agentsclimarketplace

Lean research

Skill r-irbe/proof-skills/skills/lean-research

USE FOR: per-question Lean 4 research — picking a research method (Mathlib grep / Web / repo grep / sub-agent), running the discovery ladder for Mathlib/Loogle/Reservoir/GitHub/literature lookups, choosing depth (Shallow / Standard / Deep / Exhaustive), emitting a findings + recommended-strategy + Zettel triple, integrating with the Rumsfeld epistemic matrix and the review council, running a typed protocol (M / T / L / S / D / X / E). DO NOT USE FOR: full council convocation (use @research-council); synthesis emission (use @research-synthesis-engine); package adoption or Lake dependency decisions (use @lean-package-research); proof writing (use @lean-proof); review (use @lean-review-council). TRIGGERS: research, mathlib lookup, find lemma, theorem search, Loogle, Moogle, Reservoir, package search, literature search, web search, what does X mean, typed research, M protocol, T protocol, L protocol.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add r-irbe/proof-skills --skill lean-research

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

6.5 KB, ~1.3k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Lean 4 Research Skill

Systematic methodology for investigating proof strategies, API availability, tactic behavior, and academic connections during Lean 4 formalization.


Routing

  • USE FOR / DO NOT USE FOR / TRIGGERS — see the description field in the YAML frontmatter above. Same dispatch contract is restated here for in-skill discovery.
  • USE FOR: per-question Lean 4 research — picking a research method (Mathlib grep / Web / repo grep / sub-agent), running the discovery ladder for Mathlib/Loogle/Reservoir/GitHub/literature lookups, choosing depth (Shallow / Standard / Deep / Exhaustive), emitting a findings + recommended-strategy + Zettel triple, integrating with the Rumsfeld epistemic matrix and the review council, running a typed protocol (M / T / L / S / D / X / E).
  • DO NOT USE FOR: full council convocation (use @research-council); synthesis emission (use @research-synthesis-engine); package adoption or Lake dependency decisions (use @lean-package-research); proof writing (use @lean-proof); review (use @lean-review-council).
  • TRIGGERS: research, mathlib lookup, find lemma, theorem search, Loogle, Moogle, Reservoir, package search, literature search, web search, what does X mean, typed research, M protocol, T protocol, L protocol.

Workflow

  1. Classify the research trigger (handbook Part 1) — confirm research is warranted vs proceeding with current evidence.
  2. Pick a method (handbook Part 2), a depth level (handbook Part 4), and the applicable discovery-ladder type: Symbol, Package, Literature, or Strategy.
  3. Run the discovery ladder in references/discovery-ladder.md whenever the answer depends on an existing theorem, package, or literature anchor. Record misses with the negative-result block from that reference.
  4. If the question is typed, switch to the typed protocol (handbook Part 9: M = Mathlib, T = Tactic, L = Literature, S = Strategy, D = Domain, X = Cross-domain, E = Empirical).
  5. Emit the standard output triple (handbook Part 3): Findings + Recommended Strategy + Zettel notes.
  6. Hand off the recommended strategy to the consumer skill (handbook Part 7 mapping).

Recovery & STOP

  • STOP if findings contradict the Rumsfeld matrix classification (handbook Part 5) — re-classify the question first.
  • STOP if Mathlib version drift is suspected — re-verify symbol existence at the current pin per the verification discipline memory.
  • STOP before calling a negative theorem/package result exhaustive unless the discovery ladder's required rungs and query variants are recorded.
  • STOP if the question would benefit from cross-disciplinary research (handbook Part 9 X-protocol) — escalate to @research-council.

Handoffs

  • Predecessors: agent:gateway, skill:lean-proof, skill:lean-proof-review, skill:lean-specification, skill:lean-blueprint.
  • Successors: skill:lean-zettelkasten, skill:research-council, skill:research-synthesis-engine, skill:lean-package-research, skill:lean-proof, skill:lean-proof-review.

Detailed reference

Full methodology content (Parts 1–9) lives in references/lean-research-handbook.md. Load that file when the skill is convened; the SKILL.md only carries the dispatch contract and a parts index.

SectionTopicCovers
Part 1Research TriggersWhen to research vs proceed
Part 2Research MethodsWebFetch / WebSearch / Mathlib grep / repo grep / sub-agent
Part 3Research Output StandardsFindings + recommended strategy + Zettel
Part 4Research Depth LevelsShallow / Standard / Deep / Exhaustive
Part 5Epistemic Mapping IntegrationRumsfeld matrix bridge
Part 6Review Council IntegrationΣ/Φ delegation paths
Part 7Domain Skill Cross-ReferencesPer-domain skill dispatch
Part 8Research Anti-PatternsWhat to avoid
Part 9Typed Research Protocols (M / T / L / S / D / X / E)Mathlib / Tactic / Literature / Strategy / Domain / Cross / Empirical

See also

What ships with it: 1 file

434 B alongside SKILL.md

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.