Project maintenance
Skill Pratiyush/agent-catalog/skills/skill/project-maintenance
Marketplace for AI Agent Skills, Prompts, Agents, and MCP servers. Powered by @skillscraft.
npx -y skills add Pratiyush/agent-catalog --skill project-maintenanceAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Maintain project health by enforcing PR checklists, tracking open issues, verifying release readiness, and ensuring framework phases are up to date. Use when reviewing PRs, creating issues, preparing releases, or auditing project state.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
6.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Project Maintenance
When to use this skill
Activate when the user wants to:
- Review a PR against the project checklist before merging
- Create a well-structured GitHub issue from a bug report or feature request
- Check if the project is release-ready (all checks green, issues triaged, changelog updated)
- Audit the project for stale issues, missing labels, or incomplete PRs
- Verify framework development phase compliance (alpha/beta/RC/stable)
Instructions
PR Review Checklist
When reviewing a PR, run through every item. Report pass/fail for each:
node scripts/pr-checklist.js --pr <number>
The script checks:
- Title — follows conventional commits (
feat:,fix:,docs:,chore:,refactor:) - Description — has a
## Summarysection with at least one bullet point - Tests — CI status is green; no skipped required checks
- Build —
pnpm buildsucceeds with no new warnings - Lint —
pnpm lintpasses (no new violations) - Typecheck —
pnpm typecheckpasses - Changelog — CHANGELOG.md updated if the PR is user-facing
- Breaking changes — flagged in title with
!or in description withBREAKING CHANGE - Labels — PR has at least one label (bug, enhancement, documentation, etc.)
- Reviewers — at least one reviewer assigned
- Branch — source branch name is descriptive (not
patch-1ormain) - Files — no secrets, .env files, or large binaries committed
Output a markdown table with status for each item and an overall verdict.
Issue Creation
When creating an issue, use this structure:
node scripts/create-issue.js --title "<title>" --type <bug|feature|task> [--labels "label1,label2"] [--assignee "@user"]
The script generates a well-formed issue body:
Bug template:
- Steps to reproduce
- Expected vs actual behavior
- Environment details
- Severity assessment
Feature template:
- Problem statement
- Proposed solution
- Acceptance criteria
- Priority classification
Task template:
- Description
- Subtasks checklist
- Dependencies
- Definition of done
Release Readiness Check
Run the full release audit:
node scripts/release-check.js [--version <semver>]
This checks:
- All GitHub Actions workflows are green on the default branch
- No open P0/P1 issues blocking the release
- CHANGELOG.md has an entry for the target version
- Package versions are consistent across the monorepo
- All packages build successfully
- All tests pass (unit + e2e)
- No
TODOorFIXMEcomments referencing the current milestone - Dependencies are up to date (no critical security advisories)
- README and docs reference the correct version numbers
- Git tag doesn't already exist for the target version
Project Health Audit
Run periodically to catch drift:
node scripts/health-audit.js
Checks:
- Issues older than 30 days without activity → flag as stale
- PRs older than 7 days without review → flag for attention
- Issues without labels → flag for triage
- Milestone progress → report completion percentage
- Dependency freshness → list outdated packages
- Test coverage trends → warn if declining
OS Framework Phase Compliance
The project follows the Open Source Framework pipeline. Each phase has entry gates and deliverables:
0 CAPTURE → 1 VALIDATE → 1.5 STEERING → 2 BRAND → 3 STRUCTURE
→ 4 CONTENT → 5 CONTRIBUTION → 5.5 PRE-LAUNCH QA → 6 LAUNCH → 7 GROW → 8 MAINTAIN
| Phase | Name | Entry Gate | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Capture | Raw idea exists | Idea brief |
| 1 | Validate | Brief written | Scorecard (/25): BUILD or KILL |
| 1.5 | Project Steering | Score >= 20 | Steering doc with technical constraints |
| 2 | Brand | Steering approved | README header, LICENSE, npm name reserved |
| 3 | Structure | Brand defined | Repo layout, file schema, tasks.md |
| 4 | Content | Structure committed | Source code or .md files |
| 5 | Contribution | Content complete | PR/issue templates, CONTRIBUTING.md, CI |
| 5.5 | Pre-Launch QA | CI green | QA report, link audit, adversarial review |
| 6 | Launch | QA passed | Live repo, Reddit/HN/X posts |
| 7 | Grow | Launched | Stars, forks, contributors |
| 8 | Maintain | Growing | Monthly verification, merge PRs |
When checking phase compliance:
- Read
_progress.mdor infer current phase from repo state - Verify all entry gates for the current phase are met
- Check that the previous phase's deliverables exist
- Report any gaps blocking phase advancement
Version Phase Mapping
| Version Pattern | Release Phase | Requirements |
|---|---|---|
0.9.x | Pre-production | API may change, marked prerelease on GitHub |
1.0.0 | Production | Stable API, first non-prerelease |
x.y.z-alpha.N | Alpha | Core features working, known bugs OK |
x.y.z-beta.N | Beta | Feature-complete, no P0 bugs, docs started |
x.y.z-rc.N | RC | All tests green, docs complete, no P0/P1 bugs |
Task Tracking Rules
After completing ANY task:
- Mark it
[x]in tasks.md IMMEDIATELY - Update
_progress.mdwith current phase status - Update CHANGELOG.md for user-facing changes
- Each task = one commit, each commit = verified before push
PR Rules (from OS Framework)
- Each PR: ONE category or ONE structural change (never both)
- PR title: conventional commits (
feat:,fix:,docs:,chore:,refactor:) - PR body: list of changes with
## Summarysection - All content verified before PR
- VERY SMALL PRs preferred — one intent per PR
Output format
All scripts output structured JSON with a summary:
{
"check": "pr-checklist",
"target": "#42",
"passed": 10,
"failed": 2,
"warnings": 1,
"items": [
{ "name": "Title format", "status": "pass" },
{ "name": "Tests green", "status": "fail", "detail": "CI check 'typecheck' is pending" }
],
"verdict": "NEEDS_WORK"
}
Verdicts: READY (all pass), NEEDS_WORK (any fail), WARNING (no fails but has warnings)
Gotchas
- Requires
ghCLI to be authenticated (gh auth status) - PR checks use the GitHub API — rate limits apply (5000 req/hr for authenticated users)
- The release check assumes conventional commits for changelog classification
- Health audit only checks the default branch, not feature branches
- Phase compliance reads
package.jsonversion — ensure it's updated before checking - Issue templates are opinionated — adjust the scripts for your team's conventions