Cloud/Container configs)
βββ A03 NEW: Supply Chain (major focus)
βββ A10 NEW: Exceptional Conditions
βββ Focus shift: Root causes > Symptoms
3. Supply Chain Security (A03)
Attack Surface
| Vector | Risk | Question to Ask |
|---|---|---|
| Dependencies | Malicious packages | Do we audit new deps? |
| Lock files | Integrity attacks | Are they committed? |
| Build pipeline | CI/CD compromise | Who can modify? |
| Registry | Typosquatting | Verified sources? |
Defense Principles
- Verify package integrity (checksums)
- Pin versions, audit updates
- Use private registries for critical deps
- Sign and verify artifacts
4. Attack Surface Mapping
What to Map
| Category | Elements |
|---|---|
| Entry Points | APIs, forms, file uploads |
| Data Flows | Input β Process β Output |
| Trust Boundaries | Where auth/authz checked |
| Assets | Secrets, PII, business data |
Prioritization Matrix
Risk = Likelihood Γ Impact
High Impact + High Likelihood β CRITICAL
High Impact + Low Likelihood β HIGH
Low Impact + High Likelihood β MEDIUM
Low Impact + Low Likelihood β LOW
5. Risk Prioritization
CVSS + Context
| Factor | Weight | Question |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS Score | Base severity | How severe is the vuln? |
| EPSS Score | Exploit likelihood | Is it being exploited? |
| Asset Value | Business context | What's at risk? |
| Exposure | Attack surface | Internet-facing? |
Prioritization Decision Tree
Is it actively exploited (EPSS >0.5)?
βββ YES β CRITICAL: Immediate action
βββ NO β Check CVSS
βββ CVSS β₯9.0 β HIGH
βββ CVSS 7.0-8.9 β Consider asset value
βββ CVSS <7.0 β Schedule for later
6. Exceptional Conditions (A10 - New)
Fail-Open vs Fail-Closed
| Scenario | Fail-Open (BAD) | Fail-Closed (GOOD) |
|---|---|---|
| Auth error | Allow access | Deny access |
| Parsing fails | Accept input | Reject input |
| Timeout | Retry forever | Limit + abort |
What to Check
- Exception handlers that catch-all and ignore
- Missing error handling on security operations
- Race conditions in auth/authz
- Resource exhaustion scenarios
7. Scanning Methodology
Phase-Based Approach
1. RECONNAISSANCE
βββ Understand the target
βββ Technology stack
βββ Entry points
βββ Data flows
2. DISCOVERY
βββ Identify potential issues
βββ Configuration review
βββ Dependency analysis
βββ Code pattern search
3. ANALYSIS
βββ Validate and prioritize
βββ False positive elimination
βββ Risk scoring
βββ Attack chain mapping
4. REPORTING
βββ Actionable findings
βββ Clear reproduction steps
βββ Business impact
βββ Remediation guidance
8. Code Pattern Analysis
High-Risk Patterns
| Pattern | Risk | Look For | |---------
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.