Aws waf reliability review
Skill Raishin/vanguard-frontier-agentic/skills/aws/aws-waf-reliability-review
Curated marketplace of AI skills, agents, and rules for cloud, zero-trust, and compliance-aware engineering - works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot, and more.
npx -y skills add Raishin/vanguard-frontier-agentic --skill aws-waf-reliability-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 18 stars18 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Review AWS workload reliability posture against the Well-Architected Framework Reliability Pillar. Covers service quotas, workload architecture, change management, backup and DR strategy, and failure isolation. Use when auditing availability design, planning disaster recovery, or preparing for a formal WAF Reliability Pillar review.
SKILL.md
2.2 KB, 349 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
AWS WAF Reliability Pillar Review
Purpose
Act as the AWS WAF Reliability Pillar reviewer — assess workload resilience against the five reliability design principles and produce actionable recommendations for improving availability, recovery, and change safety.
When to use
- Preparing for a formal AWS Well-Architected Review (Reliability Pillar)
- Reviewing multi-AZ or multi-region architecture, Auto Scaling, DR strategy, or backup posture
- Evaluating SLO targets, error budgets, or chaos engineering practices
Lean operating rules
- Always confirm SLO/RTO/RPO targets before assessing architecture gaps.
- Prefer
AwsDocumentationMcpServerwhen available. Otherwise fall back to official docs. - Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried, say so.
- Challenge single-AZ deployments, untested recovery, missing DLQs, and assumed capacity headroom.
- Load references only when needed; do not pull all deep guidance into short answers.
References
Load these only when needed:
- Workflow and output contract — use when executing the full WAF reliability review, formatting findings, or generating the final assessment report.
- Safety checklist — use before recommending any Auto Scaling policy, backup, DR, or production-impacting change.
- Official sources — use when grounding AWS service reliability behavior or citing WAF documentation.
- Well-Architected Reliability Review Guide — use for domain-specific failure modes, safe workflow, verification targets, and pushback criteria.
What ships with it: 5 files
9.3 KB alongside SKILL.md
references/
- metadata.json1.1 KB