agentsclimarketplace
Sign in

Documentation rfc

Skill planifest/planifest-framework/planifest-framework/external-skills/documentation-rfc

Author RFC documents for proposed technical changes with clear problem framing, options, tradeoffs, and decision path. Use when proposal alignment and review sign-off are needed before implementation; do not use for post-decision implementation-only docs.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add planifest/planifest-framework --skill documentation-rfc

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

2.3 KB, 402 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Documentation RFC

Overview

Use this skill to produce decision-ready RFCs that let stakeholders review options with clear tradeoffs and risks.

Scope Boundaries

  • Use this skill when the task matches the trigger condition described in description.
  • Do not use this skill when the primary task falls outside this skill's domain.

Shared References

  • Decision quality checks:
    • references/rfc-decision-quality-checks.md

Templates And Assets

  • RFC template:
    • assets/rfc-template.md
  • Tradeoff matrix template:
    • assets/rfc-tradeoff-matrix-template.csv

Inputs To Gather

  • Problem statement and business/technical motivation.
  • Constraints and non-goals.
  • Candidate options and evaluation criteria.
  • Risks, rollout implications, and decision timeline.

Deliverables

  • RFC with context, options, recommendation, and rationale.
  • Tradeoff table and risk assessment.
  • Open questions and decision dependencies.
  • Review checklist and approval path.

Quick RFC Skeleton

  1. Problem and goals/non-goals.
  2. Constraints and assumptions.
  3. Options considered (including rejected options).
  4. Recommendation and rationale.
  5. Risks, rollout, and rollback considerations.
  6. Open questions and required approvals.

Quality Standard

  • Problem framing is concrete and scope-bounded.
  • Options are comparable with explicit criteria.
  • Recommendation includes why alternatives were rejected.
  • Risks and unknowns are clearly separated.

Workflow

  1. Define problem scope and success criteria.
  2. Collect options and evaluation evidence.
  3. Compare options with explicit tradeoff criteria in assets/rfc-tradeoff-matrix-template.csv.
  4. Draft recommendation and risk treatment plan using assets/rfc-template.md.
  5. Publish for review with clear decision deadlines.

Failure Conditions

  • Stop when recommendation lacks option comparison evidence.
  • Stop when major risks/unknowns are hidden or untracked.
  • Escalate when required approvers are missing for high-impact decisions.

What ships with it: 1 file

11.3 KB alongside SKILL.md

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,758. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.