Expert council

Skill puretechnyc/purebrain-skills/skills/operations/expert-council

Production-tested Claude Code skills for marketing, operations, and business automation. Built by PureBrain.

Install

npx -y skills add puretechnyc/purebrain-skills --skill expert-council

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Dynamic Expert Council QA system. Selects domain-relevant expert personas to review deliverables before final delivery. 3 tiers with build/review mode toggle. Works with any AI assistant.

SKILL.md

4.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Dynamic Expert Council QA

Run your work through a simulated expert review panel before publishing. Select domain-relevant expert personas, get scored feedback, and identify improvements you would have missed.

Modes

BUILD MODE (default)

Council is OFF
Fast iteration, no review gates
Creative freedom during design/development
Council only activates when explicitly triggered

REVIEW MODE (triggered)

Activated by: "run it through the council" or "ready for review" or "final review"
Runs tiered QA on the deliverable
Returns scored feedback + recommendations
Deactivates after review completes (back to build mode)

Tiers

TIER 1 -- Quick Check (1 expert, ~30 seconds)

Trigger: Internal docs, messages, quick updates
Expert: Brand/product insider only
Output: Brand voice check, accuracy flag, go/no-go

TIER 2 -- Standard Review (2-3 experts, ~1-2 min)

Trigger: Social posts, emails, blog drafts, content
Experts: 2 domain-relevant + brand insider
Output: Per-expert strengths/weaknesses/improvements, synthesis

TIER 3 -- Full Council (5 experts + cross-review, ~3-5 min)

Trigger: Homepage launches, pricing pages, investor materials, major campaigns
Experts: 4 domain-relevant + brand insider
Process: Independent review > cross-review > chairman synthesis
Output: Full QA report, scored improvements, go/no-go with conditions

Auto-Trigger Rules (optional)

These deliverable types auto-trigger the council BEFORE publishing/sending:

Email campaigns to subscriber list > Tier 2
Homepage deploy to production > Tier 3
Social posts > Tier 1
Client deliverables > Tier 2
Investor materials > Tier 3
Pricing/offer changes > Tier 3

Design iterations, drafts, internal docs > NEVER auto-trigger.

Expert Selection

Identify the deliverable TYPE (email, website, copy, social, video, proposal, etc.)
Load your expert roster (see recommended panel below)
Filter experts by matching domain tags
Select top 2-4 based on tier level
Always include your brand/product insider

Recommended Expert Panels

Review Type	Recommended Panel	When to Use
Landing Page Copy	Alex Hormozi, Russell Brunson, David Ogilvy	Any conversion page
Brand & Positioning	Seth Godin, April Dunford, Marty Neumeier	Messaging, category creation
Social Media	Gary Vaynerchuk, Ann Handley, Joe Pulizzi	Social posts, engagement
Sales Messaging	Chris Voss, Aaron Ross, Jill Konrath	Emails, objection handling
Email Marketing	Chase Dimond, Russell Brunson, Ann Handley	Sequences, newsletters
Product Strategy	Steve Jobs, Jeff Bezos, Peter Thiel	Product decisions, roadmap
Pricing & Offers	Alex Hormozi, Hermann Simon, Russell Brunson	Pricing pages, offers
SEO & Content	Neil Patel, Rand Fishkin, Eli Schwartz	SEO strategy, content marketing

Review Process (per expert)

Each expert persona receives:

The deliverable content
Their persona/framework description
3 questions to answer:
1. What works well? (specific elements)
2. What needs improvement? (specific issues with suggested fixes)
3. Score 1-10: How ready is this for the target audience?

Cross-Review (Tier 3 only)

After all experts submit:

Each expert sees the others' reviews
Each responds: "Strongest point from another reviewer?" and "What did we ALL miss?"
Chairman synthesizes into final report

Output Format

EXPERT COUNCIL REVIEW
Tier: [1/2/3]
Asset: [description]
Experts: [names]

[Expert 1 Name] (Score: X/10)
+ [strength]
- [improvement needed]
Suggestion: [specific fix]

[Expert 2 Name] (Score: X/10)
...

SYNTHESIS:
Average Score: X/10
Top 3 Improvements:
1. [most impactful fix]
2. [second fix]
3. [third fix]
Recommendation: [GO / GO WITH CHANGES / HOLD]

How to Use with Claude Code

You: "Review this landing page copy through the expert council at Tier 2"

Claude: [Adopts Hormozi persona, reviews, scores]
        [Adopts Brunson persona, reviews, scores]
        [Synthesizes both reviews into actionable improvements]

Built by PureBrain -- AI-powered marketing operations.

Want the full suite of 183+ production-tested skills? Start your trial ->