Blueprint
Awesome Claude Skills, Tools for Customizing Claude AI workflows
npx -y skills add ranbot-ai/awesome-skills --skill blueprintAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 6 stars6 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan any coding agent can execute cold. Each step has a self-contained context brief — a fresh agent in a new session can pick up any step
SKILL.md
4.1 KB, 820 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Blueprint — Construction Plan Generator
Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step plan any coding agent can execute cold.
Overview
Blueprint is for multi-session, multi-agent engineering projects where each step must be independently executable by a fresh agent that has never seen the conversation history. Install it once, invoke it with /blueprint <project> <objective>.
When to Use This Skill
- Use when the task requires multiple PRs or sessions
- Use when multiple agents or team members need to share execution
- Use when you want adversarial review of the plan before execution
- Use when parallel step detection and dependency graphs matter
How It Works
- Research — Scans the codebase, reads project memory, runs pre-flight checks
- Design — Breaks the objective into one-PR-sized steps, identifies parallelism, assigns model tiers
- Draft — Generates the plan from a structured template with branch workflow rules, CI policy, and rollback strategies inline
- Review — Delegates adversarial review to a strongest-model sub-agent (falls back to default model if unavailable)
- Register — Saves the plan and updates project memory
Examples
Example 1: Database migration
/blueprint myapp "migrate database to PostgreSQL"
Example 2: Plugin extraction
/blueprint antbot "extract providers into plugins"
Best Practices
- ✅ Use for tasks requiring 3+ PRs or multiple sessions
- ✅ Let Blueprint auto-detect git/gh availability — it degrades gracefully
- ❌ Don't invoke for tasks completable in a single PR
- ❌ Don't invoke when the user says "just do it"
Key Differentiators
- Cold-start execution: Every step has a self-contained context brief
- Adversarial review gate: Strongest-model review before execution
- Markdown-first distribution: The reviewed revision is primarily instructions and templates, but installing or following it can still cause an agent to run commands. Treat the repository as untrusted until inspected.
- Plan mutation protocol: Steps can be split, inserted, skipped with audit trail
Installation
Do not clone a moving branch directly into an active skills directory. First ask the user to approve network access to the named repository. Then inspect the reviewed revision and ask separately before activating it:
review_dir="$(mktemp -d)"
git clone --filter=blob:none https://github.com/antbotlab/blueprint.git "$review_dir/blueprint"
git -C "$review_dir/blueprint" checkout --detach 07c5b305cf2d95d584a0d0398c390e839fec5954
git -C "$review_dir/blueprint" ls-files
git -C "$review_dir/blueprint" status --short
Read SKILL.md and every bundled file at that exact commit. Check for scripts,
hooks, symlinks, network calls, credential access, and instructions that request
commands or elevated permissions. Only after explicit user approval, copy the
reviewed files into the selected host's skills directory. Re-review a newer
revision instead of silently updating this pin.
Additional Resources
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
- A pinned revision is reproducible, not automatically trustworthy; its contents still require review.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most plan spec skills give in 820 tokens
Counted across 1,099 of the 1,860 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07
- Ask one question at a timein 51 of 1099
- Break plans into vertical slicesin 29 of 1099, across 11 files
- Publish issues in dependency orderin 27 of 1099, across 9 files
- Iterate until user approves the breakdownin 25 of 1099, across 7 files
- Explore the repository to understand the codebase statein 24 of 1099, across 7 files
- Use domain glossary vocabularyin 23 of 1099, across 5 files
- Apply correct triage labels to published issuesin 23 of 1099, across 5 files
- Prefer AFK slices over HITLin 22 of 1099, across 7 files
- Write a specification before writing any codein 22 of 1099, across 14 files
- Write failing tests before implementation codein 22 of 1099, across 20 files
- Ask clarifying questions until requirements are concretein 21 of 1099, across 13 files
- Respect existing architecture decision recordsin 20 of 1099, across 5 files
Said here and by no other author read
- scan the codebase during research
- identify parallelism and dependency graphs
- ask the user to approve network access to the repository
- inspect the reviewed revision before activating it
- check reviewed files for scripts and network calls
- re-review newer revisions instead of silently updating
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.