Prowler compliance review
Skill prowler-cloud/prowler/skills/prowler-compliance-review
Reviews Pull Requests that add or modify compliance frameworks. Trigger: When reviewing PRs with compliance framework changes, CIS/NIST/PCI-DSS additions, or compliance JSON files.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add prowler-cloud/prowler --skill prowler-compliance-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its file declares
Copied from the file, not written here
The file declares its own license as Apache-2.0. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
5.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
When to Use
- Reviewing PRs that add new compliance frameworks
- Reviewing PRs that modify existing compliance frameworks
- Validating compliance framework JSON structure before merge
Review Checklist (Critical)
| Check | Command/Method | Pass Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| JSON Valid | python3 -m json.tool file.json | No syntax errors |
| All Checks Exist | Run validation script | 0 missing checks |
| No Duplicate IDs | Run validation script | 0 duplicate requirement IDs |
| Changelog fragment | Manual review | Fragment present under prowler/changelog.d/ |
| Dashboard File | Compare with existing | Follows established pattern |
| Framework Metadata | Manual review | All required fields populated |
Commands
# 1. Validate JSON syntax
python3 -m json.tool prowler/compliance/{provider}/{framework}.json > /dev/null \
&& echo "Valid JSON" || echo "INVALID JSON"
# 2. Run full validation script
python3 skills/prowler-compliance-review/assets/validate_compliance.py \
prowler/compliance/{provider}/{framework}.json
# 3. Compare dashboard with existing (find similar framework)
diff dashboard/compliance/{new_framework}.py \
dashboard/compliance/{existing_framework}.py
Decision Tree
JSON Valid?
├── No → FAIL: Fix JSON syntax errors
└── Yes ↓
All Checks Exist in Codebase?
├── Missing checks → FAIL: Add missing checks or remove from framework
└── All exist ↓
Duplicate Requirement IDs?
├── Yes → FAIL: Fix duplicate IDs
└── No ↓
Changelog Fragment Present?
├── No → REQUEST CHANGES: Add changelog fragment
└── Yes ↓
Dashboard File Follows Pattern?
├── No → REQUEST CHANGES: Fix dashboard pattern
└── Yes ↓
Framework Metadata Complete?
├── No → REQUEST CHANGES: Add missing metadata
└── Yes → APPROVE
Framework Structure Reference
Compliance frameworks are JSON files in: prowler/compliance/{provider}/{framework}.json
{
"Framework": "CIS",
"Name": "CIS Provider Benchmark vX.Y.Z",
"Version": "X.Y",
"Provider": "AWS|Azure|GCP|...",
"Description": "Framework description...",
"Requirements": [
{
"Id": "1.1",
"Description": "Requirement description",
"Checks": ["check_name_1", "check_name_2"],
"Attributes": [
{
"Section": "1 Section Name",
"SubSection": "1.1 Subsection (optional)",
"Profile": "Level 1|Level 2",
"AssessmentStatus": "Automated|Manual",
"Description": "...",
"RationaleStatement": "...",
"ImpactStatement": "...",
"RemediationProcedure": "...",
"AuditProcedure": "...",
"AdditionalInformation": "...",
"References": "...",
"DefaultValue": "..."
}
]
}
]
}
Common Issues
| Issue | How to Detect | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| Missing checks | Validation script reports missing | Add check implementation or remove from Checks array |
| Duplicate IDs | Validation script reports duplicates | Ensure each requirement has unique ID |
| Empty Checks for Automated | AssessmentStatus is Automated but Checks is empty | Add checks or change to Manual |
| Wrong file location | Framework not in prowler/compliance/{provider}/ | Move to correct directory |
| Missing dashboard file | No corresponding dashboard/compliance/{framework}.py | Create dashboard file following pattern |
| Changelog fragment missing | No fragment file in the PR diff | Add a fragment under prowler/changelog.d/ |
Dashboard File Pattern
Dashboard files must be in dashboard/compliance/ and follow this exact pattern:
import warnings
from dashboard.common_methods import get_section_containers_cis
warnings.filterwarnings("ignore")
def get_table(data):
aux = data[
[
"REQUIREMENTS_ID",
"REQUIREMENTS_DESCRIPTION",
"REQUIREMENTS_ATTRIBUTES_SECTION",
"CHECKID",
"STATUS",
"REGION",
"ACCOUNTID",
"RESOURCEID",
]
].copy()
return get_section_containers_cis(
aux, "REQUIREMENTS_ID", "REQUIREMENTS_ATTRIBUTES_SECTION"
)
Testing the Compliance Framework
After validation passes, test the framework with Prowler:
# Verify framework is detected
uv run python prowler-cli.py {provider} --list-compliance | grep {framework}
# Run a quick test with a single check from the framework
uv run python prowler-cli.py {provider} --compliance {framework} --check {check_name}
# Run full compliance scan (dry-run with limited checks)
uv run python prowler-cli.py {provider} --compliance {framework} --checks-limit 5
# Generate compliance report in multiple formats
uv run python prowler-cli.py {provider} --compliance {framework} -M csv json html
Resources
- Validation Script: See assets/validate_compliance.py
- Related Skills: See prowler-compliance for creating frameworks
- Documentation: See references/review-checklist.md