Salesforce flow automation review skill
Skill Raishin/vanguard-frontier-agentic/skills/salesforce/salesforce-flow-automation-review-skill
Use this skill when Salesforce Flow XML, validation rules, approval processes, or record-triggered automation must be reviewed for correctness, safety, and maintainability. Flags recursion, ungoverned bypass flags, brittle null handling, missing fault paths, hardcoded recipients, before-save vs after-save misuse, and mixed Process Builder plus Flow plus Apex on same object. Trigger phrases: "review this Flow", "check this automation for recursion", "review this approval process", "is this validation rule safe", "review this record-triggered automation". Do not use when Apex code is the primary subject (use salesforce-apex-lwc-code-review-skill), when metadata quality (not logic) is the focus (use salesforce-metadata-review-skill), or when a live automation activation is proposed (use salesforce-live-change-approval-protocol). Works from pasted or exported automation definitions only; never requests live org access.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add Raishin/vanguard-frontier-agentic --skill salesforce-flow-automation-review-skillAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 20 stars20 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
8.3 KB, ~1.5k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Salesforce Flow Automation Review Skill
Purpose
This skill reviews Salesforce Flow XML, validation rules, approval processes, and record-triggered automation for correctness, safety, and maintainability. It flags patterns that cause data corruption, runaway governor-limit consumption, incorrect execution order, and logic errors. It does not access live orgs and does not authorize automation activation.
When to use
- A Flow is being reviewed before activation in production.
- A record-triggered automation has caused unexpected behavior and must be analyzed.
- An automation inventory contains mixed automation types on the same object.
- An approval process or validation rule needs pre-release safety review.
When not to use
- Apex code is the primary subject — use
salesforce-apex-lwc-code-review-skill. - Metadata quality (field definitions, layouts) — use
salesforce-metadata-review-skill. - Live automation activation proposal — use
salesforce-live-change-approval-protocol. - Full org automation inventory — use
salesforce-org-assessment-skill.
Minimum payload (required inputs)
- Flow XML (or equivalent exported Flow definition) or automation description.
- Automation type: record-triggered, screen, scheduled, autolaunched, or subflow.
- Object(s) the automation acts on.
- Whether other automation types (Apex triggers, Process Builder , validation rules) are active on the same object.
Workflow
1. Recursion detection
- Identify flows that update the same object that triggered them.
- Check for recursion prevention mechanisms:
$Flow.CurrentStage, custom boolean field as recursion guard, or explicit entry condition excluding re-triggered records. - Flag flows that could recursively fire without a guard.
2. Bypass flags
- Flag flows that check custom bypass permissions or hierarchy settings to skip
execution (e.g.,
Bypass_All_Flows__ccustom field or permission set bypass). - Determine whether bypass is documented, scoped, and auditable.
- Flag ungoverned bypass: bypass that has no associated approval process or documentation.
3. Null handling
- Review Decision elements for null-check branches.
- Flag formulas or conditions that will throw errors on null values.
- Flag flows that access lookup fields without a null guard on the lookup itself.
- Flag
Get Recordselements whose output is used without a null check after the element.
4. Fault paths
- Verify that every element that can fail (DML, invocable actions, callouts, platform events) has a connected Fault path.
- Flag flows where a Fault path is missing entirely.
- Flag Fault paths that silently swallow errors (no logging, no notification).
5. Before-save vs after-save misuse
- Record-triggered flows operating before-save: flag if they make DML operations (not allowed in before-save context).
- Record-triggered flows operating after-save: flag if they could be moved to before-save for efficiency (field updates only, no related-record operations).
- Flag after-save flows that cause cascading DML triggering Apex triggers.
6. Hardcoded recipients and IDs
- Flag hardcoded email addresses in Send Email elements.
- Flag hardcoded user IDs or group IDs in assignment or notification elements.
- Recommend: Custom Metadata, Custom Labels, or hierarchy settings instead.
7. Mixed automation on same object
- Identify if Process Builder (deprecated), Apex triggers, and Flows are all active on the same object.
- Flag execution order risks: trigger order between Apex and Flows is not always deterministic; flag if both Fire at the same DML moment.
- Recommend: migration plan to consolidate to a single automation layer.
8. Approval process review
- Flag approval processes without email templates (hardcoded notification text).
- Flag approval processes where the final approver is a specific user ID.
- Flag approval processes with no rejection branch behavior defined.
- Flag approval processes on objects also governed by Flow with duplicate logic.
9. Validation rule review
- Flag validation rules with no descriptive error message.
- Flag validation rules that reference fields not on the current object without a VLOOKUP — this can cause silent failures.
- Flag validation rules that fire on all events when they should be conditioned on specific record types or entry points.
Evidence requirements
- Exported Flow XML or detailed automation description; no credentials, no session tokens.
- Object name(s) and list of other active automation on the same object.
- If the automation accesses external systems (callouts), note the endpoint category.
Output format
flow_automation_findings:
recursion_risks:
- finding: [description]
severity: Critical | High | Medium | Low
evidence: [element name or condition]
recommendation: [brief]
bypass_flag_risks: [same structure]
null_handling_risks: [same structure]
fault_path_gaps: [same structure]
before_after_save_issues: [same structure]
hardcoded_values: [same structure]
mixed_automation_risks: [same structure]
approval_process_findings: [same structure]
validation_rule_findings: [same structure]
summary:
total_findings: [count]
critical_count: [count]
high_count: [count]
escalation_gates_fired: [from salesforce-risk-taxonomy, or "none"]
assumptions: [list]
missing_evidence: [what would improve the review]
Redaction rules
- Never request secrets, credentials, OAuth tokens, refresh tokens, session IDs, MFA seeds, customer PII.
- Sanitize org IDs, user IDs (replace with placeholders) before sharing in outputs.
- Do not repeat hardcoded email addresses or user IDs from Flow XML in output; describe pattern and location.
Privilege / data handling rules
- Automation review is logic-level only; do not carry record data from Flow outputs.
- Findings involving data exposure patterns escalate to salesforce-permission-model-review-skill.
Handoff rules
- Hands off to: salesforce-apex-lwc-code-review-skill (if Apex triggers are involved), salesforce-permission-model-review-skill (if permission bypass is found), salesforce-org-assessment-skill (if mixed automation is systemic).
- If escalation gate fires: salesforce-case-capsule with escalation_required = true.
- Required handoff fields: matter_id, automation_type, object_name, escalation_gates_fired, critical_count.
Audit log fields
- matter_id, skill_id, skill_version, invoked_by, input_hash, evidence_quality, output_verdict, escalation_fired, timestamp
Stop conditions
- Flow XML contains live credentials, callout secrets, or PII — stop and ask for sanitized version.
- Recursion without guard detected in a production-active flow — output Critical finding and recommend immediate deactivation review with human authorization.
- Ungoverned bypass flag grants admin-level access to non-admin users — escalate to salesforce-permission-model-review-skill.
Security notes
- Read-only static review of exported automation definitions; never requests live org access.
- Hardcoded recipient values must not be repeated in output.
- Automation activation or deactivation decisions require human-authorized change management.
- Process Builder deprecation status should be verified against current Salesforce release notes.
What ships with it: 4 files
22.0 KB alongside SKILL.md
references/
- automation-conflict-matrix.md7.2 KB
- fault-path-design.md6.5 KB
- flow-anti-patterns.md7.3 KB
- metadata.json1.1 KB