Django perf review
Awesome Claude Skills, Tools for Customizing Claude AI workflows
npx -y skills add ranbot-ai/awesome-skills --skill django-perf-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 6 stars6 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Django performance code review. Use when asked to "review Django performance", "find N+1 queries", "optimize Django", "check queryset performance", "database performance", "Django ORM issues", or audi
SKILL.md
5.3 KB, ~1.2k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Django Performance Review
Review Django code for validated performance issues. Research the codebase to confirm issues before reporting. Report only what you can prove.
When to Use
- You need a Django performance review focused on verified ORM and query issues.
- The code likely has N+1 queries, unbounded querysets, missing indexes, or other database-driven bottlenecks.
- You want only provable performance findings, not speculative optimization advice.
Review Approach
- Research first - Trace data flow, check for existing optimizations, verify data volume
- Validate before reporting - Pattern matching is not validation
- Zero findings is acceptable - Don't manufacture issues to appear thorough
- Severity must match impact - If you catch yourself writing "minor" in a CRITICAL finding, it's not critical. Downgrade or skip it.
Impact Categories
Issues are organized by impact. Focus on CRITICAL and HIGH - these cause real problems at scale.
| Priority | Category | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | N+1 Queries | CRITICAL - Multiplies with data, causes timeouts |
| 2 | Unbounded Querysets | CRITICAL - Memory exhaustion, OOM kills |
| 3 | Missing Indexes | HIGH - Full table scans on large tables |
| 4 | Write Loops | HIGH - Lock contention, slow requests |
| 5 | Inefficient Patterns | LOW - Rarely worth reporting |
Priority 1: N+1 Queries (CRITICAL)
Impact: Each N+1 adds O(n) database round trips. 100 rows = 100 extra queries. 10,000 rows = timeout.
Rule: Prefetch related data accessed in loops
Validate by tracing: View → Queryset → Template/Serializer → Loop access
# PROBLEM: N+1 - each iteration queries profile
def user_list(request):
users = User.objects.all()
return render(request, 'users.html', {'users': users})
# Template:
# {% for user in users %}
# {{ user.profile.bio }} ← triggers query per user
# {% endfor %}
# SOLUTION: Prefetch in view
def user_list(request):
users = User.objects.select_related('profile')
return render(request, 'users.html', {'users': users})
Rule: Prefetch in serializers, not just views
DRF serializers accessing related fields cause N+1 if queryset isn't optimized.
# PROBLEM: SerializerMethodField queries per object
class UserSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
order_count = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
def get_order_count(self, obj):
return obj.orders.count() # ← query per user
# SOLUTION: Annotate in viewset, access in serializer
class UserViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
def get_queryset(self):
return User.objects.annotate(order_count=Count('orders'))
class UserSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
order_count = serializers.IntegerField(read_only=True)
Rule: Model properties that query are dangerous in loops
# PROBLEM: Property triggers query when accessed
class User(models.Model):
@property
def recent_orders(self):
return self.orders.filter(created__gte=last_week)[:5]
# Used in template loop = N+1
# SOLUTION: Use Prefetch with custom queryset, or annotate
Validation Checklist for N+1
- Traced data flow from view to template/serializer
- Confirmed related field is accessed inside a loop
- Searched codebase for existing select_related/prefetch_related
- Verified table has significant row count (1000+)
- Confirmed this is a hot path (not admin, not rare action)
Priority 2: Unbounded Querysets (CRITICAL)
Impact: Loading entire tables exhausts memory. Large tables cause OOM kills and worker restarts.
Rule: Always paginate list endpoints
# PROBLEM: No pagination - loads all rows
class UserListView(ListView):
model = User
template_name = 'users.html'
# SOLUTION: Add pagination
class UserListView(ListView):
model = User
template_name = 'users.html'
paginate_by = 25
Rule: Use iterator() for large batch processing
# PROBLEM: Loads all objects into memory at once
for user in User.objects.all():
process(user)
# SOLUTION: Stream with iterator()
for user in User.objects.iterator(chunk_size=1000):
process(user)
Rule: Never call list() on unbounded querysets
# PROBLEM: Forces full evaluation into memory
all_users = list(User.objects.all())
# SOLUTION: Keep as queryset, slice if needed
users = User.objects.all()[:100]
Validation Checklist for Unbounded Querysets
- Table is large (10k+ rows) or will grow unbounded
- No pagination class, paginate_by, or slicing
- This runs on user-facing request (not background job with chunking)
Priority 3: Missing Indexes (HIGH)
Impact: Full table scans. Negligible on small tables, catastrophic on large ones.
Rule: Index fields used in WHERE clauses on large tables
# PROBLEM: Filtering on unindexed field
# User.objects.filter(email=email) # full sc