agentsclimarketplace

Nautilus offchain

Skill pivyme/suiperpower/core/skills/build/nautilus-offchain

Build something meaningful, on Sui. A superpower for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Grok Build) to ship real products on Sui.

Install
npx -y skills add pivyme/suiperpower --skill nautilus-offchain

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 12 stars12 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Integrate Nautilus offchain TEE compute for a Sui project. Use when the user mentions Nautilus.

SKILL.md

8.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Preamble (run first)

# Suiperpower telemetry. Routes through the CLI so projects.json + Convex stay in sync.
# Silent on failure so the skill never blocks. Opt out: SUIPERPOWER_TELEMETRY=off.
#
# AGENT NOTE: when this skill finishes, run the matching completion command:
#   suiperpower track nautilus-offchain build completed
# Or use "failed" / "aborted" if it ended that way.
command -v suiperpower >/dev/null 2>&1 && suiperpower track nautilus-offchain build started >/dev/null 2>&1 &
true

If TEL_PROMPTED is no, before doing real work, ask the user:

Help suiperpower get better. We track which skills get used and how long they take. No code, no file paths, no PII. Change anytime in ~/.suiperpower/config.json.

A) Sure, anonymous B) No thanks

Write the answer to ~/.suiperpower/config.json telemetryTier field and create ~/.suiperpower/.telemetry-prompted. Then continue.

What this skill does

Guides the user through building verifiable off-chain computation on Sui using Nautilus. The result is a Rust server running inside an AWS Nitro Enclave whose outputs are cryptographically verified by a Move contract on chain. Covers both the enclave-side Rust code and the on-chain Move verification logic.

When to use it

  • The project needs computation that cannot run on chain (API calls, heavy ML inference, private data processing).
  • The user wants verifiable off-chain results posted back to Sui with cryptographic proof.
  • The user mentions TEEs, Nitro Enclaves, or Nautilus.
  • The user needs an oracle-like pattern where off-chain data must be trusted on chain.

When NOT to use it

  • If the user has not picked a project yet, use find-next-sui-idea first.
  • If the user has not scaffolded a project, use scaffold-project first.
  • If the logic can run entirely on chain in Move, use build-with-move instead.
  • If the user only needs price feeds, use pyth-oracle instead.
  • If the user wants zero-knowledge proofs (not TEE attestation), this is the wrong tool. Point them to ZK resources.

If you activated this and the user actually wants something else, consult skills/SKILL_ROUTER.md and hand off.

Inputs

  • A Sui project (Move package and/or TS frontend).
  • Optional: .suiperpower/build-context.md from scaffold-project. Read it if present.
  • A description of what computation needs to happen off chain and what result goes on chain.

If unclear, interview the user for:

  • What computation runs off chain? (API call, ML model, data aggregation, random number generation)
  • What data does the on-chain contract need from the enclave? (a price, a score, a boolean, arbitrary bytes)
  • Does the enclave need to read on-chain state before computing?
  • What is the trust model? (Who runs the enclave? Single operator or decentralized?)

Outputs

  • A Move module using enclave::enclave to register and verify enclave signatures.

  • A Rust server (Axum) implementing the enclave logic with Nautilus SDK endpoints.

  • Integration code: PTB or TS that calls the enclave server, posts verified results on chain.

  • Append to .suiperpower/build-context.md:

    ## nautilus-offchain session, <timestamp>
    - enclave logic: <what it computes>
    - move module: <module::name>
    - rust server endpoints: <list>
    - pcr values: <pending build | recorded>
    - deployment: <local | AWS Nitro>
    - open issues: <list>
    

Workflow

  1. Decide if TEE is needed

    • Use the decision table below. If the computation can run on chain, steer the user to build-with-move.
    • If the user needs verifiable randomness only, check if Sui's native randomness module suffices first.
    • Confirm with the user before proceeding.
  2. Design the enclave logic

    • Define what the Rust server computes: inputs it receives via POST, outputs it returns.
    • Define the BCS payload struct. Field order matters: Rust and Move must match exactly.
    • Sketch the endpoints: health check, attestation, and the custom processing endpoint.
  3. Write the Move contract

