Dns
This skill should be used when the user asks about "DNS", "domain resolution", "GeoDNS / geo routing", "latency-based routing", "weighted / failover routing", "Route 53 / Cloud DNS", an "A/CNAME/ALIAS record", "anycast", or "DNS TTL / propagation". It gives the global front door that maps a name to the right IP and steers users to the right region or endpoint. Use it whenever a design must direct traffic across regions/data centers, do health-checked failover at the name layer, or expose a stable hostname even if the user doesn't say "DNS".From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add proyecto26/system-design-skills --skill dnsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
SKILL.md
11.2 KB, ~2.6k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
DNS
DNS is the global front door: it turns a name (api.example.com) into an address
before any request reaches your servers. It is also a routing layer — the same
lookup can hand different clients different answers (by region, latency, health,
or weight). Get it wrong and clients reach a dead region, fail over in minutes
instead of seconds, or cache a bad answer for hours. It is not a load balancer
and not a CDN; it decides which endpoint a client is told to use, not how bytes
are balanced inside that endpoint.
When to reach for this
A service is reachable by a stable hostname; traffic must be steered to the closest or healthiest region/data center; or an endpoint's IP can change (a new load balancer, a failover site) and clients must follow without code changes. Multi-region or multi-data-center designs need DNS to pick the entry point; single-region designs still need it for a stable, movable name.
When NOT to
Routing inside one region — that is a load balancer's job (→ load-balancing),
which reacts in milliseconds, not TTL-bound minutes. Fine-grained per-request or
session-aware steering — DNS answers per lookup, then the client caches it. Fast
failover with sub-second recovery — DNS failover is gated by TTL and resolver
caching; do not promise instant cutover from the name layer. And do not reach for
exotic routing policies before a number shows users are spread across regions
(YAGNI) — a single A/ALIAS record is the right default for one region.
Clarify first
- Geographic spread — one region or many? Where are the users? (→
requirements-scoping) - Failover target — recovery time objective for losing a region: seconds, or "a few minutes is fine"?
- How dynamic is the endpoint — fixed IPs, or an LB hostname that changes? (drives
AvsCNAME/ALIAS) - Steering goal — closest by latency, by user geography, by weight (canary/A-B), or just round-robin?
- Staleness tolerance for the mapping — how long can a client keep a stale answer? (sets the TTL →
back-of-the-envelope)
The options
Record type (what the name returns)
A/AAAA— name → IPv4 / IPv6. Use when the endpoint has a stable IP.CNAME— name → another name. Use to alias onto a provider hostname; never at the zone apex (example.com).ALIAS/ANAME(provider-specific) — apex alias to a hostname. Use to pointexample.comat an LB/CDN hostname.NS/MX/TXT— delegation, mail, verification. Use as the domain requires; not traffic steering.
Routing policy (which answer a client gets)
- Simple — one answer for everyone. Use for a single endpoint.
- Weighted — split by percentage. Use for canary, A/B, or shifting between clusters.
- Latency-based — answer the region with lowest measured latency to the resolver. Use to minimize round-trip.
- Geolocation / GeoDNS — answer by the client's location (data residency, localized content). Use when geography, not latency, must decide.
- Failover — primary while healthy, else secondary. Use for active-passive DR.
- Multivalue — return several healthy IPs; client picks. Use for cheap client-side spread with health pruning.
Reachability
- Anycast — one IP advertised from many sites; the network routes to the nearest. Use for resolver/CDN front ends and DDoS resilience (concept lives in
content-delivery).
Trade-offs
| Option | What it solves | What it worsens | Change it when |
|---|---|---|---|
Simple A/ALIAS | Trivial; one stable name | No steering, no failover; SPOF if the IP dies | Traffic spans regions or needs DR → weighted/latency/failover |
| Weighted | Gradual shifts, canary, cluster balancing | Manual/slow; not health-aware unless paired with checks | You need automatic closeness → latency; or automatic cutover → failover |
| Latency-based | Lowest RTT per user automatically | Routes to resolver location, not user; needs per-region endpoints | Data residency matters more than speed → geolocation |
| Geolocation | Compliance, localized answers | Misroutes via VPN/forwarding resolvers; coarse map | Speed matters more than geography → latency-based |
| Failover | Automatic active-passive cutover | Recovery bounded by TTL + caching; cold standby risk | RTO must be sub-second → in-region LB, not DNS |
| Anycast | Nearest entry + absorbs DDoS | Operationally heavy (BGP); flap on route changes | You only have one site → not worth it |
Behavior under stress
DNS fails in slow, wide ways — a bad answer or an authoritative outage affects everyone who looks up next, and lingers as long as TTLs allow.
- TTL caching delays recovery and propagation. Resolvers and OS/browser caches hold answers for the TTL; some ISPs over-cache. A failover or IP change only takes effect as old entries expire — the effective recovery time is TTL plus stragglers, not zero.
- Authoritative DNS as a SPOF. If your authoritative servers (or a single managed zone) go down, nothing resolves, even though your servers are healthy. Use a provider on anycast across many sites; consider a secondary DNS provider.
