Validating product market fit
Skill qte77/claude-code-plugins/plugins/market-research/skills/validating-product-market-fit
Score product-market fit from Phase 1B market analysis; produce PMF score, evidence matrix, and risk register. Run after `researching-market` (Phase 2).From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add qte77/claude-code-plugins --skill validating-product-market-fitAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
3.1 KB, 711 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Validating Product-Market Fit (Phase 2)
Target: $ARGUMENTS
Phase 2 of the GTM pipeline. Depends on Phase 1B. Scores PMF across multiple dimensions using evidence from prior phases.
Mode Awareness
Read config/mode.md before starting:
concise— Overall PMF score + top 3 evidence points + top 2 risksdetailed— Full per-dimension scoring, evidence matrix, risk register with mitigationsconservative— Weight negative evidence heavily; set high evidence barambitious— Weight leading indicators and analogous market signals; accept proxy evidence
Inputs
results/phase-1b/market-analysis.md— Market sizing and buyer personasresults/phase-0/capability-profile.md— Technical capabilitiesresults/phase-1a/competitor-map.md— Competitive contextconfig/validation_criteria.md— Phase 2 quality gatesconfig/mode.md— Style and approach settings
PMF Scoring Dimensions
Score each dimension 1-10, then compute weighted average:
| Dimension | Weight | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Problem severity | 25% | How painful is the problem for buyers? |
| Solution fit | 25% | How well does the product solve it? |
| Market timing | 20% | Is the market ready? |
| Competitive moat | 15% | Can differentiation be sustained? |
| Distribution path | 15% | Is there a clear route to customers? |
Workflow
- Read all Phase 0, 1A, 1B outputs
- Score each dimension with evidence justification
- Compute weighted PMF score (0-10)
- Identify PMF risks — What would invalidate each dimension?
- Propose mitigations for top risks
- Validate against criteria — Check
config/validation_criteria.mdPhase 2 gates
Output
Write to results/phase-2/:
pmf-assessment.md
# Product-Market Fit Assessment
## PMF Score: [X.X] / 10
## Dimension Scores
| Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|-----------|-------|----------|
| Problem severity | [X]/10 | [evidence] |
| Solution fit | [X]/10 | [evidence] |
| Market timing | [X]/10 | [evidence] |
| Competitive moat | [X]/10 | [evidence] |
| Distribution path | [X]/10 | [evidence] |
## Evidence For PMF
- [evidence point] — Source: [phase output or URL]
## Evidence Against PMF
- [counter-evidence] — Source: [phase output or URL]
## PMF Risk Register
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|-----------|--------|------------|
| [risk] | H/M/L | H/M/L | [approach] |
## Recommendation
[Proceed to GTM / Iterate on product / Pivot hypothesis]
Rules
- Both supporting and contradicting evidence are mandatory
- Score deflation is preferable to inflation — honest assessment protects GTM investment
- Mitigation suggestions must be actionable, not generic
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.