    • Use enclave::enclave module functions. See references/nautilus-architecture.md for the full API.
    • Implement OTW pattern with new_cap<T> for admin capabilities.
    • Create EnclaveConfig with expected PCR values via create_enclave_config.
    • Write a function that calls verify_signature to validate enclave output before acting on it.
    • Add timestamp freshness checks manually (verify_signature does not enforce this).
  4. Build the Rust enclave server

    • Clone the Nautilus repo: git clone https://github.com/MystenLabs/nautilus.
    • Use the Axum server template. Implement GET /health_check, GET /get_attestation, and POST endpoint for the custom logic.
    • Ensure BCS serialization of the response payload matches the Move struct field order exactly.
    • Sign the payload with the enclave's ephemeral Ed25519 keypair.
  5. Deploy the Move package

    • Run sui move build and sui client publish.
    • Call create_enclave_config with the PCR values from the built enclave image.
    • Record the package ID and config object ID.
  6. Deploy the enclave

    • Build the Docker image for the Nitro Enclave.
    • Extract PCR0, PCR1, PCR2 values from the built image.
    • Deploy to AWS Nitro Enclave instance.
    • Call register_enclave on chain with the attestation document.
  7. Register on chain

    • Fetch the attestation from the running enclave via GET /get_attestation.
    • Call register_enclave<T>(config, attestation_doc, ctx) to register the enclave's public key.
    • Verify registration succeeded by checking the on-chain enclave object.
  8. Verify the integration

    • Send a real request to the enclave's processing endpoint.
    • Submit the signed response to the Move contract's verify function.
    • Confirm the on-chain state updated correctly.
    • Test with a tampered signature and confirm rejection.
  9. Closing handoff

    • If .suiperpower/intent.md exists and the session was non-trivial (new module, new sponsor integration, or material changes to public functions), recommend verify-against-intent as the next step so drift is caught before shipping.
    • If no intent.md exists and the session was non-trivial, surface that gap once: offer clarify-intent to backfill, do not force it.

Decision table: when to use Nautilus

ScenarioUse Nautilus?Alternative
Heavy computation (ML, data processing)YesNone on chain
External API calls (web2 data)YesPyth for price feeds specifically
Private data processingYesSeal for encryption-only use cases
Simple on-chain logicNobuild-with-move
Price feeds onlyNopyth-oracle
Verifiable randomness onlyNoSui native randomness module
ZK proof generationNoZK tooling (Circom, Noir)

Quality gate (anti-slop)

Before reporting done, the skill asks itself the following and refuses to declare success if any answer is no:

  • Does the Move package compile with sui move build?
  • Does verify_signature include a manual timestamp freshness check?
  • Do the BCS struct field orders match exactly between Rust and Move?
  • Was a real round-trip tested (enclave processes data, Move contract verifies signature)?
  • Was signature rejection tested (tampered or expired data fails verification)?
  • Are PCR values documented and the user understands they must rebuild and re-register on any code change?
  • Is the ephemeral keypair lifecycle documented (new key on every boot, must re-register)?

If any answer is no, the skill reports the gap and works through it before claiming the integration is complete.

References

On-demand references (load when relevant to the user's question):

  • references/nautilus-architecture.md: Move module API (enclave::enclave), Rust server setup, deployment flow.
  • references/nautilus-pitfalls.md: Key pitfalls with PCR values, BCS ordering, ephemeral keys, and timestamp freshness.

External docs (fetch at runtime for the latest API surface):

Use in your agent

  • Claude Code: claude "/suiper:nautilus-offchain <your message>"
  • Codex: codex "/nautilus-offchain <your message>"
  • Grok Build: run grok, then /nautilus-offchain <your message> in the session
  • Cursor: paste a chat message that includes a phrase like "off-chain compute" or "Nautilus TEE", or load ~/.cursor/rules/nautilus-offchain.mdc and reference it.

If you activated this and the user actually wants something else, consult skills/SKILL_ROUTER.md and hand off.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.