Agency pitch mockups
Shared skills, prompts, and tooling for Picsart's gen-ai CLI and generative-AI workflows
npx -y skills add PicsArt/gen-ai-skills --skill agency-pitch-mockupsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Client-branded pitch mockups: hero, tiles, slides.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
8.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Agency pitch mockups
Rapid visuals for a new-business pitch deck: campaign hero, product tiles, key-visual explorations, quote slides — all client-branded, all clearly-labeled-as-mockup, all iterable in under an hour before the pitch.
Brief + locked direction → full pitch-deck asset set. Speed first (pitch windows are brutal), reusability second (if you win, these become production inputs), clarity third (nobody should confuse a mockup for shipped work).
When to Use
- Net-new business pitch, 48-hour turnaround
- Mid-pitch concept swap — client leaned toward direction 3, need assets tonight
- Multiple concepts per pitch (A/B/C) — each needs its own hero + 3 tiles
- Internal review deck for a signed client's next campaign
- Pre-approval creative exploration before any photo/video production spend
Do not use for finished deliverables — pitch mockups are intentionally aspirational and mockup-flagged. For final assets after win, use agency-multi-brand-pack or project-specific production workflows.
Prerequisites
Ask the user (one message):
- Client slug + brand file — path to
clients/<slug>/brand.md(output ofagency-brand-scoping). If missing, run brand-scoping first. - Pitch concept(s) — one tagline or idea per concept (e.g. "Banking that waits for you")
- Deliverable breakdown — how many heroes, tiles, quote slides per concept? Default: 1 hero + 3 tiles + 2 quote slides
- Pitch date — drives whether we run cheap drafts or go straight to finals
- Confidentiality — NDA status; affects Drive folder + any watermark choice
- Mockup labeling — visible "MOCKUP" watermark, subtle footer, or none? (default: subtle footer for external pitches)
If the user hasn't locked a direction yet, stop and route them to agency-brand-scoping first. Don't pitch on guesses.
How to Run
1. LOAD BRAND → read clients/<slug>/brand.md + brand-system.json
2. PLAN → table of every asset with prompt + aspect + model
3. ESTIMATE → gen-ai pricing on the full manifest (target < $5)
4. DRAFT PASS → run at draft quality (gemini-3.1-flash-image / recraftv4) for fast iteration
5. CLIENT REVIEW → internal pitch-team review on the draft set
6. FINALIZE → upgrade approved concepts to flagship models
7. WATERMARK → add subtle "MOCKUP" footer where required
8. DELIVER → organized folder + approved upload/link + deck-ready filenames
Rules:
- Always draft-then-upgrade. 80% of pitch iterations die in internal review — don't pay flagship prices twice.
- Every prompt cites the brand file. ` on every generate / batch.
- Pitch mockups should be obviously mockups unless the client expects production-level polish. Padded aspect ratios, generic text ("HEADLINE HERE"), or visible mockup tags reduce the "why isn't this the final?" conversation.
- Never use real competitor brand marks, real logos you don't have rights to, or recognizable faces. Stock-lookalike issues kill pitch trust.
Quick Reference
{
"client_slug": "acme-fintech",
"concept": "waits-for-you",
"phase": "draft",
"brand_system": "clients/acme-fintech/brand-system.json",
"defaults": {
"model": "recraftv4"
},
"variants": {
"asset": ["hero", "tile-01", "tile-02", "tile-03", "quote-01", "quote-02"]
},
"mockup_footer": "MOCKUP — For internal review only"
}
Quick Reference
| Sub-task | Draft | Final | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hero / key visual | recraftv4 | flux-2-pro | Flux lifts it to photoreal polish when a concept sticks |
| Product / audience tiles | recraftv4 | recraftv4_pro if available, else hold at recraftv4 | Usually fine at draft quality |
| Quote slides (readable headlines) | ideogram-v3 | ideogram-v3 | Only model that renders type reliably |
| Animated key visual for video pitch | kling-v3-standard | kling-v3-pro | See gen-ai-use skill for assembly |
| Throwaway concept tests (10+ options) | gemini-3.1-flash-image / gemini-3.1-flash-image | n/a | ~1 credit each |
Procedure
- Draft at 1/5 the cost of finals. Approve concepts on cheap drafts, upgrade 2-3 winners only.
