Design qa implementation parity
Skill planifest/planifest-framework/planifest-framework/external-skills/design-qa-implementation-parity
Verify implementation parity against approved design specs with severity-based decisions and fix guidance. Use when implemented UI must be compared against approved specs before release or sign-off; do not use for backend data-model or deployment pipeline decisions.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add planifest/planifest-framework --skill design-qa-implementation-parityAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
2.7 KB, 495 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Design Qa Implementation Parity
Overview
Use this skill to detect and triage design-to-implementation drift with evidence that engineers and designers can both act on.
Scope Boundaries
- Use this skill when the task matches the trigger condition described in
description. - Do not use this skill when the primary task falls outside this skill's domain.
Shared References
- Severity classification model:
references/parity-severity-model.md
Templates And Assets
- Findings log:
assets/parity-findings-template.csv
- Sign-off decision document:
assets/parity-signoff-template.md
Inputs To Gather
- Approved design source and exact version/snapshot.
- Target implementation build, environment, and feature flags.
- Scope list of screens, states, breakpoints, and locales to validate.
- Existing acceptance criteria or release gates for UI parity.
Deliverables
- Parity findings report with severity, scope, owner, and reproduction steps.
- State-level pass/fail checklist for critical flows.
- Prioritized remediation plan with release impact notes.
- Sign-off decision (approve/conditional/reject) with clear rationale.
Quick Example
- Blocker: CTA button hidden on mobile breakpoint in checkout summary.
- Major: loading state typography differs from approved scale and causes truncation.
- Minor: icon spacing deviates by 2px without usability impact.
- Decision: reject until blocker fixed; allow major/minor with dated follow-up only if policy permits.
Quality Standard
- Source versions are locked so comparisons are deterministic.
- Coverage includes critical states: loading, empty, error, success.
- Every mismatch includes reproducible evidence and ownership.
- Severity rules are consistent and tied to user/business impact.
Workflow
- Freeze source design and implementation versions for the review window.
- Compare critical flows first, then secondary and edge states.
- Classify mismatches by severity and release impact using
references/parity-severity-model.md. - Record findings in
assets/parity-findings-template.csv, assign owners, and define remediation order. - Publish sign-off outcome in
assets/parity-signoff-template.mdwith unresolved risk explicitly documented.
Failure Conditions
- Stop sign-off when source versions are not locked.
- Stop when critical flows are missing parity coverage.
- Escalate when blocker-level mismatches remain unresolved near release.
What ships with it: 1 file
11.3 KB alongside SKILL.md
- attribution.txt11.3 KB