Memory sync

Spec 002 (memory layer) is fully closed — all four slices DONE: 002-01 (explicit-sync), 002-02 (lookup-pattern), 002-03 (auto-detect-hooks), 002-04 (reconciliation-integration). 002-04's reconciliation integration is now the Memory-sync gate in the spec-workflow reconciliation checklist.

What this skill does

Persists session-derived context to the memory layer via a deterministic helper. Claude makes the what / where decisions; memory.py does the file I/O, idempotency, and self-healing of missing memory structure.

When to invoke

• User says "remember this", "save this for later", "add this to the glossary", "note this down", or similar (→ persist flow below).
• User explicitly invokes /jig:memory-sync.
• An unknown capitalized reference appears in the conversation (→ lookup-pattern flow below).
• Session-end consolidation (after slice 002-03 auto-trigger ships).
• The session settled a non-spec shipped decision — a UI string, visual/CSS choice, translation correction, or scoped brand/icon call made outside a spec slice (→ lightweight-decision flow below). This is the forcing function for out-of-spec work, which has no reconciliation phase to catch it.

Lookup-pattern flow

When you see a capitalized reference, acronym, or project-specific term you don't recognize, follow this flow before asking the user:

seen unknown reference X
  ↓
python3 memory.py lookup "X" .
  ↓ exit 0 → use the printed definition; do not ask
  ↓ exit 2 → ask the user once: "I don't recognize X — what is it?"
  ↓ user answers
  ↓
python3 memory.py add-term "X" "<definition>" .   (or promote if high-frequency)
  ↓ next time X appears, lookup hits

Concretely, the commands are:

python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/memory.py" lookup "<term>" "<target>"
# exit 0 = hit (definition + source on stdout)
# exit 2 = miss (proceed to ask the user)

The lookup is case-insensitive and checks hot cache first, then glossary. Hot cache hits win when a term exists in both (the user has explicitly elevated it).

Do not ask twice. Once a term is persisted (via add-term or promote), future lookups in the same or later sessions resolve without re-asking. If the user says "I told you this already," check whether you forgot to persist last time, then persist now.

How to use

1. Identify candidate items from the recent session:

   • New domain terms — anything the user defined or that needed explaining.
   • Learnings — failed approaches, dead ends, "we tried X" gotchas.
   • Parked ideas — things mentioned but not yet decided on.
   • Frequently-referenced terms — anything used ≥3 times this session.
   • Non-spec shipped decisions (spec 083) — UI strings, visual/CSS choices, translation corrections, scoped brand/icon calls settled outside a spec slice. Conditional, to avoid noise: only surface this when the session actually touched such product/UI/out-of-spec work — skip it entirely for pure backend/refactor/spec sessions.
   • Load-bearing decision escape hatch (spec 083-06 / ADR-0031) — the enumerated surface list above is not a closed gate. This session-end prompt is the only judgment owner for out-of-spec load-bearing decisions (which have no reconciliation phase), so also surface — regardless of which surface was touched — any decision the canonical ADR trigger covers. Canonical wording — single-sourced from ADR-0031, drift-tested verbatim across all four surfaces: A load-bearing design choice with rejected alternatives — one a future agent would need to know about to avoid undoing it — warrants an ADR even when it changes no module boundary or public contract.

2. Decide per item which file it belongs in:

   • Niche/domain term → glossary
   • Failed approach / gotcha → learnings
   • Unresolved/unfinished thought → inbox
   • High-frequency term → hot cache (in CLAUDE.md)
   • Non-spec shipped decision → docs/decisions/lightweight-decisions.md

3. Invoke memory.py once per item with the right command. Always quote the term/definition/body arguments — terms may contain spaces, definitions often contain punctuation:

   python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/memory.py" add-term "<name>" "<definition>" "<target>"
   python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/memory.py" add-learning "<title>" --body "<text>" "<target>"
   python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/memory.py" add-inbox "<text>" "<target>"
   python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/memory.py" add-refinement-todo "<raw-markdown-chunk>" "<target>"
   python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/memory.py" promote "<term>" "<definition>" "<target>"
   

   add-refinement-todo appends raw text (caller composes the markdown chunk — H2 category, deferred-/resolution-trigger structure, etc.) to docs/refinement-todo.md under the parallel-session file lock (slice 028-02). Where <target> is the project root (usually .).

   Non-spec shipped decisions use decisions.py, not memory.py (spec 083-05): the file lives in docs/decisions/, not docs/memory/. Record one with the idempotent helper (it appends in the file's ### [Date] — [Title] / Decision / Context / Scope / Commit template; re-running with the same title is a no-op):

   python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/decisions.py" add-lightweight \
     --title "<short title>" --decision "<what>" --context "<why>" \
     --scope "<which screen / component / string / asset>" [--commit "<SHA/PR>"]
   

   The helper seeds lightweight-decisions.md from jig's template when the project has none (bug 012) and says so — a project that adopted jig before the feature landed never received the file. Never hand-write the file yourself: if the helper refuses because an existing file is not in jig's format, it names both remedies — follow one, don't invent a third.

