Cultural intelligence
Skill paulieb89/bouch-plugins/plugins/foundations/skills/cultural-intelligence
Claude Code plugins for UK professionals — property investors, solicitors, and business owners. Real Land Registry, Rightmove, legislation.gov.uk, and Companies House data.
npx -y skills add paulieb89/bouch-plugins --skill cultural-intelligenceAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Produces a cultural intelligence dossier on a creator, brand, artist, or cultural figure — drawn from public web signal (Reddit, YouTube, news press, Wikipedia, and similar). Returns a structured brief covering identity, trajectory, community clusters, recent key moments, cultural position, editorial angle, and honest blind spots. Use when the user says "write a dossier on X", "what's the cultural read on X", "give me a briefing on [creator/brand/artist]", "is X culturally relevant right now", "what's happening around X", "prep me to pitch a brand about X", or similar cultural-research requests. Optional: the user can say "for [client]" to tailor the editorial angle (e.g. "for a culture desk", "for a youth-culture agency"). UK and US subjects both work; other markets work but note the blind spots.
The file declares its own license as Apache-2.0. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
5.8 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Cultural Intelligence
Produce a structured cultural intelligence dossier on a creator, brand, artist, or cultural figure. You work from public web signal — there is no private database, no scraper, no paid tool. Your value is in routing around each source's blind spots and synthesising a read that an editor or brand-pitch team could actually act on.
This skill exists because generic "look up X" searches return biography and follower counts. Neither helps. A culture-desk editor or commercial lead needs to know what is happening around this person right now, where the conversation lives, and what a brand or story could land on. That is a different job. This skill does that job.
Example invocations
- "Write a cultural intelligence dossier on KSI"
- "What's the cultural read on Corteiz right now, for a culture desk"
- "Give me a briefing on Central Cee — is he still live or on a plateau?"
- "Is Munya Chawawa culturally relevant right now?"
- "Prep a dossier on slowthai — we're considering a festival booking"
- "What's happening around [creator] — I need to pitch them to a brand"
- "For an agency chasing UK youth fashion, is [brand] a real opportunity?"
If the user has not named a target, ask. If the user has not said who the dossier is for, ask — the client angle section depends on it. Skip the client-angle tailoring only if they explicitly say "just the data, no pitch".
Step 1 — Clarify the brief
Before searching, confirm who the subject is (full name, handle, or stage name — name collisions are real), who the dossier is for (a culture desk, brand agency, festival booker, internal research), and whether there is a specific question behind the brief ("are they relevant?" leads a different search than "what's happening in the last 30 days?"). If any of these are missing, ask before searching. One AskUserQuestion round is cheaper than a misaimed dossier.
Step 2 — Search by archetype
Route to the right platforms before you start fetching. Different creator types live on different sources — see references/platform-routing.md for the 8-archetype routing table and guidance on what counts as strong vs weak signal. Start with a broad web search for the subject's name plus the current year to pull recent press, then pivot based on what archetype emerges.
Step 3 — Triangulate sources
Make 10-20 targeted fetches for recent press (last 90 days), dedicated community hubs, adjacent communities, owned channels, third-party analytics, controversy and context events, and collaborations. Be ruthless about what counts as signal: PR boilerplate and reposted content from the subject's own team are weak. Independent press, active community discussion, and documentation of actual events are strong. Do not hallucinate citations — every fact must come from a source you actually fetched.
Step 4 — Slice what matters
From the raw signal, extract monthly mention volume over the last 12 months (for trajectory), community distribution across sources, 2-5 key moments from the last 90 days, current narrative clusters, and blind spots where the signal stops.
Step 5 — Write the dossier
Fill all 9 sections of the schema in assets/dossier-schema.md, in order. Every field is required. If a field cannot be answered from the data, say "insufficient signal" explicitly — do not fabricate. Flag data confidence at the top, not the bottom.
Output rules
- Cite every factual claim inline. No uncited assertions.
- Use British spelling throughout.
- Number-anchor trajectory calls. Never "rising" without months and counts.
- Flag data confidence at the top of the dossier.
- End with blind spots. They are not an appendix — they are part of the product.
- Maximum length: approximately 1200 words total. Dossiers that balloon past that usually have filler to cut.
When NOT to use this skill
- Biographical or historical research. "Tell me about X's career" is a Wikipedia request, not a cultural intelligence dossier.
- Real-time news monitoring. This is a one-shot snapshot, not a live alert system.
- Fact-checking a single claim. If the user only needs "did X happen?", do a WebSearch and answer. Don't run the full dossier machinery.
- Subjects you cannot find. If after initial searches you find almost no signal, tell the user and stop. "Insufficient signal — this person's footprint is too thin for a useful dossier from public web sources" is a valid output.
- Subjects with closed-platform-only audiences. If someone is huge on TikTok and Instagram but invisible on the open web, set expectations upfront rather than producing a misleading read.
Files in this skill
references/platform-routing.md— 8-archetype search routing table, triangulation guidance, and what makes a good dossierassets/dossier-schema.md— full 9-section dossier schema with guidance text for each field