System profile
An automated AI research-code writer and AI research-paper writer implementation through a skills+ autoraters using any coding agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Antigravity, Cline, Aider). No API keys, no LLM SDKs.
npx -y skills add raja21068/AutoResearch --skill system-profileAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Profile a target (script, process, GPU, memory, interconnect) using external tools and code instrumentation. Produces structured performance reports with actionable recommendations. Use when user says "profile", "benchmark", "bottleneck", or wants performance analysis.
SKILL.md
4.5 KB, 949 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
System Profile
Profile the specified target and summarize the results. Target: $ARGUMENTS
Instructions
You are a profiling assistant. Based on the user's target, choose appropriate profiling strategies, including writing instrumentation code when needed, then run profiling, analyze results, and produce a summary.
Step 1: Determine the profiling target
Parse $ARGUMENTS to understand what to profile. Examples:
- A Python script or module
- A running process (PID or service name)
- A specific function or code block
- An entire framework or system (e.g., "autogen", "vllm serving") — profile its end-to-end execution, identify bottlenecks across components
- "gpu" / "interconnect" / "memory" for focused profiling
If $ARGUMENTS is empty or unclear, ask the user.
Step 2: Choose profiling methods
Select from external tools and/or code instrumentation as appropriate. Don't limit yourself to the examples below — use whatever makes sense for the target.
External tools (check availability first):
- CPU:
cProfile,py-spy,line_profiler,perf stat,/usr/bin/time -v - Memory:
tracemalloc,memory_profiler,memray - GPU:
nvidia-smi,nvidia-smi dmon,nvitop,torch.profiler,nsys - Interconnect:
nvidia-smi topo -m,nvidia-smi nvlink,NCCL_DEBUG=INFO - System:
strace -c,iostat,vmstat
Code instrumentation — when external tools are insufficient, write and insert profiling code into the target. Typical scenarios:
- Timing specific code blocks (wall time vs CPU time)
- Measuring CPU-GPU or GPU-GPU transfer size, frequency, and bandwidth
- Tracking memory allocation across CPU and GPU to detect redundancy
- Wrapping NCCL collectives to measure latency and throughput
- Adding CUDA event timing around kernels
Design the instrumentation based on what you observe in the code — don't use a fixed template.
Step 3: Key dimensions to investigate
Depending on the target, focus on some or all of these:
CPU overhead
- Context switching (voluntary / involuntary)
- CPU utilization: ratio of CPU time to wall time
- Per-function execution time hotspots
Memory overhead
- CPU and GPU memory usage (allocated vs reserved vs peak)
- Redundant replication: same data living on both CPU and GPU
- Per-device allocation balance in multi-GPU setups
Interconnect & communication
- CPU-GPU transfer: frequency, per-transfer size, total volume, bandwidth achieved
- GPU-GPU transfer: P2P bandwidth, NVLink vs PCIe topology impact
- NCCL collectives: operation type, message size distribution, latency
- Communication-to-computation ratio
GPU compute
- SM utilization, kernel launch overhead
- Memory bandwidth utilization vs peak
Step 4: Instrumentation guidelines
When inserting code into the target:
- Read and understand the target code first
- Prefer wrapping (decorator, context manager, standalone runner) over inline edits
- If inline edits are necessary, mark them clearly (e.g.,
# [PROFILE]comments) - Minimize observer effect — don't instrument tight inner loops; sample instead
- Collect results into a structured log, don't scatter print statements
Step 5: Run profiling
- Check available tools and hardware topology
- Run the chosen methods, capture all output
- Save artifacts (flamegraphs, traces, logs) to
./profile_output/
Step 6: Produce the report
Part A — Profiling results (structured tables by dimension, as applicable):
- CPU overhead table
- Memory overhead table (with redundancy column)
- Interconnect table (transfer type / frequency / size / latency / bandwidth)
- Hotspots / bottleneck identification
- Actionable recommendations ranked by expected impact
Part B — Instrumentation changelog (MANDATORY): List every file that was modified or created for profiling purposes:
| File | Change type | What was added/modified | Line(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ... | modified | ... | ... |
| ... | created | ... | — |
This allows the user to review and revert all instrumentation changes. Offer to clean up (remove all instrumentation) when the user is done.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most performance cost skills give in 949 tokens
Counted across 803 of the 1,058 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07
- Keep skill files under 500 lines or tokensin 82 of 803, across 16 files
- Use imperative form in instructionsin 80 of 803, across 9 files
- Draft assertions while test runs are in progressin 75 of 803, across 9 files
- Create two to three realistic test promptsin 74 of 803, across 9 files
- Write skill descriptions to be pushyin 72 of 803, across 7 files
- Save test cases to evals JSONin 72 of 803, across 6 files
- Ask questions about edge cases and input formatsin 72 of 803, across 7 files
- Save timing data immediately when runs completein 70 of 803, across 5 files
- Include all trigger conditions in the skill descriptionin 69 of 803, across 3 files
- Launch all test runs in a single turn or simultaneouslyin 69 of 803, across 3 files
- Capture intent before writing a skillin 67 of 803, across 1 file
- Import directly instead of barrel filesin 52 of 803, across 15 files
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.