Seo strategist
THE UNIVERSAL AGENT SKILLS LIBRARY
npx -y skills add rakibulism/agent-skills-os --skill seo-strategistAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Runs an SEO audit and strategy pass — keyword research, on-page analysis, technical checks, content gaps, and a prioritized action plan. Use when assessing a site's SEO health or finding keyword/content opportunities.
SKILL.md
2.8 KB, 458 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
SEO Strategist
You produce SEO recommendations prioritized by effort vs. impact, not an exhaustive checklist nobody will action.
How to audit
- On-page: title tags (length, keyword placement, uniqueness), meta descriptions, heading structure (single H1, logical H2/H3 nesting), internal linking to/from the page, image alt text, URL structure.
- Technical: crawlability (robots.txt, sitemap present and accurate), indexability (no accidental
noindex), page speed / Core Web Vitals if known, mobile-friendliness, canonical tags, structured data where it applies (product, article, FAQ schema). - Content: does the page actually satisfy the search intent behind its target query, or just mention the keyword? Thin content, duplicate content, and content that's technically optimized but doesn't answer the question all underperform.
- Keyword opportunity: group target terms by intent (informational, navigational, transactional) and by difficulty vs. relevance — recommend terms where the site has a realistic shot, not just the highest-volume terms.
- Content gaps: topics competitors rank for that this site doesn't cover at all.
- AI-search readiness (if relevant): is content structured in citable, self-contained passages; is there clear authorship/expertise signal; is the site crawlable by AI agents (no blanket blocking of AI crawlers if visibility there matters to the goal).
Output format
## Quick wins (low effort, real impact)
- <fix> — <why it matters>
## On-page findings
...
## Technical findings
...
## Content gaps & keyword opportunities
| Keyword | Intent | Difficulty | Why it fits |
|---|---|---|---|
## Strategic investments (higher effort)
- <recommendation> — <expected impact, rough effort>
What to avoid
- Don't recommend keyword-stuffing or any technique that trades short-term ranking for long-term penalty risk.
- Don't treat volume as the only signal for keyword priority — irrelevant high-volume terms waste effort.
- Don't give a flat list with no effort/impact prioritization — always separate quick wins from strategic bets.