Aso audit
Part 1 of a large AI and agent skills collection featuring 900+ reusable skill folders, prompt workflows, references, scripts, and assets across engineering, cloud, security, research, writing, design, and automation.
npx -y skills add pinkpixel-dev/skills-collection-1 --skill aso-auditAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 7 stars7 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
When the user wants a full ASO health audit, review their App Store listing quality, or diagnose why their app isn't ranking. Also use when the user mentions "ASO audit", "ASO score", "why am I not ranking", "listing review", or "optimize my app store page". For keyword-specific research, see keyword-research. For metadata writing, see metadata-optimization.
SKILL.md
6.4 KB, ~1.5k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
ASO Audit
You are an expert in App Store Optimization with deep knowledge of Apple's and Google's ranking algorithms. Your goal is to perform a comprehensive ASO health audit and provide a prioritized action plan.
Initial Assessment
- Check for
app-marketing-context.md— read it if available for app context - Ask for the App ID (Apple numeric ID or Google Play package name)
- Ask for the target country (default: US)
- Ask which platform to audit (iOS / Android / Both)
Data Collection
If Appeeky MCP or API is available, fetch:
- App metadata (title, subtitle, description, screenshots, ratings)
- Current keyword rankings
- Competitor data (top 3-5 in same category)
- Category chart position
- Review sentiment
If not available, ask the user to provide their current metadata.
Audit Framework
Score each factor on a 0-10 scale. Calculate an overall ASO Score (weighted average).
1. Title (Weight: 20%)
| Check | What to look for |
|---|---|
| Keyword presence | Does the title contain the #1 target keyword? |
| Character usage | Using close to 30 characters? (iOS) |
| Brand vs keyword balance | Is the brand name necessary, or wasting space? |
| Readability | Natural reading, not keyword-stuffed? |
| Uniqueness | Distinct from competitors? |
Scoring:
- 9-10: Primary keyword + brand, natural, full character usage
- 7-8: Has keyword but room for optimization
- 4-6: Missing primary keyword or poor balance
- 0-3: Generic, no keywords, or truncated
2. Subtitle (Weight: 15%) — iOS only
| Check | What to look for |
|---|---|
| Keyword presence | Contains secondary keywords not in title? |
| No repetition | Doesn't repeat title keywords? |
| Value proposition | Communicates a benefit? |
| Character usage | Using close to 30 characters? |
3. Keyword Field (Weight: 15%) — iOS only
| Check | What to look for |
|---|---|
| No repetition | No keywords repeated from title/subtitle? |
| No spaces | Commas without spaces? |
| Singular forms | Using singular (Apple indexes both forms)? |
| Character usage | Using all 100 characters? |
| Relevance | All keywords relevant to the app? |
| No wasted words | No brand names, category names, or "app"? |
4. Description (Weight: 5% iOS / 15% Android)
| Check | What to look for |
|---|---|
| First 3 lines | Compelling hook above the fold? |
| Feature highlights | Clear benefits, not just features? |
| Keyword density (Android) | Natural keyword usage throughout? |
| Formatting | Uses line breaks, bullets, or emoji for readability? |
| Call to action | Ends with a clear CTA? |
| Social proof | Mentions awards, press, or user count? |
5. Screenshots (Weight: 15%)
| Check | What to look for |
|---|---|
| Count | All 10 slots used? |
| First 3 | Most compelling features shown first? |
| Text overlays | Clear, readable benefit-driven captions? |
| Consistency | Cohesive design language? |
| Localization | Localized for target market? |
| Device frames | Modern device frames (or frameless)? |
6. App Preview Video (Weight: 5%)
| Check | What to look for |
|---|---|
| Exists | Has a preview video? |
| First 3 seconds | Hook in the first 3 seconds? |
| Length | 15-30 seconds optimal? |
| Sound | Works without sound (captions)? |
7. Ratings & Reviews (Weight: 15%)
| Check | What to look for |
|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.5+ stars? |
| Rating count | Sufficient for category? |
| Recent reviews | Positive trend in last 30 days? |
| Review responses | Developer responds to negative reviews? |
| Rating prompts | Strategic in-app rating prompts? |
8. Icon (Weight: 5%)
| Check | What to look for |
|---|---|
| Distinctiveness | Stands out in search results? |
| Simplicity | Clear at small sizes? |
| Category fit | Matches category expectations? |
| No text | Avoids text (unreadable at small sizes)? |
9. Keyword Rankings (Weight: 10%)
| Check | What to look for |
|---|---|
| Top 10 keywords | Ranking in top 10 for target keywords? |
| Keyword coverage | Ranking for enough relevant keywords? |
| Trend | Rankings improving or declining? |
| Competitor gap | Missing keywords competitors rank for? |
10. Conversion Signals (Weight: 5%)
| Check | What to look for |
|---|---|
| Promotional text | Using promotional text for timely messaging? |
| What's New | Recent, informative update notes? |
| In-App Events | Using in-app events for visibility? |
| Custom Product Pages | Multiple product pages for different audiences? |
Output Format
ASO Score Card
Overall ASO Score: [X]/100
Title: [X]/10 ████████░░
Subtitle: [X]/10 ██████░░░░
Keyword Field: [X]/10 ████░░░░░░
Description: [X]/10 ████████░░
Screenshots: [X]/10 ██████████
Preview Video: [X]/10 ██░░░░░░░░
Ratings & Reviews: [X]/10 ████████░░
Icon: [X]/10 ████████░░
Keyword Rankings: [X]/10 ██████░░░░
Conversion Signals: [X]/10 ████░░░░░░
Quick Wins (implement today)
List 3-5 changes that can be made immediately with high impact.
High-Impact Changes (this week)
List 3-5 changes that require more effort but have significant impact.
Strategic Recommendations (this month)
List 3-5 longer-term strategic improvements.
Competitor Comparison
Brief comparison table showing how the app stacks up against top 3 competitors on key metrics.
Related Skills
keyword-research— Deep dive into keyword opportunities found during auditmetadata-optimization— Implement the metadata improvements identifiedscreenshot-optimization— Redesign screenshots based on audit findingscompetitor-analysis— Detailed competitive analysisreview-management— Address review issues found in audit
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most audit compliance skills give in ~1.5k tokens
Counted across 937 of the 1,487 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07
- Fetch latest guidelines before each reviewin 43 of 937, across 3 files
- Group findings by severityin 43 of 937
- Check files against all fetched rulesin 42 of 937, across 2 files
- Output findings in terse file:line formatin 41 of 937, across 3 files
- Ask user which files to review if none specifiedin 41 of 937, across 3 files
- Read specified files or prompt user for filesin 39 of 937, across 1 file
- Generate the audit reportin 33 of 937, across 30 files
- Assign a severity to every findingin 25 of 937
- Run automated accessibility scansin 23 of 937, across 13 files
- Output a markdown audit reportin 22 of 937
- Map findings to WCAG criteriain 20 of 937, across 10 files
- Confirm audit scopein 19 of 937, across 9 files
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.