Generator
Skill pantheon-org/tekhne/skills/observability/promql/generator
Agents Skills
npx -y skills add pantheon-org/tekhne --skill generatorAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 9 stars9 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Generate PromQL queries for calculating error rates, aggregating metrics across labels, creating histogram percentiles, writing recording rules, and building SLO burn-rate alerts following Prometheus best practices. Use when creating new PromQL queries, implementing monitoring and alerting rules, building observability dashboards, working with Prometheus metrics (counters, gauges, histograms, summaries), or applying RED (Rate, Errors, Duration) and USE (Utilization, Saturation, Errors) monitoring patterns.
SKILL.md
11.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
PromQL Query Generator
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when you need to:
- Write a PromQL query for error rates, latency percentiles, or availability.
- Author recording rules or SLO burn-rate alerting rules.
- Aggregate metrics across labels using RED or USE monitoring patterns.
- Build queries for Prometheus counters, gauges, histograms, or summaries.
When NOT to use this skill:
- Validating or optimising an existing query — use
promql-validatorinstead. - Non-Prometheus query languages (LogQL, MetricsQL dialect specifics, SQL) — use the matching tool.
- Configuring Prometheus scrape targets or storage — that is server config, not query authoring.
Mindset
- Match the function to the metric type. rate() is for counters, histogram_quantile() for histograms; applying rate() to a gauge is meaningless.
- Error rate is a ratio. Express it as rated errors over rated totals across the same window, not as raw counts.
- Control cardinality on purpose. Choose by()/without() labels deliberately so a query cannot explode a dashboard.
- Alert on sustained burn. SLO alerts use multi-window burn rates and a for clause, not a single instantaneous threshold.
Interactive Query Planning Workflow
CRITICAL: Always engage the user in collaborative planning before generating any query. Never skip the planning phase.
Workflow (7 stages)
- Understand the goal — Ask what the user wants to monitor (request rate, error rate, latency, resource usage, availability, SLO tracking) and the use case (dashboard, alert, recording rule, ad-hoc).
- Identify metrics — Confirm metric names, types (counter/gauge/histogram/summary), and relevant labels. Suggest common naming patterns if uncertain.
- Determine parameters — Confirm time range, label filters, aggregation, and thresholds. If the user already specified values (e.g., "5-minute window", "> 5% error rate"), acknowledge them as pre-filled defaults and allow quick confirmation rather than re-asking.
- Present the query plan — Before writing any code, present a plain-English plan (goal, query structure, expected output, example interpretation) and ask for confirmation via AskUserQuestion with options: "Yes, generate this query" / "Modify [aspect]" / "Show alternatives".
- Generate the query — Once confirmed, read the relevant reference file(s) before writing code, cite the applicable pattern, and apply the best practices below.
- Validate — Automatically invoke
devops-skills:promql-validator. Display structured results (syntax, best practices, explanation). Fix any issues and re-validate until all checks pass. - Deliver — Provide the final query, plain-English explanation, usage instructions (dashboard / alert / recording rule), customization notes, and related query suggestions.
Ask vs. Infer: If the user's request already clearly specifies goal, use case, and context, acknowledge those details instead of re-asking. Only ask for missing or ambiguous information.
Best Practices for Query Generation
Always consult the relevant reference file before writing code.
| Scenario | Reference File |
|---|---|
| Histogram queries | references/metric_types.md (Histogram section) |
| Error/latency patterns | references/promql_patterns.md (RED section) |
| Resource monitoring | references/promql_patterns.md (USE section) |
| Optimization / anti-patterns | references/best_practices.md |
| Specific functions | references/promql_functions.md |
Key Rules
- Always add label filters — reduces cardinality and improves performance.
- Match functions to metric types —
rate()/increase()on counters;*_over_time()or direct use for gauges;histogram_quantile()for histograms. - Prefer
by()/without()on all aggregations. - Prefer exact label matches over regex when the value is known.
- Use recording rules for queries that are expensive or reused frequently (naming:
level:metric:operations). - Format multi-line for complex queries.
Core Patterns
# Request rate (counter)
sum(rate(http_requests_total{job="api-server"}[5m])) by (endpoint)
# Error rate ratio
sum(rate(http_requests_total{job="api-server", status_code=~"5.."}[5m]))
/ sum(rate(http_requests_total{job="api-server"}[5m]))
# P95 latency (classic histogram)
histogram_quantile(0.95,
sum by (le) (rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{job="api-server"}[5m]))
)
# P95 latency (native histogram, Prometheus 3.x+)
histogram_quantile(0.95,
sum by (job) (rate(http_request_duration_seconds[5m]))
)
# Availability
(count(up{job="api-server"} == 1) / count(up{job="api-server"})) * 100
# Burn rate (99.9% SLO, 1h window)
(
sum(rate(http_requests_total{job="api", status_code=~"5.."}[1h]))
/ sum(rate(http_requests_total{job="api"}[1h]))
) / 0.001
# Multi-window burn-rate alert (page: 2% budget in 1h, burn rate 14.4)
(
sum(rate(http_requests_total{job="api", status_code=~"5.."}[1h]))
/ sum(rate(http_requests_total{job="api"}[1h]))
) > 14.4 * 0.001
and
(
sum(rate(http_requests_total{job="api", status_code=~"5.."}[5m]))
/ sum(rate(http_requests_total{job="api"}[5m]))
) > 14.4 * 0.001
For complete SLO patterns, Native Histogram functions (histogram_count, histogram_sum, histogram_fraction), subqueries, offset/@ modifiers, vector matching, and Kubernetes patterns — see the assets/ files.