- Health-check stampede / flapping. Aggressive health checks across many
endpoints can hammer targets, and a flapping check can oscillate answers,
scattering clients. Tune interval, failure threshold, and require N consecutive
failures (→
resilience-failureowns health-check tuning). - Low-TTL load. Cutting TTL to seconds for fast failover multiplies lookup QPS against authoritative servers and removes the cache cushion during an attack.
- DDoS on the resolver tier. DNS is a classic amplification/DDoS target; an overwhelmed resolver makes your whole property unreachable.
Monitor: resolution latency and error/SERVFAIL rate, query QPS per record, health-check status per endpoint, time-to-propagate after a change, and the share of traffic each region/answer actually receives.
How to apply
- Clarify the inputs — geographic spread, RTO for a region loss, endpoint stability, steering goal, and mapping staleness (see Clarify first). One region with a fixed entry point needs only a simple record — stop there.
- Pick the policy from the trade-off table — choose a record type (
ALIASat the apex onto an LB/CDN hostname is the common default) and a routing policy keyed to the steering goal: weighted for canary, latency for speed, geo for residency, failover for active-passive DR. - Set the key knobs — TTL (balance fast failover against lookup load and propagation), health-check interval and failure threshold, and the failover target. Decide secondary-DNS / anycast posture up front.
- Stress-test the choice — walk Behavior under stress: confirm the TTL gives an acceptable effective recovery time, the authoritative tier is not a SPOF, and health checks won't flap or stampede.
- Size it with numbers — estimate lookup QPS at the chosen TTL and the propagation window a change implies (→ Numbers that matter).
- Pick a provider — default to the generic recipe; open a provider file only if the user named a cloud (see Choosing a provider).
Dos and don'ts
Do
- Put steering at DNS for cross-region choice and let an LB balance within a region.
- Use
ALIAS/ANAMEat the apex onto an LB/CDN hostname so IP changes need no edits. - Pair routing policies with health checks so dead regions stop being handed out.
- Run authoritative DNS on anycast across many sites; consider a second provider.
- Set TTL deliberately — short enough for your RTO, long enough to survive load.
Don't
- Don't expect DNS failover to be instant; it is bounded by TTL plus resolver caching.
- Don't put a
CNAMEat the zone apex — it is invalid; useALIAS/ANAME. - Don't trust geolocation for security or precise placement (VPNs and forwarders lie).
- Don't run a single authoritative zone as a SPOF for an otherwise multi-region design.
- Don't drop TTL to seconds everywhere "just in case" — it multiplies query load.
Numbers that matter
The quantities to estimate: the TTL, which sets both the propagation window
and the effective failover time (a 60 s TTL means up to ~60 s-plus of staleness,
not instant); the lookup QPS the TTL implies against authoritative servers
(shorter TTL → more queries); and a resolution latency budget (one extra
round trip, largely hidden by caching). Anchor these with rules of thumb and
peak-multiplier math in back-of-the-envelope — don't restate its tables here.
Interface sketch
A DNS record is a contract: name (api.example.com), type (A/AAAA/
CNAME/ALIAS), value (IP or target hostname), TTL (seconds), and an
optional routing policy + health check. Example as a zone line:
api.example.com. 60 IN A 203.0.113.10 ; latency-policy, region us-east, health-check id hc-1
Decide per record: which policy selects it, what health check gates it, and the TTL that bounds its staleness.
Choosing a provider
Default to the generic recipe above. If the user names a cloud, read
references/providers/<provider>.md for the managed-service mapping,
quotas/limits, and provider-specific trade-offs. If no file exists for that
provider, the generic recipe is the answer.
Diagram
To visualize the resolution path (client → recursive resolver → root/TLD/
authoritative → answer) or a geo/latency-steered multi-region front door, use the
in-plugin architecture-diagram skill. A quick inline sketch:
client → resolver → authoritative (policy: latency) → region A | region B.
Related building blocks
load-balancing— complements this: DNS spreads traffic across regions/endpoints, while an LB spreads requests within a region and reacts in milliseconds.content-delivery— pairs with this: CDNs route users to edge POPs via anycast and DNS, and the anycast/edge-caching concept is owned there.resilience-failure— feeds into this: health-check tuning, failover, and degradation patterns (and rate limiting) are owned there and gate DNS failover.back-of-the-envelope— feeds into this: it supplies the TTL/QPS/latency math that sizes the record set and propagation window.system-design— owned-concept lives in the orchestrator: the reasoning loop, the trade-off method, and the ten failure modes.
References
references/deep-dive.md— resolution hierarchy (recursive vs authoritative, root/TLD), the full record-type set, how TTL/propagation really behaves, anycast mechanics, and health-checked failover internals. Read when designing the DNS layer in detail.references/providers/{generic,aws,azure,gcp}.md— service mappings, limits, and pitfalls per environment.
What ships with it: 5 files
14.0 KB alongside SKILL.md
references/
- deep-dive.md5.4 KB
- providers/aws.md2.0 KB
- providers/azure.md2.0 KB
- providers/gcp.md2.1 KB
- providers/generic.md2.5 KB