agentsclimarketplace

Triage inbox

Skill pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/.claude/skills/triage-inbox

A ready-to-fork Claude Code template for academics using LaTeX/Beamer + R. Multi-agent review, quality gates, adversarial QA, and replication protocols.

Install
npx -y skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill triage-inbox

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Triage academic email and calendar (Gmail / Google Calendar via the session's MCP) into a prioritized digest plus a referee-obligations tracker — classifying referee requests, R&R and editor correspondence, co-author threads, seminar and conference invites, and grant/admin deadlines, and proposing a human-gated action for each (draft reply, calendar hold, scaffold a project, snooze). Use when user says "triage my inbox", "check my academic email", "what needs my attention this week", "go through my mail", or when run as a scheduled routine. NEVER auto-sends or auto-accepts anything.

SKILL.md

9.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

/triage-inbox — Academic Inbox + Calendar Triage

Turn a noisy academic inbox into a short, decision-ready digest. Fetch recent mail and calendar context through the session's MCP servers (Gmail / Google Calendar), classify each thread into the categories an academic actually acts on, and propose one action per thread — always human-gated. The companion artifact is a running referee-obligations tracker so you never silently overcommit to reviews.

Core principle: this skill reads, classifies, and proposes. It drafts; it never sends, accepts, declines, or books anything without you. That boundary is what makes it safe to run unattended as a /schedule routine.

When to use

  • Weekly / daily sweep — "what landed that needs a decision?" without reading every thread yourself.
  • As a scheduled routine — wired to /schedule to run each morning and leave a digest waiting.
  • Referee-load management — keep an honest count of outstanding reviews against a standing cap before you say yes to one more.
  • R&R / editor deadline capture — turn "minor revision due in 6 weeks" buried in an email into a calendar hold proposal.

When NOT to use

  • To actually send a reply, accept an invite, or book an event — this skill stops at proposals. You confirm and execute.
  • To handoff a project to a co-author — that's /coauthor-brief.
  • To draft the R&R response document itself — that's /respond-to-referees.

Phases

Phase 0 — Pre-flight (MCP check, window, referee cap)

  1. Confirm MCP access. This skill reaches mail/calendar only through the session's MCP tools (Gmail search/read, Google Calendar list/suggest). They are session-scoped — in a headless claude -p or cron run they may be absent. Probe once (e.g. list labels / list calendars). If unavailable, degrade gracefully: emit a tracker-only digest from the on-disk tracker (Phase 3) plus a one-line "MCP servers not reachable in this run — skipped fetch" note, and exit cleanly. Never fail the routine over a missing server.
  2. Resolve the lookback window--since (an ISO date or Ndays), else the timestamp of the last digest in quality_reports/inbox/, else default 7 days. Echo it back.
  3. Set the referee-load cap--cap if given, else read the standing cap from the tracker header, else default 3 concurrent reviews. This cap gates the recommendation in Phase 2, not your inbox.
  4. Echo a one-line pre-flight before fetching: window, cap, calendar on/off (--no-calendar), dry-run on/off.

Phase 1 — Fetch + classify

  1. Fetch recent threads via the MCP Gmail search tool over the window; if calendar is on, pull existing events/free-busy for the deadline-conflict check.

  2. Classify each thread into exactly one bucket:

    BucketSignals
    Referee request"invite you to review", journal/editor sender, manuscript ID, "would you be willing"
    R&R / editor correspondence"revise and resubmit", "minor/major revision", decision letter, due-date language
    Co-author threadknown collaborator, shared-paper subject, "can you", "your section", attachment churn
    Seminar / conference invite"invited talk", "submit by", CFP, "seminar series", scheduling polls
    Grant / admin deadlinefunder name, "submission deadline", reporting/compliance, IRB/DUA renewals
    Noisenewsletters, receipts, auto-notifications — counted, not itemized
  3. Capture per thread: sender, subject, a one-line gist, any explicit deadline, and the bucket.