Validation Checklist
After generating, invoke devops-skills:promql-validator and display results in this format:
## PromQL Validation Results
### Syntax Check
- Status: ✅ VALID / ⚠️ WARNING / ❌ ERROR
- Issues: [list any syntax errors]
### Best Practices Check
- Status: ✅ OPTIMIZED / ⚠️ CAN BE IMPROVED / ❌ HAS ISSUES
- Issues: [list problems found]
- Suggestions: [list optimizations]
### Query Explanation
- What it measures: [plain English]
- Output labels: [label list or "None (scalar)"]
- Expected result structure: [instant vector / scalar / etc.]
Fix all issues and re-validate until clean.
Alerting and Recording Rule Snippets
# Alerting rule with for clause
alert: HighErrorRate
expr: |
(
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status_code=~"5.."}[5m]))
/ sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))
) > 0.05
for: 10m
# Recording rule (naming: level:metric:operations)
- record: job:http_requests:rate5m
expr: sum by (job) (rate(http_requests_total[5m]))
Anti-Patterns
NEVER use rate() on a gauge metric
- WHY:
rate()computes per-second rate of increase and assumes monotonically increasing counters. Applied to a gauge, it produces nonsensical results because gauges can decrease. - BAD:
rate(node_memory_MemFree_bytes[5m])— memory is a gauge - GOOD:
node_memory_MemFree_bytes(direct use) ordelta(node_memory_MemFree_bytes[5m])for change over time
NEVER query a histogram with avg() across quantile labels
- WHY: Summary metrics expose pre-aggregated
{quantile="0.95"}labels that cannot be re-aggregated across instances. Usingavg()on them produces statistically meaningless results. - BAD:
avg(http_request_duration_seconds{quantile="0.95"}) - GOOD:
histogram_quantile(0.95, sum by (le) (rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])))— use histogram type withhistogram_quantile()
NEVER use a high-cardinality label in by() without filtering first
- WHY: Aggregating by
user_id,request_id, orpodwithout label filters produces thousands of series, overwhelming dashboards and recording rules. - BAD:
sum by (user_id) (rate(http_requests_total[5m])) - GOOD:
sum by (job, status_code) (rate(http_requests_total{job="api"}[5m]))— filter and aggregate on stable, low-cardinality labels
NEVER use increase() for alerting thresholds
- WHY:
increase()is extrapolated and can return non-integer values on sparse counters. For alerting,rate()produces stable per-second thresholds that are scrape-interval independent. - BAD:
increase(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m]) > 10 - GOOD:
rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m]) > 0.033(2 errors/minute = 0.033/second)
NEVER omit the for clause on alert rules
- WHY: Alerts without
forfire immediately on a single evaluation, causing false positives from transient spikes. Theforclause requires the condition to be true for a sustained period. - BAD:
alert: HighErrorRatewithexpr: error_rate > 0.05and nofor - GOOD: Add
for: 5mto require the condition to hold for 5 minutes before firing
Documentation Lookup
- context7 MCP (preferred): resolve
prometheus, then fetch docs with the relevant topic. - Fallback WebSearch:
"Prometheus PromQL [function/operator] documentation [version] examples"
Error Handling Quick Reference
| Symptom | Likely Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Empty results | Wrong label filters or metric not scraped | Check up{job="..."}, verify label values |
| Too many series | High cardinality | Add label filters, aggregate, use recording rules |
| Wrong values | Wrong function for metric type | rate() on counters; direct or *_over_time() on gauges |
| Slow queries | Large range vectors or missing filters | Narrow time range, add filters, use recording rules |
References
Internal:
- PromQL Functions — all PromQL functions with examples; read for specific function syntax questions
- PromQL Patterns — RED/USE method patterns, alerting rules, recording rules; read for standard monitoring patterns
- Best Practices — anti-patterns, performance optimization, cardinality management; read when optimizing queries
- Metric Types — counter/gauge/histogram/summary guide; read to confirm correct function choice
- Common Queries — reusable request rate, error rate, latency, and availability query templates
- RED Method — complete RED method (Rate, Errors, Duration) implementation
- USE Method — complete USE method (Utilization, Saturation, Errors) implementation
- SLO Patterns — SLO, error budget, burn rate, and multi-window alerting patterns
- Alerting Rules — example alerting rules with thresholds and
forclauses - Recording Rules — example recording rules with
level:metric:operationsnaming - Kubernetes Patterns — kube-state-metrics, cAdvisor, and vector matching examples
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most monitoring observability skills give
Counted across 481 of the 483 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-06
- link every alert to a runbookin 43 of 481, across 35 files
- use structured json loggingin 36 of 481, across 31 files
- alert on user-facing symptomsin 20 of 481, across 15 files
- emit structured JSON logs with stable event namesin 18 of 481, across 13 files
- propagate trace context across boundariesin 16 of 481
- use histograms for latency trackingin 14 of 481, across 9 files
- use OpenTelemetry for distributed tracingin 13 of 481, across 8 files
- include a correlation ID on every log linein 13 of 481, across 8 files
- Define service level objectivesin 10 of 481, across 7 files
- Call useAzureMonitor before importing other modulesin 9 of 481, across 2 files
- stop and ask for clarification if inputs are missingin 9 of 481, across 2 files
- define on-call questions before adding telemetryin 9 of 481, across 4 files
Said here and by no other author read
- ask for missing information before generating queries
- present a plain-English query plan before writing code
- add label filters to all queries
- use by or without for aggregations
- include a for clause in alert rules
- run the validator after generating queries
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once.