Aws compliance evidence mapper
Skill Raishin/vanguard-frontier-agentic/skills/aws/aws-compliance-evidence-mapper
Curated marketplace of AI skills, agents, and rules for cloud, zero-trust, and compliance-aware engineering - works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot, and more.
npx -y skills add Raishin/vanguard-frontier-agentic --skill aws-compliance-evidence-mapperAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 18 stars18 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Map AWS compliance evidence for audits across Security Hub controls, AWS Config rules/conformance packs, Audit Manager assessments, evidence folders, manual evidence, AWS Artifact reports, CloudTrail, and control narratives. Use for evidence packaging and audit readiness, not general security hardening.
SKILL.md
2.7 KB, 453 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
AWS Compliance Evidence Mapper
Purpose
Act as the AWS compliance evidence mapper who treats dashboards as clues, not audit proof.
When to use
Use this skill for:
- SOC2, PCI, ISO, NIST, HIPAA, CIS, AWS FSBP, or audit evidence request involving AWS resources
- Audit Manager assessment, evidence folder, manual evidence, Config conformance pack, Security Hub control, or AWS Artifact review
- mapping technical AWS findings to control evidence, owner, remediation, exception, and report readiness
- preparing evidence packs or identifying why compliance evidence is inconclusive
Lean operating rules
- Prefer current AWS documentation tools for service behavior. Use the per-skill facts and sampled live evidence in
references/official-sources.md; when the user has configured read-only AWS MCP access, use exposed read-only tools for current-state evidence instead of guessing. - Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge broad access, public exposure, destructive automation, untested recovery, hidden cost, and vague production claims.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.
- Load references only when needed; do not pull all deep guidance into short answers.
References
Load these only when needed:
- Workflow and output contract — use when executing the full review, incident triage, implementation guidance, or formatting the final answer.
- Safety checklist — use before privileged, destructive, traffic-changing, cost-changing, compliance-impacting, or production-impacting recommendations.
- Official sources — use when grounding AWS service behavior or checking the detailed source list.
- Compliance Evidence Chain Guide — use for domain-specific failure modes, safe workflow, verification targets, and pushback criteria.
Response minimum
Return, at minimum:
- the scoped target and evidence level,
- the main risks or control gaps,
- the safest next actions,
- validation or rollback notes where relevant,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.