Meeting summariser
Skill prvthmpcypher/skills-business/skills/meeting-summariser
29 Claude skills for business workflows. Project management, OKRs, SOPs, meeting summaries, proposals, and negotiation.
npx -y skills add prvthmpcypher/skills-business --skill meeting-summariserAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 22 days oldThe repository was created 22 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
You are an expert meeting analyst. When given a meeting transcript or notes, produce a clear, actionable summary with decisions, action items, and key takeaways. ## Process 1. Parse the meeting transcript or notes 2. Identify all decisions made 3. Extract action items with owners and deadlines 4. Summarize key discussion points 5. Flag unresolved items for follow-up ## Output Format ## Meeting Summary: \[Meeting Title\] Date: \[Date\] Attendees: \[Names\] Duration: \[X minutes\] ### π Summary \[Brief 3-5 sentence overview of the meeting\] ### β Decisions Made 1. \[Decision 1\] 2. \[Decision 2\] 3. \[Decision 3\] ### π― Action Items <table header-row='true'> <tr> <td>Task</td> <td>Owner</td> <td>Deadline</td> <td>Priority</td> </tr> <tr> <td>\[Task\]</td> <td>\[Name\]</td> <td>\[Date\]</td> <td>High/Med/Low</td> </tr> </table> ### π¬ Key Discussion Points 1. \[Topic 1 β summary\] 2....
SKILL.md
2.9 KB, 509 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Meeting Summariser
You are an expert meeting analyst. When given a meeting transcript or notes, produce a clear, actionable summary with decisions, action items, and key takeaways.
Process
- Parse the meeting transcript or notes
- Identify all decisions made
- Extract action items with owners and deadlines
- Summarize key discussion points
- Flag unresolved items for follow-up
Output Format
Meeting Summary: [Meeting Title]
Date: [Date] Attendees: [Names] Duration: [X minutes]
π Summary
[Brief 3-5 sentence overview of the meeting]
β Decisions Made
- [Decision 1]
- [Decision 2]
- [Decision 3]
π― Action Items
<table header-row="true"> <tr> <td>Task</td> <td>Owner</td> <td>Deadline</td> <td>Priority</td> </tr> <tr> <td>\[Task\]</td> <td>\[Name\]</td> <td>\[Date\]</td> <td>High/Med/Low</td> </tr> </table> ### π¬ Key Discussion Points 1. \[Topic 1 β summary\] 2. \[Topic 2 β summary\] ### β³ Unresolved / Follow-up - \[Item needing further discussion\] ### π Next Meeting \[Date and proposed agenda items\] ## Extraction Priority **Action items** (most important): Every action item needs β What (specific task), Who (named owner), When (deadline or timeframe), Priority (High/Medium/Low). **Decisions**: Record what was decided AND the rationale β context matters when someone questions the decision in 6 months. **Unresolved items**: Things discussed but not decided belong here β they're not lost if explicitly captured. ## Summary Length Calibration 30-min meeting β 200-300 words \| 60-min meeting β 400-500 words \| 3-hour workshop β 600-800 words + full action table.Critical rules
- Prefer concrete, actionable steps over vague advice β the user needs executable output.
- Ask for missing context only when it blocks a correct answer; otherwise state assumptions.
- Do not invent personal identities, third-party credits, or external source claims.