Phase 2 — Propose one action per thread (NEVER auto-send)

For each non-noise thread, propose exactly one of:

  • Draft reply — write a courteous draft for review. Do not send. If the Gmail MCP exposes a create-draft tool, you MAY stage a Gmail draft (which still requires the user to hit send) — otherwise inline the text in the digest.
  • Calendar hold — for an R&R / grant / talk deadline, propose a hold (title, date, lead-time reminder). Surface conflicts against existing events. Propose only — booking is the user's click.
  • Scaffold a referee project — for an accepted (or leaning-yes) referee request under the cap, offer to run /new-referee-project on the attached manuscript. Over the cap → recommend a polite decline draft instead, and say why ("4 reviews already open vs. cap of 3").
  • Summarize + offer a brief — for a co-author thread, distill the asks and offer to generate a /coauthor-brief.
  • Snooze — defer with a re-surface date; nothing else happens.

Hard gate: every outbound action (send, accept, decline, book, scaffold) waits for explicit user confirmation. Drafts and holds are proposals. Honor --dry-run by proposing without staging even drafts.

Phase 3 — Emit digest + update the obligations tracker

  1. Digestquality_reports/inbox/YYYY-MM-DD_triage.md (create the dir). Buckets ordered by urgency; each item is a one-liner + its proposed action. Noise is a count, not a list.
  2. Referee-obligations trackerquality_reports/inbox/referee-obligations.md (a persistent ledger, not dated). Append/refresh rows for any review accepted, declined, or completed this run; recompute open count vs. cap; flag overdue rows.

Output / report format

# Inbox Triage — YYYY-MM-DD   (window: last N days · referee cap: K)

## Needs a decision (M)
- **[R&R]** *J. of X* — minor revision, **due 2026-07-15**. → Propose calendar hold (−14d reminder); conflicts: none.
- **[Referee]** *Econometrica* — review request, manuscript 12-345. Open reviews 2/3 → under cap. → Offer `/new-referee-project`.
- **[Co-author]** A. Smith — "can you redo Table 3 with not-yet-treated controls?" → Summarized; offer `/coauthor-brief`.

## FYI / snoozed (P)
- **[Seminar]** Dept. brown-bag poll — snoozed to 2026-06-16.

## Noise: 24 threads (newsletters, receipts) — not itemized.

## Referee load: 2 open / cap 3  (see referee-obligations.md)

Plus the one-line chat summary: digest path, counts per bucket, open-reviews-vs-cap, and whether the MCP fetch ran or was skipped.

Exit behavior

  • Normal run: write the digest, refresh the tracker, print the summary line. No mail sent, no event booked, no project scaffolded — those await your confirmation.
  • MCP unavailable (headless/cron): tracker-only digest + "fetch skipped" note; exit 0. The routine must not error just because a session server is absent.
  • Over the referee cap: still surface the request, but the proposed action is a decline draft with the count as rationale — never a silent scaffold.
  • --dry-run: propose everything, stage nothing (not even a draft).

Flags

  • --since <Ndays|date> — Lookback window. Default: the last digest's timestamp, else 7 days.
  • --cap <N> — Standing concurrent-review cap that gates referee scaffolding. Default: the tracker header value, else 3.
  • --no-calendar — Skip the Calendar MCP entirely; classify mail only, no holds proposed.
  • --dry-run — Propose actions without staging anything (no Gmail drafts created).

Cross-references

What this skill does NOT do

  • Send, reply, accept, decline, or book. It drafts and proposes; you execute. No exceptions, including in scheduled runs.
  • Auto-scaffold a referee project. It offers /new-referee-project; scaffolding waits for your yes and respects the cap.
  • Run unattended with side effects. Outbound actions are always human-gated — the only thing a cron run writes is the digest and the tracker.
  • Read or store message bodies wholesale. It extracts gists, deadlines, and senders; it does not archive email contents or attachment data into the repo.
  • Reach mail/calendar without MCP. No direct IMAP/API credentials — everything goes through the session's MCP servers, and their absence degrades gracefully.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.