agentsclimarketplace

Long form launch retro

Skill r-bart/scribetronic/packages/cli/templates/claude-code/.claude/skills/long-form-launch-retro

Editorial calendar + writing pipeline for Claude Code. CLI + plugin marketplace with 23 skills (orchestrators, long-form, short-form, shared) for one-newsletter-a-week-plus-derivatives publishing.

Install
npx -y skills add r-bart/scribetronic --skill long-form-launch-retro

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Post-launch breakdown (~800-1500 words). What you shipped, the numbers (good or bad), what worked, what didn't, what you'd change next time. Use after every product/launch/release where you have real numbers to share — including (especially) when the numbers are embarrassing.

SKILL.md

3.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Metadata

  • inherits: ../writing-style/SKILL.md
  • length target: 800-1500 words
  • cadence: per launch

long-form-launch-retro

A retrospective on a launch. Numbers up front (especially when they're bad), what you tried, what worked, what you'd change. Honesty with numbers is the differentiator — most launches get written up as victory laps; this format works because it doesn't.

Voice and tone come from writing-style/SKILL.md.

Structure

[Title: states what launched + the headline number. Example shapes (replace with your own):
  - "<product name> launched. €0 in sales. Here's what I learned."
  - "<product name> shipped to 8 free signups and zero paid. Notes."
  Don't bury the lede.]
[Subtitle: 1 sentence — what you're going to walk through.]

[Opener (2-3 sentences): when, what, who it was for.]

## What it is

[2-3 sentences. The product, the problem, the audience. Be concrete. No "all-in-one solution" language.]

## The launch

[What you actually did. List of channels, prep, timing. Bullets work here.]

## The numbers

[Cold, formatted, no padding:
  - Revenue: €X
  - Free signups: X
  - Coupons redeemed: X (per channel)
  - Traffic: X
  - Whatever else you tracked.
If a number is zero, write "Zero." Don't soften.]

## What I expected vs what happened

[1-2 paragraphs. What was your honest expectation going in? What actually happened? Where was the gap?]

## What worked

[2-4 specific things. NOT "the community was supportive" — name the channel, the post, the conversation, the conversion.]

## What didn't

[2-4 specific things. Same rule.]

## What I'd change

[2-4 concrete adjustments for next time. NOT lessons — adjustments. Things you'd actually do differently.]

## Next steps for [product]

[3-5 dated, concrete actions for the product going forward. Or: "I'm shelving it. Here's why."]

[Closer (1-2 sentences): forward-looking, declarative. Naming the next launch with date works well: "Product #2 drops on August 16th. Same approach, different itch."]

Rules specific to this format

  • Numbers are the headline. Including in the title when possible. Especially if they're embarrassing — that's the differentiation.
  • Expected vs actual is the heart of the post. Without it, it's just a launch announcement. With it, it's a useful retro.
  • Specifics beat themes. "The Discord post in #launches got 3 sales" beats "social media drove conversions".
  • No silver lining for the sake of it. If it bombed, say it bombed. Trust comes from this.
  • Verdict on the product. Every launch-retro must end with: continue / pivot / shelve. No suspense closures.

Anti-patterns specific to this format

  • "It wasn't about the sales, it was about the learning" — kill on sight. The sales matter AND the learning matters. Both, separately.
  • Hiding zeros behind framing. "Modest reception" when it sold zero. No.
  • Lessons listed without ties to specific events from the launch.
  • Soft closer like "on to the next one!" — replace with a dated commitment.
  • Three-adjective stacks describing the product. One adjective, earned.

Workflow

  1. Pull the numbers cold from your tools. Write them down in raw form.
  2. Write your honest pre-launch expectation. Be specific (you wrote it down somewhere — find it).
  3. Walk through what you did, channel by channel. Note results next to each.
  4. Sort outcomes into worked / didn't.
  5. Translate "didn't" into concrete adjustments for next time.
  6. Decide the verdict: continue, pivot, or shelve.
  7. Run editing-pass and ai-slop-check.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.