Pedagogy review
Skill pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/.claude/skills/pedagogy-review
A ready-to-fork Claude Code template for academics using LaTeX/Beamer + R. Multi-agent review, quality gates, adversarial QA, and replication protocols.
npx -y skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill pedagogy-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Holistic pedagogical review of a lecture deck (`.qmd` or `.tex`). Checks narrative arc, prerequisite assumptions, worked examples, notation clarity, and deck-level pacing. Use when user says "pedagogy review", "does this teach well?", "is the flow right?", "will students follow?", "review the narrative", or before teaching a deck for the first time. Read-only; produces a report.
SKILL.md
1.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Pedagogical Review of Lecture Slides
Perform a comprehensive pedagogical review.
Steps
-
Identify the file specified in
$ARGUMENTS- If no argument, ask user which lecture to review
- If just a name, look in
Quarto/orSlides/
-
Launch the pedagogy-reviewer agent with the full file path
- The agent checks 13 pedagogical patterns
- Performs deck-level analysis (narrative arc, pacing, visual rhythm, notation)
- Considers student perspective (prerequisites, objections)
-
The agent produces a report saved to:
quality_reports/[FILENAME_WITHOUT_EXT]_pedagogy_report.md -
Present summary to user:
- Patterns followed vs violated (out of 13)
- Deck-level assessments
- Critical recommendations (top 3-5)
Important Notes
- This is a read-only review — no files are edited
- Focuses on pedagogy not visual layout (use
/visual-auditfor that) - For a combined review, use
/slide-excellenceinstead