   Confirm with the user before writing — it's their decision to record, not yours to infer. If the decision clears the ADR trigger above, route it to an ADR (adr.py new) instead of here.

   Revising an already-recorded entry — re-ask the routing question first (spec 100-01 / ADR-0042). A decision's weight can change after it was filed: #121 reports one recorded as bounded, later re-priced by review into a module-boundary change with rejected alternatives, edited in place, and never re-routed. Routing is asked once at first write and never again — so you ask it again here. Before revising, judge the entry as it will read after the change against the canonical ADR trigger quoted above:

   • Clears the trigger → promote it; do not revise it in place:

     python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/decisions.py" promote \
       --title "<existing title>" --no-push [--slug "<adr-slug>"]
     

     This creates the ADR via adr.py new, seeds it from the entry's own fields, and leaves a forward-linking stub so old references still land on a record.

     --no-push is shown because you are almost always on a feature branch. Push mode reserves the ADR number on origin/main from an ephemeral worktree, so the file never lands in your working copy and there is nothing to seed — promote refuses up-front rather than stranding a reserved ADR on the trunk. Drop --no-push (or use --pr) only when promoting from main itself; the local ADR lands with the rest of your branch's work.

   • Still settled, local, and bounded (one screen / component / string / asset, no real rejected alternatives) → revise it in place. Omitted fields keep their recorded values:

     python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/decisions.py" update \
       --title "<existing title>" [--decision "<what>"] [--context "<why>"] \
       [--scope "<where>"] [--commit "<SHA/PR>"]
     

   Judge meaning, not vocabulary. A UI-copy or translation decision saying "X instead of Y" is naming a wording preference, not a rejected architectural alternative — it belongs here. The trigger is about a load-bearing choice a future agent could undo by accident. As with recording, confirm a promotion with the user before running it.

   To sweep records written before this guidance existed, decisions.py lint reports entries whose text reads as ADR-worthy. It is advisory — it matches wording, not meaning, so treat a finding as a prompt to judge, never as a verdict.

4. Report a summary at the end:

   python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/memory.py" summary <target>
   

5. Re-check the team signal as the final step (spec 050-01). This re-runs scaffold-init's exact team detection (≥2 distinct mailmap git authors, monorepo-guarded). When the project has grown past solo and docs/memory/people.md is absent (and no .jig/no-people-md opt-out marker is present), the helper surfaces a structured nudge:

   python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/memory.py" team-check <target>
   

   The advisory offers three options — [y] bootstrap people.md now, [n] skip this run, [never] suppress future nudges. In an interactive terminal the helper prompts and acts. In agent (non-TTY) context it prints the advisory and exits 0 without blocking — you must surface the advisory to the user, ask which option they want, and relay their choice by re-running with the matching flag:

   # user chose [y] — create docs/memory/people.md from the template:
   python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/memory.py" team-check --bootstrap <target>
   # user chose [never] — write the opt-out marker, never ask again:
   python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/memory-sync/memory.py" team-check --never <target>
   # user chose [n] — do nothing this run (they'll be asked next memory-sync).
   

   team-check is a no-op when people.md already exists, when .jig/no-people-md is present, or when the project is still solo — so it is safe to run unconditionally at the end of every memory-sync.

Judgment guidance

• Don't over-persist. Persisting trivia bloats memory files. If you wouldn't want to read it back in a future session, don't write it.
• "≥3 references" is your judgment. The helper does not track session counts — you decide when a term has been used enough to deserve hot-cache promotion.
• Inbox > glossary when in doubt. An inbox entry can be promoted later; a premature glossary entry pollutes the searchable terminology.
• The reviewer subagent cannot run this skill. Reviewers read from memory but must not write — defining the glossary is not the reviewer's job (see agents/reviewer.md).

Self-healing

If docs/memory/ or docs/inbox.md don't exist (pre-scaffold-init project), the helper creates them. If CLAUDE.md is absent, promote falls back to add-term (writes to glossary) and warns on stderr. The skill works on unscaffolded projects, though scaffold-init is the recommended setup.

Gotchas

• add-term and add-learning are idempotent on the exact heading text. Re-running with the same term/title is a no-op. To genuinely update an existing entry, edit the file by hand or use Edit.
• add-inbox is NOT idempotent — it always appends. The inbox is a stream; near- duplicates are tolerated and triaged later.
• promote is idempotent on a line-anchored - **<term>** match. If a term is in the Key terms list with a slightly different label or hyphenation, it counts as new.
• promote inserts new bullets immediately after the ### Key terms heading (LIFO — newest first). This is intentional: the most recently promoted term is the most likely to be referenced in the next session. If alphabetical or chronological order is preferred later, this is a design point worth revisiting.
• Definitions are stored as-is; markdown is allowed but be conservative — these files are scanned by humans more often than parsed.