- One concept per folder.
pitches/concept-a/,pitches/concept-b/— never mix. - Watermark external pitches. Subtle
MOCKUPfooter on every image; use a deck/editor overlay, ImageMagick, or ffmpeg if available. - Reuse hero as tile input.
gen-ai generate -m recraftv4 -i pitch/hero.webp --prompt "square crop variant"keeps concept coherent. - Never show the client 6 options with 3 winners. Curate to 2-3 strong concepts max before the pitch.
- Keep filenames deck-ready.
hero.webp,tile-01.webp— notgen_01H2XYZ.webp. - Lock the prompt file per concept.
pitches/<concept>/prompts.json— when you win, production starts here.
Pitfalls
- Over-polished mockups that the client expects you to deliver for pitch prices — add mockup footer + use draft models
- **Skipping ` — palette drift mid-manifest, deck looks incoherent
- Cross-client prompt contamination — don't copy prompts from another client's repo without stripping brand specifics
- Using real faces / real brand marks — rights issues; use descriptors ("a founder in their 30s") and generic marks
- Missing rights documentation — if the pitch wins, you'll need to reproduce these with clean provenance; save
results.jsonper run - No
gen-ai pricingbefore a 50-variant concept explosion — pitch budgets don't absorb $40 surprises
Verification
Run gen-ai whoami to confirm authentication, then re-run the failed command with --debug.
Step 1: Plan the asset set
Present a table before spending:
| # | Asset | Concept | Model (draft → final) | Aspect | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hero | "Banking that waits" | recraftv4 → flux-2-pro | 16:9 | Full-bleed, tagline overlay |
| 2 | Tile A | Product focus | recraftv4 | 1:1 | Clean product shot |
| 3 | Tile B | Audience focus | recraftv4 | 1:1 | Founder at desk, moody |
| 4 | Tile C | Benefit focus | recraftv4 | 1:1 | Abstract benefit icon |
| 5 | Quote slide 1 | Customer voice | ideogram-v3 | 16:9 | Readable headline type |
| 6 | Quote slide 2 | Founder voice | ideogram-v3 | 16:9 | Readable headline type |
Estimate the manifest. If under $5, proceed. If over, cut the draft resolution or concept count.
Step 2: Draft manifest + run
CLIENT="acme-fintech"
CONCEPT="waits-for-you"
OUT="clients/$CLIENT/pitches/$CONCEPT/drafts"
mkdir -p "$OUT"
cat > /tmp/pitch-$CLIENT-$CONCEPT.json <<EOF
{
"defaults": {
"model": "recraftv4"
},
"jobs": [
{ "id": "hero", "prompt": "$CLIENT hero, concept: banking that waits for you — editorial, cinematic, headline overlay area left-third", "aspectRatio": "16:9" },
{ "id": "tile-01", "prompt": "$CLIENT product tile — clean product render, brand palette", "aspectRatio": "1:1" },
{ "id": "tile-02", "prompt": "$CLIENT audience tile — founder at desk, moody lighting, documentary", "aspectRatio": "1:1" },
{ "id": "tile-03", "prompt": "$CLIENT benefit tile — abstract waiting metaphor, minimal composition", "aspectRatio": "1:1" },
{ "id": "quote-01", "prompt": "quote slide, large editorial headline 'Finally a bank that moves like I do.', brand palette, minimal background", "aspectRatio": "16:9", "model": "ideogram-v3" },
{ "id": "quote-02", "prompt": "quote slide, large editorial headline 'Built for founders who don't wait.', brand palette, minimal background", "aspectRatio": "16:9", "model": "ideogram-v3" }
]
}
EOF
gen-ai batch run /tmp/pitch-$CLIENT-$CONCEPT.json -c 4 -o "$OUT"
Review internally. For approved concepts, re-run the subset with model: flux-2-pro and output to pitches/$CONCEPT/finals/.
Cost & time
| Phase | Spend | Time |
|---|---|---|
Draft pass (6 assets, recraftv4) | ~$1-2 | 10-15 min |
Final upgrade (2-3 winners to flux-2-pro) | ~$2-4 | 15-20 min |
| Total pitch kit | ~$5 | ~45 min end-to-end |
Compare to production-phase cost after win: single campaign set with final photography-grade generations runs $20-100+.
See also
workflows/agency-brand-scoping/— lock direction + brand.md before pitchingworkflows/agency-multi-brand-pack/— retainer production across clientsworkflows/agency-client-handoff/— package final deliverables post-wingen-ai-use— if the pitch needs a sizzle reelgen-ai-workflows.md§9 (Pitch mockups) — source recipegen-ai-batch.md— manifest + concurrency tuning